This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Parliamentary And Presidential Systems Of Government

2935 words - 12 pages

Introduction:
Throughout history there has been progression on how the government has been organized and, alternatively, its position, and role in the public sphere. Two dominant, different government systems have emerged in North American politics, the presidential and parliamentary systems, in America and Canada respectively. These neighbouring systems have components, which are different but also share some commonalities; these key characteristics propose several strengths and weaknesses among them.
Even though the presidential system provides stability of position during the president’s ruling term, the inability to pass laws swiftly in the legislature postpones any active political change, thus the parliamentary system of Canada is a more balanced and reliable system of government in regards to passing bills and making a significant change. However, in terms of power, the president has more control over the vast majority of the country. The prime minister, although still powerful, is restricted by the vote of non-confidence, and is vulnerable to losing his position at any time. A recent event that occurred in America from October 1st to 16th 2013, involved the US federal government temporarily shutting down, after congress failed to enact legislation appropriating funds for 2014. This indicates the potential unpredictability and instability of the American system. In justification to this, differences and similarities amongst both systems will be accounted for, as well as the strengths and flaws that follow in order to evaluate which system offers a better balance overall.

Part I: Features of the Parliamentary and Presidential Systems of Government
Role of the Head of State and Government:
The parliamentary system of government dates back to 18th century Great Britain, in which many countries including Canada, have adopted key characteristics from. One of the features of this system is that it functions with a separate head of state and head of government. For instance, the Queen functions as the head of the entire system, as she is symbolically above all other government officials and may even act as the ‘guardian’ of the entire constitution (even though there is a head of government who actually directs the work of the executive.) The strength of having a head of state is that they act as a referee and keep the system and keeping the head of government in check. Despite this, a criticism of the parliamentary system is that the people cannot directly elect the head of government. In contrast to this, the presidential or congressional system of government in the United States has one official, in this case the president, which fulfills both of these positions. In the USA there is no one above the president that can make authoritative decisions. The president is both the head of state and head of government and derives much authority from this dual status. This is beneficial; in that all the power remains within one person who...

Find Another Essay On Parliamentary and Presidential Systems of Government

Strenghts and Weaknesses of Presidential Systems

1252 words - 5 pages The topic of this essay is „Presidential systems – strenghts and weaknesses.“ I chose this topic because I am very interested into the comparison of presidential and parliamentary systems. For quiet a long time, I have been trying to figure out which one is better for countries. This essay might be a good stepping stone for me to figure it out. This essay will go step by step analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of presidential systems

Presidential form of government Essay

2049 words - 8 pages Presidential form of GovernmentNATURE OF THE SYSTEM:Presidential form of government , is a government in which the chief executive is not responsible to the legislature. Bagehot, " the independence of the legislative and the executive powers is the specific quality of presidential government just as fusion and combination is the principle of cabinet government". If we compare cabinet and presidential systems , we can find that they are both

DEMERITS OF PARLIAMENTARY FORM OF GOVERNMENT

3036 words - 12 pages Introduction to Parliamentary government: In a democracy,governments are classified on the basis of relationship of the political executive with the legislative branch. If the executive is answerable and responsible to the legislature it is called Cabinet form of Government or Parliamentary form of government,while if the legislative and executive are completely seperate from each other it is called as presidential form of government

The comparison of parliamentary political system in Sweden and semi-presidential political system in France and the results for Turkey

3339 words - 13 pages INTRODUCTIONDemocracy is spreading all around the world in different forms. Countries shape democracy according to their own needs and political structures. So, democracy as a political system is represented in different ways in the world. Two of the more common appearing style of democracy in the political structures of the countries' is presidential and parliamentary political systems. Parliamentary and presidential political systems also have

Federal and unitary systems of government

1168 words - 5 pages they strive towards a centralised presidential government.Unitary government however is not completely centralised in its approach. Like federalism, unitary systems often look to the lower levels of government for assistance and to take on more responsibility. Although unitary government is, in definition, hierachal, there are often times when the two levels of government meet to bargain with political responsibility.In the 1970s democratic Spain

Government and Electoral Systems

1196 words - 5 pages apartheid system introduced. Drawing from the ideologies of Norris and Blais, the major differences between majoritarian and proportional representation and as well as the two electoral systems that allow for accountability and social representation go into the argument for proportional representation for South African government. An electoral system is defined as what defines the processes by which votes are translated into seats in the process of

Presidential government in usa- merists and de merits

3241 words - 13 pages . The nation looks to him to steer the country through any kind of national emergency.The presidential system also makes it possible the appointment of experts to head the various departments of the government without consideration of their party affiliations. A prime minister in a parliamentary form cannot do this .If the cabinet is to work as a team, it must consist of people who think alike and belong to the same party to act alike.The

UK's Constitution: The Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty

2184 words - 9 pages Parliamentary sovereignty, a core principle of the UK's constitution, essentially states that the Parliament is the ultimate legal authority, which possesses the power to create, modify or end any law. The judiciary cannot question its legislative competence, and a Parliament is not bound by former legislative provisions of earlier Parliaments. The ‘rule of law’ on the other hand, is a constitutional doctrine which primarily governs the

UK, US and Russian Government Systems

2271 words - 10 pages The United States of America, United Kingdom, and Russia all have different ways of controlling their country. There are three models of democracy: parliamentary, presidential and semipresidential systems (O’Neil, 2007). A presidential system represents the minority of democratic systems around the world. Parliamentary systems can be found in a majority of democracies around globally (O’Neil, 2007). Lastly, there is a semipresidential system

Nixon and the Notion of Presidential Power

1699 words - 7 pages opinion, he was not convinced that the Presidential elections would be the ultimate check. Rather, Lincoln asserted that the success of the actions taken by a government to preserve its interest and peace cannot be measured by the electorate but rather by the final outcome of the actions. Nixon's opinion, however, differed. Richard Nixon saw the ultimate check not in the result or consequences of his actions, but rather in the response of the

Industrial revolution and the two different government systems it produced

885 words - 4 pages Topic: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Capitalism and Communism that were created during the Industrial revolution.The Industrial Revolution sparked two totally different forms of government and societies. Capitalism and Communism both were new and they both had good and bad sides to them. In this essay I am going to evaluate those points and pass my view on which society is betterIndustrial revolution was a great change in the way

Similar Essays

Parliamentary And Presidential Systems Essay

1828 words - 7 pages When looking at the different political systems across the world, parliamentary and presidential systems can be seen as two eminent and highly successful democracy as used most famously by Britain the United States respectively. Due to their difference in the system of governing, the role of an Australian Prime Minister may vary from that of an American President. Thus, differentiation of the system may incur a verity of responsibility and

Comparing And Contrasting Two Governmental Systems: Parliamentary Vs Presidential

763 words - 3 pages Parliamentary System versus Presidential System The way that a country is controlled by the government depends on the relationship between the legislative and executive authority. Most democratic nations, today, generally use one of two governmental systems, either a parliamentary system or a presidential system. Today most of Europe prefers to use a parliamentary system, whereas the presidential form of government is preferred in places such

What Are The Relative Merits And Drawbacks Of Parliamentary And Presidential Systems? Why Have Most East European Countries Adopted Parliamentary Systems?

2723 words - 11 pages not pose a problem if the executive and the legislature have the same ambition, if they disagree there is no democratic principle upon which the deadlock can be solved. Linz suggests that in extreme cases this has led the armed forces to act as a mediator.The fixed term of office ascribed to a president is often held up as an example of the stability afforded by presidential government. In parliamentary systems it is possible to have a change of

Types Of Democratic Governmental Systems: Presidencial And Parliamentary Systems

1402 words - 6 pages . Theoretical background Parliamentarism and presidentialism are commonly, and correctly, set in opposition as distinguishable systems of governance that exhibit distinguishable structural features .Lijphart outlines three main differences between presidential and parliamentary systems: a) in parliamentary systems the head of government requires the confidence of the legislature in order to stay in power, while in a presidential system the President