Opposing the Death Penalty
According to death penalty.org the total number of death row victims in the united
states who were wrongfully convicted since the 1970’s is 144. Even though most people
feel that the death penalty is the right approach to someone who has committed or been
accused of murder, there are those who are wrongfully convicted of crimes they did not
commit and the process of pursuing the death penalty is far more expensive than locking
Death row is the part of a prison where those sentenced to death are confined (dictionary). Death row is said to be a way of giving closure to the families of the victim
or victims who were murdered by the suspect ...view middle of the document...
Most of which may be
banned in most countries. That cruel and unusual punishment, one because visually seeing
someone being killed in such a manner is frightening, two knowing your someone will be
killed in such a manner is also frightening and last but not least the severity of the pain
that that person will go through to die.
The first known infliction of the death penalty in America occurred in Jamestown
in 1608. Capital punishment was greatly accepted during the revolutionary war. At the
end of the war 11 colonies had written a new constitution. During the decade of 1790
congress enacted legislation that implemented capital punishment for the crime of
robbery, rape and murder. During the nineteenth century there was a massive increase in
the use of capital punishment with over 1,000 documented executions according to
“Green Mountain Scribes”.
Although committing a crime that is powerful enough for one to be sentenced to
death there are those who have meaningful roles in society that oppose the death
penalty. Albert Camus once said: “we know enough to say that this or that major
criminal deserves hard labor for life. But we don’t know enough to decree that he be
shorn of his future in other words, of the chance we all have of making amends.” There
are people who act out of instant, meaning that they act on situations instead of thinking
before acting on it. After the incident occurs that person may come to an understanding
as to what happen and began to feel remorseful and understand when and how the
mistake fell into play. Everyone has a point in life when they become angry and react
badly to things some people just react to different situations differently. As the saying
goes, “we’re all playing the same game were just on different levels we’re all living in
the same hell we just have different devils”.
Harold Hughes a former senator declared in 1974 that: “thou shalt not kill is the
shortest of the ten commandments uncomplicated by qualification or exception…… it
is as clear and awesomely commanding as the powerful thrust of chain lightning out of a
dark summer sky.” The saying is to say killing someone legally is no different from
killing someone illegally. At the end of the day you’re still killing someone and that
person could be innocent, so if you didn’t make the life you shouldn’t take the life.
These situations leave us to ask how is it fair that the law can take matters into their own
hands and kill someone when the law clearly states it is illegal to commit murder. Some
feel the system is setup to set us up and fail us.
According to Mary Meehan from americanmagazine.org: “there is racial and
economic discrimination in application of the death penalty.” It is said and believed that
there are more African Americans on death row than there are Caucasians. It is sad to say
we are still living in a world where racism exist and is still powerful in some sense. ...