This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Social Contract Theorists: Hobbes Vs. Rousseau This Paper Compares And Contrasts Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau And Then I Discuss Who I Think Has The Stronger Position And Why.

1754 words - 7 pages

Thomas Hobbes believes that all people are naturally evil, hostile, and self-seeking whereas Jean Jacques Rousseau claims that all people are naturally good people and generally happy. I plan to prove that Rousseau has the stronger position of the two contract theorists.Thomas Hobbes claims all people are hostile and naturally self-seeking. Hobbes's claims when two people have a desire for the same resource the natural result is war. The state of nature, as deemed by Hobbes, is the "natural condition of mankind" that what would exist if there were no government, no civilization, no laws, and no common power to restrain human nature. The state of nature is a "war of all against all," in which human beings constantly seek to destroy each other in a never-ending pursuit for power. Life in the state of nature is "poor, nasty, brutish and short." In the state of nature, no security is possible and life is full of horror, because of this they want to leave the state of nature. Hobbes defines a "natural man" as an inhabitant of the state of nature who escape from their natural condition by making a contract with each other to create the Leviathan.Two natural passions enable people to escapes the state of nature: fear and reason. Fear makes the natural man want to escape the state of nature; reason shows him how to escape. Reason provides the natural laws that Hobbes develops; "A natural law" is defined as a general rule discovered by reason that forbids a person from doing anything destructive to her own life and gives her the right of self-preservation. A few of the laws of nature are as follows. 1) the natural man, in order to preserve life, must seek peace. 2) We must mutually give up certain rights (such as the right to take another person's life) in order to escape the state of horror in nature. 3) it is not enough to simply make contracts, but we are required to keep the contracts we make. Because the laws of nature state that human beings must strive for peace, this is how the social contract comes into play. In the social contract, people surrender certain rights on the condition that others do likewise i.e. I will agree not to kill you if you agree not to kill me. People agreeing to the contract maintain only those rights over others that they are content for everyone else to maintain over them. In exchange for giving up these rights, people now have the protection of the Sovereign from each other and outside forces as well.When people leave the state of nature they form the social contract and agree to give power over to the Sovereign who is the head of the Leviathan, this is the form of a just political state. This sovereign would be recognized by the people as part of the contract, given the individual powers and wills of all, and authorized to punish anyone who breaks the contract. The sovereign controls with absolute authority. The threat of punishment reinforces the mandates of the laws of nature, and ensures the function of the social...

Find Another Essay On Social contract theorists: Hobbes vs. Rousseau This paper compares and contrasts Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau and then I discuss who I think has the stronger position and why.

Questionaire: Jean- Jacques Rousseau and The Social Contract

1266 words - 5 pages Ques: “The problem is to find a form of association… in which each, while uniting himself with all, may still obey himself alone, and remain as free as before.” Does Rousseau have a convincing solution to the problem he poses? In the 1700’s Jean- Jacques Rousseau wrote The Social Contract. During this time, the social contract was fairly new theory. It stated in order to have a democracy laws were needed which caused everyone to give up

Locke, Hobbes and Rousseau Essay

2084 words - 8 pages its rise in political life to coordinate the realationships between people it is required in morality to preserve the basic principles. Why do I think the pleasure of whole instead of my own happiness? To answer this question it would be better primarily to look upon at the human nature. If we assume that people are egoistic and they only pay attention to their own utility, then we can affirm that they can anticipate that if he hurts other

Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and Machiavelli

2342 words - 9 pages .6, 2000] United States Military Academy [no date]. "Prophets of Modern Science". Available: * From Block I/Shaping Modern Mentality.htm* [Oct. 6, 2000] Bibliography: Weber, Eugen. Edited version of The Social Contract, by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. The Western Tradition: Renaissance to the Present (Los Angeles: D.C. Heath and Company, 1995), 225. ---- Edited version of The

Comparison of Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes, and the Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Mankind, by Jean-Jacques Rousseau

1289 words - 5 pages ., Thomas. "Leviathan". Self andSociety: University of California,Santa Cruz. Massachusetts. Pearson Custom Publishing, 2003. 373-398.Palaver, Wolfgang. Mimesis and Scapegoating in the Words of Hobbes, Rousseau, and Kant. 26 February 2003. and Idea Systems. 27 February 2003. Parameters. 27 February 2003., Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract and The First and Second Discourses. Yale University, 2002.

Thomas Hobbes and the Social Contract

1634 words - 7 pages Thomas Hobbes was the first philosopher to connect the philosophical commitments to politics. He offers a distinctive definition to what man needs in life which is a successful means to a conclusion. He eloquently defines the social contract of man after defining the intentions of man. This paper will account for why Hobbes felt that man was inherently empowered to preserve life through all means necessary, and how he creates an

Hobbes and Rousseau, The State of Nature

1528 words - 7 pages prevent the chaos that would come from the lack of civilization. If society is able to turn men bad, then it also has the ability to turn them good. Without society there is no schooling, education or any form of thought. The importance of these systems on society and its inhabitants is limitless. Hobbes’ argument about the state of nature is far more reasonable, stating how man can escape the state of the total war. This is done through what he

It compares Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau in regards to social contract, the state of nature and each of their ideal governments

1843 words - 7 pages up their rights, they are subjecting themselves to inequality. Rousseau says if people don't give up their rights, then they can never leave the state of nature.Thomas Hobbes originated the concept of the social contract. Hobbes believed that all the phenomena in the universe, including political institutions, could be understood using principles of geometry. In Leviathan, Hobbes argued that all humans are driven by two impulses: fear of death and

Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Political Powers

990 words - 4 pages The proper use and limits of governmental power have different implications for each theorist that we have studied. Some see its power as all-encompassing, while others see it as more narrow, controlled and regulated. For this essay, I chose to examine the philosophies of the theorists with whom I disagree with the least: Rousseau, Locke, and Rawls. One can always recall Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s famous line: “Man is born free, and everywhere he

Hobbes vs. Rousseau

1430 words - 6 pages The philosophies of Jean Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes represent two opposing views about the moral nature of human beings. The goal of each philosopher was to describe human beings in the "state of nature," or rather, they attempted to strip human beings of all the attributes they took to be the results of civil conventions or customs. By achieving this, the philosophers hoped to uncover certain characteristics about human nature that are

The Life and Philosophies of Jean-Jacques Rousseau

841 words - 3 pages Jean-Jacques Rousseau was an influential French philosopher of the Age of Enlightenment. Rousseau was born on the eighteenth of June 1712 and died in 1778. During his lifetime, this philosopher brought about many new thoughts and ideas that help create the societies of most countries today. Some of his ideas helped contributed to concepts such as civilization being responsible for corrupting humanity's nature, child development, possibilities of

The Natural Ways of Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau

1382 words - 6 pages In today’s society, human nature is a commonly used term. On the other hand, there is not just one concept of human nature, but rather a plethora of concepts surrounding the idea. With the rise of capitalism, social structure is reformed; it is during this rise in the early seventeenth and eighteenth century, that John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau introduce their varying opinions surrounding man in nature. The western

Similar Essays

Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau Essay

2212 words - 9 pages Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau have very different views on the social contract largely based on their fundamental views of the state of nature in humanity. These basic views of natural human nature cause Hobbes and Rousseau to have views on opposite sides of the spectrum, based on two controversial speculations, that human is inherently good or that human is inherently inclined towards egotism and perpetual insecurity. Due to his

Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau Essay

2132 words - 9 pages Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes and Rousseau, both became two of the most influential political theorists in the world. Their ideas and philosophies spread all over the world influencing the creation of

Comparison Of Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau

1269 words - 5 pages understanding man and the tendencies of human beings. The philosophical writings of Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau provoked the discussion of legal and moral philosophy. Assumptions made by both men provide distinct differences on government powers, human morale, and the social contract theories. After examination of the philosophers’ theories on virtue of man and government legitimacy the practice of raising an infant would be a vastly different

Comparison Of Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau

1147 words - 5 pages words great, small, strong weak…” (162). Rousseau is basically saying that humans began to split up the labor between family members and eventually split the work up of the whole group. This then lead to some jobs being looked at as more honorable or important than others. From this people began to develop social classes and that eventually leads to oppression and inequality. When you look at Hobbes’ idea of human nature he says that humans