One Puff Closer to the Grave
Smoking kills. Smoking is the single leading cause of preventable death in the US (smokefree.org.nz). Smoking has already been banned in many indoor facilities, but smoking is still a menace to many people trying to enjoy outdoor events; this is why smoking should be banned in parks and other venues. Of course just as many people will be opposed this idea as those who support it. In any argument, one must be able to be unbiased when considering both sides to an argument, therefore, one must take into consideration both the pros, and cons of smoking being banned in parks and other outdoor facilities. Once all the facts have been weighed and consider, only then can one truly make a choice.
Naturally, there will be a small number of cons that pertain to the idea of banning smoking in parks and other outdoor facilities. One con that may arise in such a situation is that an individual who does partake in smoking cigarettes will be turned off to whatever facility has banned them from smoking outdoors. As an outcome of banning smoking outdoors, certain businesses may lose a small percentage of their clientele. This is such a small price to pay, however, when considering the grand scheme of things.
People tend to fight the idea of banning smoking by throwing the economy in one’s face as a con. Some tend to think that by banning smoking our government will lose more money. This would be a very understandable concern; if it was legitimate.
Another con that could potentially be experience in the banning of smoking is that “Banning smoking in public will encourage people to smoke more at home. This will harm other people in their house, particularly children. This is important, since children are not old enough to choose freely to smoke passively. Also, people smoking at home may drink more alcohol than they would if they went to a bar. This is because they can buy it more cheaply at a supermarket or off-license. Drinking more alcohol may lead to other health problems (Drexel.edu). Is this enough to put a cleaner environment on hold?
The final con that may be associated with a ban on smoking is “It would be impossible to police this ban in many public places. Small workplaces will often ignore the ban and are unlikely to be caught. Staff who do not smoke are unlikely to report smokers, in case their colleagues work out who told the authorities (Drexel.edu). Though this is a legitimate concern, it still would not make enough of a difference to deprive the public of the health they deserve.
Now that the minimal number of cons have been laid out and considered, one can explore all of the pros that come with allowing a ban on smoking in parks and other outdoor facilities. One of these pros is that banning smoking will diminish the number of health concerns that may be faced by being in company of a smoker. Second hand smoke is poisonous. About one non-smoker a day dies from second hand smoke at no fault of their own...