Origins of the Cold War Author(s): Arthur Schlesinger Jr. Source: Foreign Affairs, Vol. 46, No. 1 (Oct., 1967), pp. 22-52 Published by: Council on Foreign Relations Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20039280 . Accessed: 21/08/2013 03:57
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact email@example.com.
Council on Foreign Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Foreign Affairs.
This content downloaded from 18.104.22.168 on Wed, 21 Aug 2013 03:57:18 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION?FIFTY YEARS AFTER
ORIGINS OF THE COLD WAR By Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.
THE Cold War in its original form was a presumably mortal antagonism, arising in the wake of the Second World War, between two rigidly hostile blocs, one led by the Soviet
Union, the other by the United States. For nearly two somber and dangerous decades this antagonism dominated the fears of
mankind; it may even, on occasion, have come close to blowing up the planet. In recent years, however, the once implacable struggle has lost its familiar clarity of outline. With the passing of old is sues and the emergence of new conflicts and contestants, there is a natural tendency, especially on the part of the generation which grew up during the Cold War, to take a fresh look at the causes of the great contention between Russia and America.
Some exercises in reappraisal have merely elaborated the ortho doxies promulgated in Washington or Moscow during the boom years of the Cold War. But others, especially in the United States (there are no signs, alas, of this in the Soviet Union), represent
what American historians call "revisionism"?that is, a readiness to challenge official explanations. No one should be surprised by this phenomenon. Every war in American history has been fol lowed in due course by skeptical reassessments of supposedly sacred assumptions. So the War of 1812, fought at the time for the freedom of the seas, was in later years ascribed to the expan sionist ambitions of Congressional war hawks; so the Mexican
War became a slaveholders' conspiracy. So the Civil War has been pronounced a "needless war," and Lincoln has even been accused of manoeuvring the rebel attack on Fort Sumter. So too the Spanish-American War and the First and Second World
Wars have, each in its turn, undergone revisionist critiques. It is not to be supposed that the Cold War would remain exempt.
In the case of the Cold War, special factors reinforce the pre dictable...