Part 1 Contract Law: Albion Ltd.

1195 words - 5 pages

The area of law in this story is Contract law. A ‘contract’ is a written legally binding agreement consisting of typically an offer and acceptance, between individuals or companies, who have to fulfil the legal requirements.
The contract involved as stated, an “offer”, which is a communication of willingness to carry out an action on certain circumstances, which are made with the purpose that an compulsory agreement will exist once it is accepted, and an ‘acceptance’ which is the ultimate and complete agreement to all of the terms of the offer.
There are two types of offer, which are; ‘unilateral offer’, that is capable of being made to the world as whole- Bowerman v ABTA, and ‘bilateral offer’ which is made to a certain individual or group.
In this specific story, it can be seen that, there has been a bilateral offer that is made to certain individuals which are in the same category of expertise; who are Basil and David, which were offered the same job by Albion Ltd.
As they both requested further detail rather than providing a clear acceptance, it can be seen that the offer can still be considered as open.
It can also be seen that a short period after on May 22nd, there had been a bilateral offer by Albion Ltd to Basil only, offering a job of becoming the sole distributor of the stapler with a 10% commission. Albion Ltd makes it clear that, if an answer is not received by 31 May, it will be assumed that it is acceptable to him.
In order to get an acceptance, it must be considered that it is unequivocal and unconditional, and that the general rule of the acceptance is followed, therefore the acceptance must be communicated to the other party- Entores v Miles Far East Corporation.
An acceptance to an offer can be a written document, orally accepted, and by conduct- Brogden v Metropolitan
The postal acceptance rule makes it clear that the acceptance occurs immediately the letter is validly posted- Adams v Lindsell.
The action of Basil posting a first class letter to Albion Ltd confirming his acceptance to the offer shows that there has been an unequivocal and unconditional acceptance which is communicated to Albion Ltd in a written form.
Therefore, an agreement between Albion Ltd and Basil had been made as there had been an offer and acceptance.

A ‘revocation’ for the offer is divided into two by; ‘bilateral contracts’ where an offer can be revoked before the acceptance- Payne v Cave, and must be communicated to the offeree- Byrne v Van Tienhoven and ‘unilateral contracts’, which when made, involve an implication of undertaking the person who receives and accepts an offer, the courts may indicate that the responsibility the accepter would be given, would be a rational opportunity to perform the contract- Errington v Errington and Woods.

In this case, it is clear to see an attempted revocation made by Albion Ltd, as they telephoned Basil to tell that the post of sole distributor is no longer...

Find Another Essay On Part 1 Contract Law: Albion Ltd.

Does_the_Doctrine_of_Promissory_Estoppel_Alleviate_the_Unfair_Effect_of_Consideration Essay

4144 words - 17 pages essential for us to have a basic understanding of the background, purpose and workings of this doctrine. Promissory estoppel originated from the doctrine of waiver (law of giving-up oneǯs rights).17 It is basically a doctrine that allows the enforcement of contracts without 12 ibid 149. 13 ibid 14 Mindy Chen- Wishart, Contract Law, Oxford University Press, 2005, 160. 15 Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1 16 Mindy

Contract Law Consideration Essay

5924 words - 24 pages essential for us to have a basic understanding of the background, purpose and workings of this doctrine. Promissory estoppel originated from the doctrine of waiver (law of giving-up oneǯs rights).17 It is basically a doctrine that allows the enforcement of contracts without 12 ibid 149. 13 ibid 14 Mindy Chen- Wishart, Contract Law, Oxford University Press, 2005, 160. 15 Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1 16 Mindy

COntract law

1285 words - 6 pages that all Quanter Ltd staff should fully understand what is an exemption clause? And what is the purpose of it in order to avoid the possibility to be sued. An exemption clause is a term of a contract that seeks to either limit or exclude liability for breaches of the contract. They act as contractual defences . In order for an exemption clause to be fully incorporated into the Quanter Ltd contract, or for any contract for that matter, there are

Business Law

650 words - 3 pages It is a question concern the law of contracts in particular, the law of misrepresentation. It is my objective to identify the difficult concept of different kind of misrepresentation and analyze why it is problematic. Misrepresentation is a false statement designed to encourage the other party to enter a contract. To prove a statement to be a misrepresentation, 7 essential conditions must be satisfied: 1.     A

Contract Law

1255 words - 5 pages The law recognizes both types of the contents of a contract, that is, expressed and implied and has its implication when looked from the Customary, Common law, and Statutory perspectives. But, before discussing the implication of the implied contents of a contract under different legal perspectives, there is a need to comprehend the core meaning of the terminology 'implied content of a contract'.The Definition The dictionary (Cobuild, 1996

Caveat Emptor Sales of Good Act Implied Terms

1694 words - 7 pages Rowland v Divall [1932] 2 KB 500 Shine v General Guarantee Corporation [1988[ 1 ALL ER 911 Stevenson v Rodgers [1999] 1 ALL ER 613 Legislation: Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994 Sale of Goods Act 1979, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, s6 Directives: Council Directive 1999/44/EC of the 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees Law Reports: Law Commission, Sale and Supply of Goods (Law Com No 160 1987

Legal Case Study

1859 words - 7 pages cannot apply. In fact, the clause “liberty to carry on deck” is inadequate even if the contract stated that goods are being carried on deck and are so carried, the Hague Visby rules do not apply. The carrier and the shipper are free to negotiate their own terms of carriage subject only to the operation of the common law.( JCT Chauh, p 273, 8-11). Art 1© Rules are satisfied only if: * The cargo must


1443 words - 6 pages client. A typical consumer should identify with the actual words used and how the terms influence the parties’ rights and obligations. To conclude, the clarifying remarks above it ought to grant clearness so that Enterprise Ltd steers clear of certain traps which may possibly consider both clauses as useless. It is vital that Enterprise Ltd proceed with the guidance given to make sure that the clauses are line with UTCR and UTCRR instructions. Even if there is no promise that the terms incorporated will be successful. Word count: 1,464 Bibliography Books Catherine Elliot & Frances Quinn, Contract Law, 9th edition Ewan Mckendrick, Contract law, 10th edition

Pre registration contracts

1529 words - 6 pages The common law view of pre-registration contracts was that the company did not exist for legal purposes until it had been formally incorporated (registered). This common law view resulted in company’s being unable to enter a binding contract until they had been registered.      However “given the delays which can be encountered in the registration process, the promoter of a company may wish to enter into contracts `for

Contracts Assignment Final - Questions and Answers

3682 words - 15 pages Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337.] [58: Wilkie v Gordian Runoff Ltd (2005) 221 CLR 522 at 528-9.] [59: (2004) 218 CLR 451 at [22].] [60: Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] 1 All ER 667 at [64].] Instead of being centred on an ambiguity, interpretation of the terms of a contract now occurs from the perspective of a reasonable businessperson.[footnoteRef:61] This businessperson will be placed in the

Corporations Law: Optimum Insurance

3559 words - 14 pages executive director had the authority to exercise his powers as an individual with express or implied authority under s. 126(1) on behalf of OI Ltd and therefore created a binding and valid contract. The next day, Harry created a 'rival' company Shifty Insurance Pty Ltd for which he wholly owned and was the sole director. He then proceeded to divert the original agreement between OI Ltd and ITO and executed a contract to exist between his own

Similar Essays

The War On Drugs: Failures Of The Drug Law Part 1

1685 words - 7 pages law: a psychological analysis of drug prohibition." Psychological Bulletin 113.3 (1993): 497. 9. Mark W. Miller, “Alcohol and Drug Abuse among U.S. Veterans”. Journal of Traumatic Stress February 2013, 26, 71–76 10. Morris, Stephen D., "Latin Americanist" Mar2013, vol. 57 issue 1, p43-64.p22 11. Nadelmann, E. The Case for Legalization. The Public Interest. 1988;92:3-17 12. Nicklin, Julie L, “Chronicle of Higher Education.” 6/9/2000, Vol. 46 Issue

Business Law Essay

2044 words - 8 pages consideration for a contract entered into C, with C making some other promise.[1: P. Gillies and N. Selvadurai, Law of Contract 2009 p 78]In the words of Lord Moulton in Halibut, Symons Co v Bulckleton [1913] IC 30 at 47:"If you make such a contract I will give you 100 pounds" is in every sense of the word a complete legal contract[2: R.B. Vermeesch and K.E Lindgren, Business Law of Australia Edition 11 p 153 ]The collateral contract must be made

Specific Performance, Doctrine Of Privity, Essay

1161 words - 5 pages i) Dixon J in J C Williamson Ltd v Lukey Mulholland 1 explained that specific performance is 'in the proper sense, a remedy to compel the execution in specie of a contract which requires some definite thing to be done before the transaction is complete and the parties' rights are settled in the manner intended'.Specific performance is a principle which is usually applied when other remedies or damages are inadequate to remedy the breach of

Analysis Of The Types Of Law In A Case Study

2204 words - 9 pages Big Deal Ltd does not satisfy s.11 (1) of the Unfair Contract terms Act. This section applies the reasonableness test to the context of the scenario: 'In relation to a contract term, the requirement of reasonableness for the purposes of this part of this Act [and section 3 of the Misrepresentation Act 1967] is that the term shall have been a fair and reasonable one to be included having regard to the circumstances which were, or ought reasonably