This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Paper On Why The Death Penalty Shouldn't Be Used

1360 words - 5 pages

Against The Death PenaltyThose who favor the death penalty would argue that violent criminals whom have committed violent crimes deserve to be put to death and that they should die for their crimes. However, with some research one can see that putting criminals to death might not be the best solution after all. The death penalty has been a hot topic of debate for years now. It seems that everyone has an opinion on it one way or another. Some of these include: the death penalty is not an effective deterrent, it is applied unfairly to minorities, several innocent people have been on death row and later found to be innocent and set free, and the death penalty, in most cases, costs more than life in prison. Advocates of the death penalty argue that it is a good form of punishment because it shows potential criminals that committing a crime can bring about dire consequences. At first this seems like a reasonable argument and it seems to make sense, but there is plenty of evidence that suggests otherwise. One reason that the death penalty is not a deterrent, is that most murders are committed in the heat of the moment, out of anger or other strong emotions, according to Time magazine in a article called," Must this man Die?" In fact, premeditated murders make up a very small part of total murders committed; less than 10 percent. Obviously someone who kills another person in a fit of rage is not thinking about the consequences at the time. Someone who kills another person like this is not going to be deterred by the death penalty. Further evidence that proves the death penalty is not a deterrent, is the fact that several states with the death penalty have higher homicide rates than those states without a death penalty. For example in 1996, in Missouri which is a death penalty state, had a rate of murders three times as high per capita as Iowa a non-death penalty state. It is not just Iowa with lower rates either; 10 out of the 12 states without the death penalty have lower homicide rates than the national average, according to the Statistical Abstract of the United States in 1997,17th edition. The reason that these states have lower rates goes back to the fact that most crimes are committed in a fit of anger, and that the consequences do not enter the criminal's mind while they are committing the crime. Knowing this, one can see that the death penalty is not a deterrent and has no effect on which states would have a lower murder rate. It is obvious that the death penalty does not do much as a deterrent if states that do not have it have a lower homicide rate than those that do. A scary thought to consider, is the number of people that have been on death row and been later set free. To date there have been 87 inmates freed after DNA testing proved them to be completely innocent of the crime for which they were convicted. This is an astounding number of people to be sitting on death row when they are completely innocent. If this many...

Find Another Essay On Paper on why the death penalty shouldn't be used

Injustices of the Justice System. Why do wrongful convictions of the death penalty occur? This research paper describes many reasons for why wrongful convictions occur

997 words - 4 pages know which person is the suspect, the eyewitness doing the photographic line up understands that the suspect might or might not be in the line up; and the witness is absolutely certain they have identified the right person (http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/392/eyewitness/eyelect01.htm). A noble idea would be to only use the death penalty in cases that do not mainly rely on eyewitness testimony or circumstantial evidence.In conclusion there are

This is a presuasive essay on Capital Punishment. This essay has a pro-capital punishment stance. Argues against common statements used to challenge the death penalty

857 words - 3 pages considered the harshest from of punishment enforced today. The most common method used to implement this task is lethal injection; although, the electric chair is still used in some states. The large debate over the death penalty comes from liberal fanatics who use deception and falsehoods to further their cause.Supporters of the death penalty consider capital punishment the only way for true justice to be executed for the severest of crimes

History of the Death Penalty and Why It Is Not Wrong

4058 words - 17 pages “I personally have always voted for the death penalty because I believe that people who go out prepared to take the lives of other people forfeit their own right to live. I believe that the death penalty should be used only very rarely, but I believe that no-one should go out certain that no matter how cruel, how vicious, how hideous their murder, they themselves will not suffer the death penalty.” – Margaret Thatcher The death penalty

Death Penalty: why it is moral and humane

691 words - 3 pages down without the feeling of pain. The electric chair is no longer used in any state, and it is a rarity to see a prisoner executed by gun or by hanging.As the bottom line, the death penalty should be legal, no questions asked. A human being that murders a fellow human being immediately loses his or her title as anything that relates to human. The Thorndike-Barnhart Student Dictionary has an example under the word human that states as follows

Why the Olympics Shouldn't be Thrown Away

889 words - 4 pages doubt costly, but their cost is for the right reasons. How many countries have an opportunity to show the world what they’re made of, what their culture is like, and how they will separate themselves from the rest of the world? Usually only once or twice, when they are a host of an Olympic games. So why should they not take advantage of this opportunity to show the entire world what they are made of? Money should also be used on the facilities

Capital Punishment~Right or Wrong? Essay about the different views involving the death penalty and why they might feel that way

646 words - 3 pages most ofthem are deeply antisocial." (Just Revenge, Mark Costanzo,PH.D.)Of course mistakes can be made, which means even theinnocent can be convicted and exectuted for crimes they didnot commit. The death penalty is irrevocable, you can nevertake it back. "In case of a mistake, the executed prisonercannot be given another chance. Justice can miscarry. Inthe last hundred years there have been more than 75documented cases of wrongful conviction of

The Death Penalty on Trial

2509 words - 10 pages enforcement would beg to differ with such an opinion, we must also consider the 64 percent of death row innocent inmates who lose their life due to careless government antics. Consequently leaving 64 percent of criminals we should be stopping on the street. Thus, Mr. Koch’s assurance to the public ensures that they will only be safe 36 percent of the time. The Bureau of Justice Statistics used a sample of “32,155 prisoners released in 2005” (Cooper

Opinion on the death penalty

1015 words - 4 pages I'm really for the death penalty but it was just easier to be againstOpinion on the Death PenaltyThe death penalty, also referred to as capital punishment, has been abolished in Canada since 1976, but still exist in a few American States. The last execution in Canada took place in 1962.I disagree with the death penalty for several reasons. My first reason is that I find it extremely inhumane to take someone's life in order to demonstrate the

The Death Penalty on Trail

897 words - 4 pages do personally. However, our thirst for revenge may be keeping us from finding a better alternative to the death penalty. Perhaps the act of revenge is worth additional consideration at this point. To begin with, we must acknowledge, “considering revenge is a very human response to feeling slighted” (Prince), thus it is normal to react according to how we feel. Even so, our situation often requires us to control how many times we let these

The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

1632 words - 7 pages death penalty itself should be as a human rights violation, and should be abolished. And by removing the death penalty, you would also remove the additional human rights being violated from it being used. Not only does the death penalty go against the right to life, it can also be seen as torture when looking at the death row. In summer 2013, there were over 3000 people on the death row. That's 3000 people waiting to die, but that's not only

The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

1608 words - 7 pages severity are not the definite solutions to keep people away from wounding each other and because of its hazardous impact on them, capital punishment should be abolished since it contains a high risk of an unfair justice system, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, and it does not deter crime. Primarily, death penalty may have a high precarious hazard, especially on human life. For over centuries, abundant crimes have

Similar Essays

Why The Death Penalty Should Be Terminated

3128 words - 13 pages the United States of America. A socially mature and morally established country should refrain from taking the lives of any of its citizens.      The death penalty is indefensible on three distinct and specific grounds: pragmatic, legal, and moral. The penalty of death is not economically efficient, and is indeed a drain upon the financial resources of our country. Also, it can be proven that the death penalty does not act as a deterrent to

Reason Why Death Penalty Should Be Implimented

885 words - 4 pages punishment. In that way it is more humane and reasonable form punishment Works Cited Alecks, P. (2006, april 18). a timeline of death penalty in the philippines. Retrieved from http://www.pcij.org/blog Schroth, R. (2009, april 13). Top 10 pros and cons should the death penalty be allowed?. Retrieved from http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=002000 Catholics Against Capital Punishment (2006, april 18).Press statement on the commutation of death sentence. Retrieved from http://www.cacp.org/gas.html

Why The Us Needs The Death Penalty

2869 words - 11 pages argument about the death penalty and how it should be used in the United States. There are supporting details and historical arguments that reinforce their anti death penalty and pro death penalty stances. The four debates listed above are just brief examples of the debates the different views of death penalty get into. Although the pro-death penalty argument has more historical facts to how and why capital punishment is the most effective way to live

Why The Federal Government Must Abolish The Death Penalty

1339 words - 5 pages incarcerating the person while he is on death row. (http://www.balancedpolitics.org). Clearly our current system of using the death penalty is too expensive for the US to use. If the federal government were to abolish the death penalty, one of two things would happen. Either the taxes in states with the death penalty would lower or the money that originally went to the death penalty would now be used for something that is beneficial to society