This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Pain Assessment Week 3 Essay

655 words - 3 pages

Running Head: Week 3Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionMost of pains are usually adopted methods can be regarded as an assessment scale, including:• Verbal Descriptor / a thing Scale (VD / RS) (Kiel 1948),• Numerical rating scale (NRS) (Downie et al. 1978),• The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (Clarke and Spear 1964).DiscussionKiel (1948) developed the VDS, which is based on three to five numerically ranked words such as' No ',' small ',' soft ',' moderate 'and' heavy ', for the evaluation of responses to analgesia over a 24-hour period. Its reliability was established by administering repeated his patients with a painful health condition such as angina, and then studying the trajectory of pain from time-intensity curve, in relation to such factors as physical activity, and treatment.Twenty years later, Melzack and Casey (1968) introduced the present pain intensity (PPI) on a scale of McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), as modified by the VDS, it was a five-point scale with the intensity of the 'no pain' to 'painful'.Most recently, the VDS was used in conjunction with the VAS to measure pain (Bernston and Svensson 2001, resentment and others. 2001, Kamel et al. 2001). Flaherty (1996) described the scale of a complete and useful for patients with chronic and acute pain. Nevertheless, whether to limit the scope of patients with their pain intensity by choosing one word only, although this may not always reflect their experience (McGuire 1988, Flaherty 1996). There is also potential for ambiguity in some of the words used. 'Soft' for one person may mean 'slight pain in another. Severity of pain may also be confused with its frequency. For example, pain can be severe, but not very often. Someone might describe it as more lenient.ConclusionDownie et al. (1978) described the NRS as a horizontal or vertical lines s'0 ', indicating no more, located on the bottom or one limb i'10', indicating severe pain in the upper part or the other. Although the NRS was originally published in...

Find Another Essay On Pain Assessment Week 3

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 7

665 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 7Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionThis is based on the measurement of the six pain-related variables: pain, anxiety, verbal statements on the degree of pain, skeletal muscle response, respiration and the amount of sweat. Although the authors claim that the reliability is satisfactory, the correlation values were not provided

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 5

637 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 5Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionA study by Scott and Huskisson (1976) (N = 100) found no significant differences between the distribution of scores measured in the vertical and horizontal VAS. The ratio between these two scales also proved to be very high (r = 0,99, P <0,001), adding to the reality.DiscussionSome authors

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 6

607 words - 2 pages Running Head: Week 6Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionit is surprising that this Scale is not a "no" or "not alarming 'category. Also noteworthy, that no discussion of its reliability and validity has been presented (McGuire 1988). The second tool, Tursky's (1976) Pain Perception Profile (PPP) have been developed for measuring the intensity of

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 10

661 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 10Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionIt is more suitable for measuring the intensity of pain, rather than its duration and nature over time. VAS is recommended, based on its methodological qualities of reliability, validity, sensitivity and relevance to day operations people. He is also one of the most widely used tools for

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 7

799 words - 3 pages values were not provided. However, to construct validity was assessed with coefficients of correlation between 0.44 and 0.71 for the six variables. The scale was changed 3 years later, Chambers and Price (1967) and 7 years after Bruegel (1971). In the components of pain assessment remains a popular choice among today's researchers. Tools include Crying required to maintain oxygen saturation of more than 95% increase in vital signs

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 11

646 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 11Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionThe VAS can be used reliably in an emergency setting for acute pain experience. Intra-class correlation coefficient with 95% confidence intervals was calculated (0.97, 95% confidence intervals 0.96-0.98) for the measurement of acute pain in adults of respondents was 1 minute every 30 minutes to

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 3

784 words - 3 pages Untitled Running Head: PAIN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain [Writer Name] [Institute Name] Most of them are usually adopted methods can be regarded as an assessment scale, including: • Verbal Descriptor / a thing Scale (VD / RS) (Kiel 1948), • Numerical rating scale (NRS) (Downie et al. 1978), • The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (Clarke and

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 2

754 words - 3 pages Untitled Running Head: PAIN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain [Writer Name] [Institute Name]  Indeed, the experience of pain can go beyond the physiological sense of the situation, which is central to the psychogenic perspective, in which diagnostic tests can not reveal any pathology. Turk and Okifuji (1999) argue that the experience of pain affects the emotional

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 4

743 words - 3 pages Untitled Running Head: PAIN ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain [Writer Name] [Institute Name]  Its main disadvantage is its unreliability for the elderly or very young patients who may not be able to distinguish between the numbers (Flaherty 1996). Although the NRS has more categories than the VDS, they both consist of discrete categories, of which the

Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain-week 12

675 words - 3 pages Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainAs mentioned earlier, Clark and Spear (1964) found the VAS to be sensitive to changes in self-assessed well-being. In addition, it was shown that it reacts to all procedures that alter the experience of pain, for example, the use of pharmacological interventions, as well as changes in intensity in different patients with acute or chronic pain (Belanger et al. 1989, Price et al. 1989, Choiniere et al

Pain Assessment Tools

1240 words - 5 pages Scale. This scale is most effective with patient's age 3 and older. This scale can be used to assess pain in pediatric, cognitively impaired, non-English speaking patients. The scale consists of faces with features ranging from a big smile to tears, lined with a number or letter indicating pain intensity. For assessment consistency, you should use the same scale in the same way each time you assess that patient's pain (Krohn, 2002).These measuring

Similar Essays

Pain Assessment Week 5 Essay

637 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 5Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionA study by Scott and Huskisson (1976) (N = 100) found no significant differences between the distribution of scores measured in the vertical and horizontal VAS. The ratio between these two scales also proved to be very high (r = 0,99, P <0,001), adding to the reality.DiscussionSome authors

Pain Assessment Week 2 Essay

619 words - 2 pages Running Head: Week 2Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionIndeed, the experience of pain can go beyond the physiological sense of the situation, which is central to the psychogenic perspective, in which diagnostic tests can not reveal any pathology. Turk and Okifuji (1999) argue that the experience of pain affects the emotional, social, family

Pain Assessment Week 4 Essay

630 words - 3 pages Running Head: WEEK 4Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionIts main disadvantage is its unreliability for the elderly or very young patients who may not be able to distinguish between the numbers (Flaherty 1996). Although the NRS has more categories than the VDS, they both consist of discrete categories, of which the respondent must choose only one. As

Pain Assessment Week 11 Essay

646 words - 3 pages Running Head: Week 11Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative Pain[Writer Name][Institute Name] Pain Assessment Tool for Postoperative PainIntroductionThe VAS can be used reliably in an emergency setting for acute pain experience. Intra-class correlation coefficient with 95% confidence intervals was calculated (0.97, 95% confidence intervals 0.96-0.98) for the measurement of acute pain in adults of respondents was 1 minute every 30 minutes to