This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Parliament Versus President Essay

1661 words - 7 pages

In this paper I will compare and contrast the presidential and parliamentary institutional structures. I will also explain how they differ in the relationship of the executive, legislature and judiciary. I will discuss how the Canadian system should be identified and if its organization changed over time. The impact of the constitutional changes of 1982 with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and if it improved or eroded the quality of Canadian democracy will also be explained and in this paper.
A parliamentary system is “a system of governing in which there is a close interrelationship between the political executive (prime minister and Cabinet) and Parliament (the legislative or law-making body). He executive is generally composed of members of the House of Commons (the elected parliamentary body) and must maintain the support of the House of Commons.” (Mintz, 2012).
In a parliamentary system there is a responsible government which means that both the Cabinet and the prime minister who is the political executive are held accountable for the actions of the Parliament. For the Prime Minister and the Cabinet to remain in office must gain the support of the elected members of the Parliament. The Parliament in Britain is referred to as the Westminster system and the rule in this particular Parliament is a single party majority rule, executive dominance of Parliament, and an adversarial relationship between the governing party and the opposition (Mintz, 2012). India, Canada, Australia, and several Caribbean countries are made up based on the Westminster system of Britain but have a few differences. (Mintz, 2012).
Parliamentary systems usually have tight relationships of both legislative and executive powers. The power that the Cabinet and the prime minister have is limited. Ordinary members of the Parliament also have considerable roles. The Cabinet and the prime minister are responsible for the actions of the House of Commons. In the Westminster parliamentary system, the majority government is the measure and it aids and promotes forceful action by the government. It can also promote the liability of the government to the people, as appreciate or criticize the laws or actions of the government.
The Parliament has to approve new laws and the modifications of the current laws. The Cabinet and the prime minister propose the laws that are passed by the government. Taxing plans and government’s spending is presented by the Cabinet and the prime minister to the Parliament for approval. In current parliamentary systems, political parties play a central role in the operational process of the governing system. (Mintz, 2012). Majority government is when the prime minister’s party has the majority of the House of Commons; therefore a single party forms the government (Mintz, 2012).
If the members are not elected by a single party to a majority of seats in the House of Commons, one party may make a minority government. (Mintz, 2012). A minority government...

Find Another Essay On Parliament versus President

What are the relative merits and drawbacks of parliamentary and presidential systems? Why have most East European countries adopted parliamentary systems?

2723 words - 11 pages There has been much argument amongst political academics concerning the virtues and failures of both parliamentary and presidential systems. While all systems of governance vary from country to country, parliamentary systems can broadly be defined as where the executive, in the form of a prime minister and his cabinet are drawn from the elected legislature (parliament). In presidential systems however the executive (president) is elected

The comparison of parliamentary political system in Sweden and semi-presidential political system in France and the results for Turkey

3339 words - 13 pages majority government and cooperation between the cabinet and parliament are replaced (Foley and Owens, 1996). This constitution has two major implications, on the one hand, it preserves parliamentary system, and on the other hand, it functions as a presidential regime. By this constitution, presidents are given important rights. For example, a president has right to dissolve the parliament, the president is responsible for the protection and

What are the advantages of Parliamentarism

2412 words - 10 pages in the first past the post, winner takes all approach inherent to most presidential electoral systems, as was the outcome with Bush versus Gore US presidential election of 2000, this scenario hands an almost crusade like mandate to a president who only has the backing of a small section of the populous. Because of the internalised nature of the US system of government this scenario leads, at worst, to four or eight years of frustration and

Russia and Ukraine: The Beginning of World War III?

1485 words - 6 pages increased, the government and opposition agreed upon an amnesty for arrested protestors, but only if the demonstrators vacated captured government buildings. The opposition has also agreed that Ukrainian parliament would discuss changing the Constitution to reduce the power of the president, but when it was made public that the topic was declined to be on the agenda, the protestors' passion was rekindled and they marched on parliament (“Why Is

Discussion on the Secularism of Turkey in it's politics, culture and international relations

3507 words - 14 pages . But, on October 29, 1923 a motion was enacted that would enable more freedom to the Council of Ministers, and that the nation would reform into a Republic. The members of the Assembly elected the president for one term. He would then select the Prime Minister from the Parliament. The Prime Minister would then select other ministers from the Parliament, and the President would present the list to the Assembly for approval.The next constitution

Design flaws in the US constitution

1211 words - 5 pages representatives’ priorities to reflect less what their constituents want, and more of what rich lobbyists want. The Constitution's First Amendment for free speech protects the rights of those individuals who choose to spend money as their way of “expressing” themselves. As is exemplified in the recent cases of Citizens United versus the Federal Election Commission and McCutcheon versus the Federal Election Commission where both cases provided the

The 1979 Revolution and Modern Day Iran

1682 words - 7 pages million by 2040. According to the OECD statistics, population growth of the country was 17.6 million from 1990 to 2008 (CIA World Factbook). The Elections On national level, Iran elects the president, legislatures and assembly experts. The president is elected by the people and serves for four years. The Iranian parliament is composed of 240 members who are elected to serve for four years as well. The voting age in Iran is 18 years. Since the

Turkey, A Poli-Historical Analysis

2175 words - 9 pages . With an Islamic majority in Parliament dramatic changes are inevitable. Press in the United States has been minimal because the country is a half a world away; however, the citizens of this nation should be concerned. 'The United States over the past 10 years has supplied Turkey with $5.3 billion in military aid,' such extraordinary power with an abrupt shift in leadership will be very dangerous within the country and internationally. To predict

The Cold War and Reagan

1404 words - 6 pages The Cold War and Reagan Topics What was the cold war? What were the causes? The Cold War at Home. -The U.S. involvement. What major roles did President Reagan serve in the cold war? A cold war is defined as "a conflict between nations for national advantage conducted by political, economic, and psychological means instead of direct military action." The Cold War defined by the same source was determined to be "the

Bill of Rights

1724 words - 7 pages The “Bill of rights” had been proposed as a follow up to Parliament’s original Habeas Corpus bill, which safeguarded personal freedom and liberty. Now just about every colony had a bill of rights, so James Madison suggested that if the United States was to survived as a a country it would need to have a set of rules versus thirtheen and every state would have the same rules. In 1789, James Madison proposed a series of legislative articles to

Confederation and Constitution

1451 words - 6 pages up a new arrangement of government. Groundbreaking war conqueror George Washington, a delegate from Virginia, was elected convention president. During an exhaustive debate, the delegates invented a brilliant federal organization characterized by an complicated system of checks and balances. The convention was divided over the issue of state representation in Congress, as more-populated states sought comparative legislation, and smaller states

Similar Essays

Are Prime Ministers Or Presidents Generally More Powerful?

1221 words - 5 pages Within parliamentary systems, the government i.e. the legislature consist of the political party with the most popularly elected Members of Parliament (MPs) in the main legislative parliament e.g. the House of Commons in the United Kingdom. The Prime Minister is appointed by the party to lead as the executive decision-maker, and the legislature work to support and carry out their will (Fish, 2006). In presidential systems, the President is

Parliamentary And Presidential Systems Of Government

2935 words - 12 pages . The political party tends to be highly disciplined and cohesive in parliament, as it cannot afford to lose a vote of non-confidence. Looking at these two differences the president has more power in terms of being confident in his position. However, according to Beer, the strength of the prime minister exerts “greater power than a President.” The vulnerability of the prime minster’s position can be viewed as a positive aspect as well

Does Australia Need A Federal Bill Of Rights?

2055 words - 8 pages The Commonwealth of Australia was established in 1901 when the former British colonies agreed to federate and become the six states we know today along with the two territories. Federation brought about the creation of two vital aspects for managing this new nation: parliament and the Constitution. Australia's system of government is based on liberal democratic traditions, where its conventions and practices are derived from both British and

Russia And Ukraine: The Beginning Of World War Iii?

829 words - 4 pages increased, the government and opposition agreed upon an amnesty for arrested protestors, but only if the demonstrators vacated captured government buildings. The opposition has also agreed that Ukrainian parliament would discuss changing the Constitution to reduce the power of the president, but when it was made public that the topic was declined to be on the agenda, the protestors' passion was rekindled and they marched on parliament (“Why Is