This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Personal Identity By Derek Parfit Essay

2287 words - 10 pages

In his 1971 paper “Personal Identity”, Derek Parfit posits that it is possible and indeed desirable to free important questions from presuppositions about personal identity without losing all that matters. In working out how to do so, Parfit comes to the conclusion that “the question about identity has no importance” (Parfit, 1971, p. 4.2:3). In this essay, I will attempt to show that Parfit’s thesis is a valid one, with positive implications for human behaviour. The first section of the essay will examine the thesis in further detail and the second will assess how Parfit’s claims fare in the face of criticism.

I
Problems of personal identity generally involve questions about what makes ...view middle of the document...

4.2:2).

Option 2 seems equally as unlikely. How do we decide if A lives on as B or C when each half of A’s brain is exactly similar? Both B and C have equally good reasons for claiming to survive as A so there is no non-arbitrary way to make a distinction between them.

Option 3 now appears to be the most plausible, but only, argues Parfit, if we give up the language of identity. If we do not, A is identical with both B and C. This means that B and C are also identical with each other, which violates the Transitivity Requirement. However, if we abandon the language of identity altogether, we can claim that A survives as B and C without claiming that A is B and C. A’s important psychological connections have been maintained in both B and C, without A being identical to B and C. It is important that we do not confuse survival with identity.

Parfit uses this division case to show that “everything that matters in ordinary survival (or nearly everything), therefore, is preserved in fission, despite the fact that the identity relation is not” (Shoemaker, 2014). What matters in survival need not be one-one.

Fusion
Furthermore, Parfit uses the concept of fusion to show us that what does matter in survival can be a matter of degree. When A fuses together with B, only some (not all) of A’s characteristics and desires survive. This is also the case with B. We cannot say that A and B have failed to survive, nor can we say that each has survived completely intact. Unlike identity, what matters in survival is not all-or-nothing.

Q-Memory and Psychological Connectedness
Parfit has now shown us that what matters in survival need not be all-or-nothing or one-one. Identity is both all-or-nothing and one-one. Therefore, what matters in survival cannot be identity.
Parfit concedes that because identity is a one-one relation, there is indeed ground for speaking of identity where the relation of psychological continuity is also one-one. But where psychological continuity takes a “one-many or branching form” (Parfit, 1971, p. 4.2:7), we should abandon the language of identity. Therefore, for cases in which we are unable to speak of identity (because the psychological continuity relation is not one-one), psychological continuity will be just as important as identity.

The problem with psychological continuity, however, is that many of the relations involved (including memory relations) appear to presuppose identity. Parfit attempts to avoid this charge of circularity by using the concept of q-memory. Q-memories do not presume that the person having the q-memory and the person who actually had the experience are the same person, unlike ordinary memories which do presuppose identity. Parfit applies this same redesription to other relations of psychological continuity such as intention and responsibility.

Parfit returns to the idea of the importance of the psychological continuity relation in survival to introduce an even more important relation- psychological...

Find Another Essay On Personal Identity by Derek Parfit

Is Personal Identity in the Mind of the Beholder?

918 words - 4 pages Personal identity is a very controversial aspect of life. Who are we? What defines us? According to John Locke, psychological continuity is what defines our personal identity. Locke discusses the case of the prince and the cobbler to help shape his theory. However, I absolutely disagree with Locke’s theory. Locke’s theory of personal identity creates many problems, such as the duplication problem. By reformulating Locke’s theory of

cant we all just get along?

1829 words - 8 pages Prejudice, a preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or personal experience. The amount of prejudice differs from person to person, but no one is free from it. In the film, American History X, Derek is a great example of how prejudice someone can be. Derek agrees with the white power movement because he feels victimized and threatened by everyone who is not white, but in prison he learns his stereotypes are full of holes; from the

The Repugnant Conclusion

942 words - 4 pages The Repugnant Conclusion, developed by Derek Parfit, is a theory that tackles population ethics and is based on this statement: "For any possible population of at least ten billion people, all with a very high quality of life, there must be some much larger imaginable population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better even though its members have lives that are barely worth living". Parfit comes to this conclusion with the

Objections to the Repugnant Conclusion: David Parfit

1657 words - 7 pages Objections to the “Repugnant Conclusion” Using seemingly sound steps of logic, David Parfit has come to the “Repugnant Conclusion” that a world of very many people with very good lives is worse than a world of vastly more people with lives that are barely worth living. I shall outline his argument and conclusion, and then explain how we may evade such a counter-intuitive notion by reconsidering the way we measure and compare people’s wellbeing

Human Responsibilities in Domestic Breeding

1815 words - 7 pages around the idea that which specific future people will exist is determined by when procreation takes place and that particular person cannot exist in any other way (21). Derek Parfit argues that if bringing a being into existence cannot harm them, in the morally relevant sense, if they (a) have lives worth living and (b) would not have existed had the choice not been made. Basically, the NIP says that in some cases what is ‘bad’ may not be ‘bad

Legacy of Derek Walcott and his Works

3637 words - 15 pages A Nobel Award Winner and a popular West Indian literary writer, Derek Walcott was much known for his superb works on drama and poetry. Often times, his themes transgress the traditional boundaries that had been separating races, places and languages all over the world. Derek Walcott intended on exploring cross-cultural ethnicity, politics, power and places' history. A City’s Death by Fire and A Far Cry from Africa are two samples of many poem

Psychological Concepts in American History X

980 words - 4 pages attitudes or beliefs about members of other social groups. There are two forms of group antagonism, the “in-group” which is the group in which we belong and forms part of our social identity and the “out-group” which is any group that we do not share membership or we cannot identify with. After being in prison, Derek realizes that just because an African American murdered his father doesn’t mean he should generalize it to all African American men

American History

1478 words - 6 pages the words of Adolph Hitler, giving them something to believe in; the power and superiority of the white race. The hate he has for people who are different grows inside the teens of the gang. The ultimate manifestation of his brainwashing is the murder of two black men by Derek. Yet Derek's downfall and racist notions were not all caused by Cameron's propaganda, but the influences of his father. It isn't until the near end of American History X

Conscientiousness in Derek Jeter

1126 words - 5 pages Conscientiousness in Derek Jeter Personality Analysis Hannah Hargrove University of Miami Author Note This paper was prepared for Personality Psychology 260, taught by Dr, Kaplan. Derek Jeter, one of the most respected and admired players and leaders in baseball, is driven by the personality trait conscientiousness. Conscientiousness is defined as “ a character in which the individual values and obeys

Grey´s Antonmy Script Season Nine

2253 words - 10 pages involving his family in their personal drama; however, Meredith knew that Derek still talked to his mother on a regular basis. It was his sisters who he shut out. Derek’s mother had been the one to tell him Meredith was the one for him. She’d even given him her ring to give to Meredith; the ring that Meredith never even wore. Meredith swallowed, thinking of how Mrs. Shepherd would realize what a horrible mistake she made if Derek did in fact tell

“My Name is Nobody”: Postmodernism in Derek Walcott’s “The Schooner Flight”

1728 words - 7 pages within dynamic cultures like that of the Caribbean. Using postmodernist deconstruction, Walcott aims to diffuse preconceived concepts of what forms identity by providing a personal account of life within a cultural estuary. As a postmodern work, “The Schooner Flight” does not merely exist as a piece of literature; it exists as an exposition of an individualized narrative eager to deconstruct globalized standards. Derek Walcott uses the postmodern

Similar Essays

How Personal Identity Influences The Events We Choose To Attend: Carnival And Carnivalesque By Mikhail Bakhtin

1336 words - 6 pages we have internalised the external environment and how this ultimately affects our behaviours. Goulding and Saren’s publication of: Performing identity: an analysis of gender expressions at the Whitby Goth festival has equally given a clear critique of the nature of gender identities within a specific subculture, a subculture firmly rooted in objects of consumption and bonded together by a common fascination with the vampire. Globalisation is now

Understanding And Accepting Parfit's Nature Of Persisting Persons

2043 words - 8 pages attempted to outline a few of the aspects of Derek Parfit’s view on the nature of persisting persons. Parfit concludes his study of personal identity by briefly arguing against some of our large worries and concerns in facing eminent death and reflection of our short life. He states, “ Egoism, the fear not of near but of distant death, the regret that so much of one’s only life should have gone by—these are not, I think, wholly natural or

Parfit, The Reductionist View, And Moral Commitment

3462 words - 14 pages Parfit, the Reductionist View, and Moral Commitment ABSTRACT: In Reasons and Persons, Derek Parfit argues for a Reductionist View of personal identity. According to a Reductionist, persons are nothing over and above the existence of certain mental and/or physical states and their various relations. Given this, Parfit believes that facts about personal identity just consist in more particular facts concerning psychological continuity and/or

If You Know You Have Alzheimer's, How Do You Regard The Person Who Will Inherit Your Body? Is That Person You? How Is This Case Connected With Philosophical Theories Of Personal Identity?

769 words - 3 pages character traits, but rather, it is the fact that there is bodily continuity between me without Alzheimer's and me without any of my memories. The case of whether one holds this view or holds a different view is very closely connected with the various philosophical theories of personal identity. These theories are namely the psychological continuity view held by Parfit, the bodily continuity view, and the view that a persisting person is marked out