Paper On Why The Death Penalty Shouldn't Be Used

1360 words - 5 pages

Against The Death PenaltyThose who favor the death penalty would argue that violent criminals whom have committed violent crimes deserve to be put to death and that they should die for their crimes. However, with some research one can see that putting criminals to death might not be the best solution after all. The death penalty has been a hot topic of debate for years now. It seems that everyone has an opinion on it one way or another. Some of these include: the death penalty is not an effective deterrent, it is applied unfairly to minorities, several innocent people have been on death row and later found to be innocent and set free, and the death penalty, in most cases, costs more than life in prison. Advocates of the death penalty argue that it is a good form of punishment because it shows potential criminals that committing a crime can bring about dire consequences. At first this seems like a reasonable argument and it seems to make sense, but there is plenty of evidence that suggests otherwise. One reason that the death penalty is not a deterrent, is that most murders are committed in the heat of the moment, out of anger or other strong emotions, according to Time magazine in a article called," Must this man Die?" In fact, premeditated murders make up a very small part of total murders committed; less than 10 percent. Obviously someone who kills another person in a fit of rage is not thinking about the consequences at the time. Someone who kills another person like this is not going to be deterred by the death penalty. Further evidence that proves the death penalty is not a deterrent, is the fact that several states with the death penalty have higher homicide rates than those states without a death penalty. For example in 1996, in Missouri which is a death penalty state, had a rate of murders three times as high per capita as Iowa a non-death penalty state. It is not just Iowa with lower rates either; 10 out of the 12 states without the death penalty have lower homicide rates than the national average, according to the Statistical Abstract of the United States in 1997,17th edition. The reason that these states have lower rates goes back to the fact that most crimes are committed in a fit of anger, and that the consequences do not enter the criminal's mind while they are committing the crime. Knowing this, one can see that the death penalty is not a deterrent and has no effect on which states would have a lower murder rate. It is obvious that the death penalty does not do much as a deterrent if states that do not have it have a lower homicide rate than those that do. A scary thought to consider, is the number of people that have been on death row and been later set free. To date there have been 87 inmates freed after DNA testing proved them to be completely innocent of the crime for which they were convicted. This is an astounding number of people to be sitting on death row when they are completely innocent. If this many...

Find Another Essay On Paper on why the death penalty shouldn't be used

Opinion on the death penalty Essay

1015 words - 4 pages I'm really for the death penalty but it was just easier to be againstOpinion on the Death PenaltyThe death penalty, also referred to as capital punishment, has been abolished in Canada since 1976, but still exist in a few American States. The last execution in Canada took place in 1962.I disagree with the death penalty for several reasons. My first reason is that I find it extremely inhumane to take someone's life in order to demonstrate the

Why the US needs the Death Penalty

2869 words - 11 pages argument about the death penalty and how it should be used in the United States. There are supporting details and historical arguments that reinforce their anti death penalty and pro death penalty stances. The four debates listed above are just brief examples of the debates the different views of death penalty get into. Although the pro-death penalty argument has more historical facts to how and why capital punishment is the most effective way to live

The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

1632 words - 7 pages death penalty itself should be as a human rights violation, and should be abolished. And by removing the death penalty, you would also remove the additional human rights being violated from it being used. Not only does the death penalty go against the right to life, it can also be seen as torture when looking at the death row. In summer 2013, there were over 3000 people on the death row. That's 3000 people waiting to die, but that's not only

Capitol Punishment This paper discusses John Kavenough book and how the death penalty should be illegal

1916 words - 8 pages excusable clause for intentional killing, it is all murder in some way, shape, or form. Kavanaugh very strongly shows in this essay that the death penalty is intentional killing and should be considered as murder.I agree with Kavanaugh on his point of view although I believe he could have stressed his point a little further. We should all ask ourselves, why do we kill people, who kill people, to prove that killing people is wrong? This follows the same

The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

2233 words - 9 pages affords the Death Penalty?'--as School Funding is Red?” (Death penalty info 2009).It is vain to be wasting money that could be budgeted for schools on condemned criminals; let the money be used for better options. (Death penalty info 2009). Death penalty does not deter crime. The kind of people that commit murder cannot be intimidated by death penalty. In an essay wrote by Albert Camus titled “reflections of guillotine” he wrote. In Reflections

The Death Penalty Must Be Abolished

1407 words - 6 pages The death penalty is legal in thirty-two states. I shall argue that capital punishment should be abolished in our country because it is never moral to kill a human being no matter what they have done, because it often costs more money to keep someone on death row than to keep someone in prison for life, because of the men and women who are wrongly accused of a crime they did not commit, and because death is the easy way out. I

Should the Death Penalty be Abolished?

1097 words - 4 pages A Very Short HistoryDeath penalty laws were believed to be established as early as eighteenth century BC in the Code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon. It allowed death for 25 crimes. The fourteenth century BC code of Hittite made all crimes punishable by death. Fifth century BC of Roman Law of Twelve Tablets used crucifixion, drowning, beating to death, burning alive, and impalement as death methods. The first execution in the United States

A Paper Against the Death Penalty

1183 words - 5 pages role in determining who lives and who dies." Vengeance, trust in criminal justice system of the United States, and a prevention effect on offenses and killers are arguments from individuals who support capital punishment. I must say that brutality, irrevocability, and racial discrimination are the main reasons why a death penalty cannot be validated in this country. Moreover, an argument that is always pointed out in the elucidation assumption for

Piracy: Too expensive to stop. This debate essay will try to prove why the governemnt shouldn't be cracking down on piracy.

752 words - 3 pages . The government shouldn't break apart piracy. Although the government knows about all of the piracy happening around the world, I believe that the government shouldn't be wasting their precious time trying to crack down on the many people involved in it. The government shouldn't be cracking down on the people who illegally download because it is a waste of money. "Over 15 million people have or currently download illegal content on the

Capital Punishment. Objective paper on the death penalty, history of, facts etc

1586 words - 6 pages capitalpunishment on the basis of what crimes are punishable by death and if minimum age requirementsare to be set. Many state legislatures have set a minimum age at which such punishment is legal.In other states there is no age limits because the general public opinion opposed it.Currently, there are 34 capital crimes, that is crimes deserving the death penalty, underfederal law (i. e. treason, espionage, the assassination of the President, etc.) while

Why the Federal Government Must Abolish the Death Penalty

1339 words - 5 pages incarcerating the person while he is on death row. (http://www.balancedpolitics.org). Clearly our current system of using the death penalty is too expensive for the US to use. If the federal government were to abolish the death penalty, one of two things would happen. Either the taxes in states with the death penalty would lower or the money that originally went to the death penalty would now be used for something that is beneficial to society

Similar Essays

This Is A Presuasive Essay On Capital Punishment. This Essay Has A Pro Capital Punishment Stance. Argues Against Common Statements Used To Challenge The Death Penalty.

857 words - 3 pages considered the harshest from of punishment enforced today. The most common method used to implement this task is lethal injection; although, the electric chair is still used in some states. The large debate over the death penalty comes from liberal fanatics who use deception and falsehoods to further their cause.Supporters of the death penalty consider capital punishment the only way for true justice to be executed for the severest of crimes

Why The Death Penalty Should Be Terminated

3128 words - 13 pages the United States of America. A socially mature and morally established country should refrain from taking the lives of any of its citizens.      The death penalty is indefensible on three distinct and specific grounds: pragmatic, legal, and moral. The penalty of death is not economically efficient, and is indeed a drain upon the financial resources of our country. Also, it can be proven that the death penalty does not act as a deterrent to

Reason Why Death Penalty Should Be Implimented

885 words - 4 pages punishment. In that way it is more humane and reasonable form punishment Works Cited Alecks, P. (2006, april 18). a timeline of death penalty in the philippines. Retrieved from http://www.pcij.org/blog Schroth, R. (2009, april 13). Top 10 pros and cons should the death penalty be allowed?. Retrieved from http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=002000 Catholics Against Capital Punishment (2006, april 18).Press statement on the commutation of death sentence. Retrieved from http://www.cacp.org/gas.html

The Death Penalty On Trial Essay

2509 words - 10 pages enforcement would beg to differ with such an opinion, we must also consider the 64 percent of death row innocent inmates who lose their life due to careless government antics. Consequently leaving 64 percent of criminals we should be stopping on the street. Thus, Mr. Koch’s assurance to the public ensures that they will only be safe 36 percent of the time. The Bureau of Justice Statistics used a sample of “32,155 prisoners released in 2005” (Cooper