As individuals we make our own choices, decided on what we agree and disagree on, learn from our mistakes, and learn to evaluate a situation when we are wrong. However, in a group the same approach can be taken but it doesn't necessarily mean it will work. Teams are made up of a large group of individuals who each have their own opinion and whose opinions others might not see. Instead of making your own choice, a group choice has to be made where compromises must be formed and unfortunately not everyone will agree with the decision at times. This Organizational Psychology course really tested individuals “teamwork skills” in the most challenging of way, that being to depend on the ...view middle of the document...
It was a yes to both so our group name became Tea-Rex. At first certain group members weren’t to sure about the name but eventually everyone gave in and a name was chosen.
There was never any need to set up a formation of power among my group because everyone seemed to agree with the same things and we all walked in wanting the same thing out of this group, success.
Communication is key and without it groups will not function no matter how much work a person puts into it. The Pygmalion effect is something I wanted to make sure wasn't presented in our group from the very beginning, one of the first things we did was set up a communication channel where information such as cell phone number, emails, and full names were distributed. However, a communication process is not always successful but if thought out correctly there can be many benefits that come from it.
For example, my group and I set up a group messaging account over text messaging which was more of a all channel form of messaging. It was something simple and at the same time effective. This chat was open to every member of our group as was used to ask questions on homework and class updates as well as a motivation source if it was need. While the group message was convenient it wasn't necessarily the best of options because of the overload of messages, however, the gains were grater then my inconvenience of having my phone ring all the time.
Another factor that came into play was downward, upward, and lateral communication and if someone stated that they were able to understand the topic perfectly as a group we gave then the green light to go forward and take the lead. The Grievance System was something my group and I discussed very early on in the semester here we were given some time in class to talk to our group and get to know each other better. By the end of that class we came up with the realization that communication was key and that if there were to ever be any problems we would try to resolve them as a group first and give everyone a fair chance to explain themselves. We were hoping for the best and at the same time preparing for the worst.
Group norms were vital in my opinion because they establish a different environment right of the back and allowed the members in the group to feel at easy as the weeks in class continued. For example, a norm in my group is to ask everyone how their day went. Simple, but what I was able to realize is that the majority of the time when someone asks you how your day went they never actually care its just a form of conversation. In my group however, I was asked how my day had been and explained I had just gotten back to Rutgers from an emergency at home and that I didn't have a chance to read the lecture that was due for that day, instead of being upset my group was understanding and willing to help me.
Something that wasn't part of my groups’ norm was getting a new member added to the team Tea-Rex and...