On Utilitarianism Essay

1505 words - 6 pages

In Utilitarianism, J.S. Mill gives an account for the reasons one must abide by the principles of Utilitarianism. Also referred to as the Greatest-happiness Principle, this doctrine promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. More specifically, Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism, holding that the right act is that which yields the greatest net utility, or "the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain", for all individuals affected by said act (Joyce, lecture notes from 03/30).

In defining utilitarianism, J.S. Mill counters the popular belief that this theory only deals with the pleasure yielded by actions of individuals by stating that, "the theory of utility... [is] not something to be contradistinguished from pleasure, but pleasure... together with exemption from pain" (596). He goes on to argue that the foundation of this principle lies in the fact that an individual's action is right if it tends to promote happiness and wrong if it tends to "produce the reverse of happiness" (597). For example, an enemy forcibly entered your village with the intent on killing every woman and child in town if no one turned over the sniper that took some of their men out. If you tell them who the sniper is, no harm will be done to the women and children, but since the sniper is long gone, you decide to tell the enemy that the town bum is the sniper. Since you judge his life to be of least worth in all of the village in terms of future goodness, would it be right to send him to his death? The answer is yes, this act would be the right act as it would promote the happiness in the rest of the village because his life isn't worth the hundreds of lives of women and children (Paraphrased from Joyce, Lecture notes 03/30).

Mill believes that the most desirable things in this world are desirable, "either for the pleasure inherent in themselves, or as means to the promotion of pleasure and the prevention of pain" (597). Therefore, when confronted with two pleasures or acts, one must choose the one that will create the most utility, or happiness and pleasure, for the largest number of people. One might contradict this by saying that men can do without happiness and that happiness isn't the purpose of human life. J.S. Mill rebuts by stating that when these critics talk about happiness, they mean a "continuity of highly pleasurable excitement," which is evidently impossible (600). To Mill, utility includes not only the pursuit of happiness, but the prevention of unhappiness and pain. this proves to be the truest theory of the purpose of human life because happiness is incorporated with the endless pursuit to prevent pain.

Mill also argues that not all forms of pleasure are of equal value. Holding that quality of pleasures is certainly better than quantity, Mill states that, "It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied, better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied" (598). More...

Find Another Essay On On Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism: Are Basic Rights Important? Utilitarianism is based on the

1042 words - 4 pages Utilitarianism: Are Basic Rights Important? Utilitarianism is based on the greatest happiness principle: choose the act that in general will produce the most pleasure while, at the same time, avoiding the most pain. Some agree and some disagree with this principle but the biggest difficulty with this is that it does not leave room for other values and does not take our basic rights as human beings into account. In this paper I will try to make

Higher and Lower Pleasures: Their Effects on Millian Utilitarianism

1443 words - 6 pages In this paper, I examine Mill’s distinction between higher and lower pleasures that he presents in his Utilitarianism. Then, I raise objections to Mill’s distinction by focusing on the ambiguity of his definition of pleasures and his concept of the competent judge. I conclude that, with a recalculation of the definition of pleasures, his distinction of higher and lower pleasures can support a broader theory of utilitarianism. 1. Examining

Utilitarianism, Principles of Mill's utilitarianism with application to "Crime and Punishment" well-organized and good grip on Mill's theory

1672 words - 7 pages "One death, and a thousand lives in exchange--it's simple arithmetic."-RaskolnikovRaskolnikov's mathematical evaluation of the moral dilemma presented to him in Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment exemplifies the empirical view of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism attempts to distinguish between right and wrong by measuring a decision based on its calculated worth. Raskolnikov appears to employ the fundamentals of utilitarianism by pitting the

John Stuart Mill and The Influence of Utilitarianism on Hard Times

1876 words - 8 pages would help sustain society during that time. On the other hand, his father, James Mill was an enthusiast in regards to male voting rights and parliamentary reform in the 19th century England (West 5-8). It is evident that John and his father both had counter arguments in regards to utilitarianism, emphasizing the differences between these two individuals. Charles Dickens himself is considered to be that of an anti-Benthamite, this is because of


760 words - 3 pages Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a consequentialist ethical theory. An action is right or wrong based on its consequences. John Stuart Mill was an important philosopher in developing the idea of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism holds that any action that results in a greater amount of happiness in the world is a right action and any action that results in pain or less happiness is wrong. Utilitarianism can be divided into different


1459 words - 6 pages that most religions follow extreme utilitarianism. In Smart's paper on utilitarianism, he discusses the frequency of actions and decisions being made in a hurry. Smart used the example of a person drowning; however for the sake of change, imagine a different example.You are driving down a fairly deserted road. You see a stranded motorist on the shoulder of the road. There is no time to make a decision, after all if you wait to long, you'll have


1513 words - 6 pages Utilitarianism: J. S. Mills Moral TheoryHeather BradleyGrand Canyon University: PHI - 305May 18, 2014UTILITARIANISM 10Utilitarianism: J. S. Mill's Moral TheoryJohn Stewart Mill was a supporter of utilitarianism as a moral theory. Mill describes utilitarianism as a concept constructed on the theory that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness" (Mill & Crisp


1093 words - 4 pages Utilitarianism The principle of Utilitarianism ‘greatest happiness of the greatest number’ can be traced back to Frances Hutchinson and David Hume of Scotland in the 18th century. Utilitarianism theory was developed first by Jeremy Bentham. His student John Stuart Mill who is the most famous Utilitarian then took on this theory. America had fought for and gained their


1465 words - 6 pages This essay will present the key features of Utilitarianism and identify the problems of Utilitarianism to the extent to which they make Utilitarianism unacceptable. Jeremy Bentham founded Utilitarianism. He lived at a time of great change. With revolutions in France and America, demands were being made for human rights and greater democracy. Bentham worked on legal reform. Utilitarianism is associated with the principle of

Utilitarianism - 1442 words

1442 words - 6 pages should sacrifice your own happiness for greater pleasure of others. For Utilitarianism bases action on pleasure and pain. It clearly takes pleasure to be desirable as it recommends producing greatest pleasure and minimal pain. If something is intrinsically good, it is god in itself no matter what its consequences are. If something is instrumentally good, it is good because of its consequences. A Utilitarian would say that

Utilitarianism - 1671 words

1671 words - 7 pages Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is mainly associated with the principle of Utility summarised by Jeremy Bentham, a social reformer, in 1768. This principle was to apply ‘the greatest good of the greatest number’ theory to all situations that may arise. This theory was that

Similar Essays

A Philosphical Essay On Utilitarianism

660 words - 3 pages Utilitarianism is a way of looking at ethics, it focuses on trying to ensure the maximum happiness in many different ways. There are many different forms of utilitarianism, the four I will discuss are act, rule, naive and preference utilitarianism.Rule utilitarianism tries to give the greatest overall benefit to society, the best rule/law of conduct is found and everyone is found an a rule utilitarian will follow it. However, this can cause

On Utilitarianism And Kantian Ethics Essay

1914 words - 8 pages divided into hypothetical imperatives and categorical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives command people to perform an act to achieve some end of consequence, and it takes the form of “if one is to attain end X, then perform the action Y”. In Classical Utilitarianism, Y is the maximization of overall utility. Kant, however, thinks that hypothetical imperatives rely too heavily on subjective preferences, and thus they are not a proper basis for

With Utilitarianism On The Mind Essay

1573 words - 6 pages theories to consider when working with others and making decisions. One of the theories is utilitarianism, which I believe to be the ideal theory. Utilitarianism would be considering the "greatest good for the greatest number." (Desjardins, Joseph) That would mean that any action you take is for the benefit of everyone and not an individual. I agree with this theory for many reasons. First, when applying utilitarianism to business, it means

Phil 201 Essay On Utilitarianism

1967 words - 8 pages Mill's Utilitarianism held that things and actions were good in proportion to the amount of happiness they engendered and the amount of people they engendered happiness in - in other words, the aim was for the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Utilitarianism further holds that actions are right insofar as they promote happiness and wrong insofar as they promote unhappiness. Mill explains that some kinds of happiness are innately