Philippa Foot On Remainders Essay

1025 words - 5 pages

The problem of dilemma, as presented by Philippa Foot in her writing, “Moral Dilemmas Revisited”, is the problem of whether it is possible to be in a situation where you cannot avoid making a wrong choice. Foot argues that it is always possible to avoid making a wrong choice in a difficult situation. She presents the ideas of multiple philosophers and their defense of the thought that there are situations where you can and will make a wrong choice. Foot defends herself further in the explanation of her point. She is presented with many views that involve a person still feeling guilty after a decision has been made. In this paper I will show and defend Foots argument that it is always possible to avoid making a wrong choice in a difficult situation because feelings of guilt do not have to coincide with actual regret or symbolizing a bad decision.
To better understand Foots stance on regret, one must first understand the problem of dilemma in itself. A situation that was exemplified in her paper stated a story in which you have promised a friend you would meet them, but instead have to drive someone to the hospital causing you to break your promise. The idea here is that you are forced with the decision to break a promise you made to a friend, or to leave someone who needs a ride to the hospital to fend for themselves. Foot believes that, ‘obviously he or she ought, all things considered, to do the driving rather than the meeting.’ (Foot 3). This is an obvious response for Foot, because she believes that there is always a right choice in a situation, and that you should not feel guilt, sadness or regret about making your choice so long as you made the right one. Foot mentions multiple philosophical writers who agree that it is possible to make a wrong decision, thus leading to a negative emotion regarding the choice, including regret, guilt, or sadness. Foot refers to these emotions as ‘Remainders’, because they are the remaining emotions left after making a decision.
Ruth Marcus’ view that ‘it is possible to be in circumstances in which one will be guilty whatever one does.’ (Foot 1), Foot believes this means that ‘the feelings of guilt that people often have when they have had to made a difficult moral choice imply that they are guilty.’(Foot 1) This is much like the argument posed by Bernard Williams that feelings of guilt should be taken seriously, and that there are situations where you it is inevitable that you will make a bad choice. (Foot 2). Foot’s belief about remainders is presented in a case of a moral dilemma, which was the dilemma presented above, in which one choice is clearly a better option, while there is rationale behind either choice. Williams presented the idea of moral regret in relation to moral dilemma, where he believes that a person who ‘makes a difficult choice may regret, or feel guilt about, not having chosen differently, even if she...

Find Another Essay On philippa foot on remainders

The Jungle Essay

777 words - 3 pages . Jurgis becomes hardened by his negative experiences as he realizes that, in a capitalist society like the one he was living in, there is no justice. Hard work is not justly rewarded, and often times corruption is rewarded in its place. Through and through, he sees that capitalist life is not fair. Soon he is injured on the job and is forced to stay home and out of work while his mangled foot heals. Jurgis is sidelined from work for two months

Froissart: Reporter of the Middle Ages

1354 words - 5 pages 1337 and, although his family was not noble, it was believed that Froissart's family had ties to the court of the Count of Hainault (Wages 169-170). Froissart received a clerical education and then entered the service of Margaret of Hainault sometime between 1350-1356 (Frail 760-765). After her death he went on to serve as secretary to the daughter of the Count of Hainault, Queen Philippa. This is important because it shows that even though

Is it Irrational to Act Immorally?

1672 words - 7 pages . Essentially, both internalist and externalist responses to this question are problematic for very different reasons. An internalist response may be defended so long as we maintain that there is an important distinction to be made between what is rational and what is correct within society. That is, rational actions may be deemed logical, but nevertheless be judged as condemnable. Works Cited Foot, Philippa (1975) “Morality as a System of

Ancient History: Preserved Human Remains - Study of Oetzi the Iceman and Lindow Man

1412 words - 6 pages that would transport them to a shredding mill, when he looked at one block of peat and noticed what he thought was a piece of wood embedded in it. He jokingly threw it at Eddie, when it missed him it hit the ground and crumbled, revealing a human foot. Andrew quickly reported his find to the police. When the police arrived they soon located the area of the bog where the foot had been dug up. On the surface of the peat, was a flap of darkened

Tom's Midnight Garden by Philippa Pearce

2515 words - 10 pages This essay is about Tom’s Midnight Garden a book written by Philippa Pearce. The story is about a lonely boy’s adventure in an enchanted garden, who finds a new playmate in Hattie and who shares in the adventure with him. It is also about “Tom’s development of the conscious state in childhood as he becomes aware of complex emphatic feelings and more diverse states of mind which comes about through his desperate need for freedom.” (Natov: 2009

When Things Fall Apart, Should We Fall to Pieces:

1854 words - 7 pages conviction that there is a better life, a better world, beyond the horizon - Franklin D. Roosevelt. Works Cited Achebe, Chinua. Things Fall Apart, Part One. 2nd. 2nd. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2009. 1102. Print. Gyekye, Kwame. An Essay on African Philosophical Thought: The Akan Conceptual Scheme. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987. Foot, Philippa. Virtues and Vices. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1978

Consequentialism: Principia Ethics by G.E. Moore

1937 words - 8 pages any situation. By using the principles of consequentialism the guess work of deciding what to do in a dilemma can easily be solved by doing what creates the best overall result. Works Cited Aquinas, Thomas Summa Theologica. Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Sacred-, n.d. Web. 07 July 2013. . Foot, Philippa. Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy

Permitting Abortion and Prohibiting Prenatal Harm

4016 words - 16 pages (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1995), pp.123-127; Thomas D. Sullivan, "Active and Passive Euthanasia: An Impertinent Distinction?," in Social and Personal Ethics, edited by William H. Shaw (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1996), pp.107-111; Philippa Foot, "Euthanasia," in Moral Issues, edited by Jan Narveson (Toronto: Oxford, 1983), pp. 7-28; Joel Feinberg, Harm to Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984) and others for such a discussion. (2) I'll use the term

Reality and Illusion in Shakespeare's Hamlet - Reality, Appearance and Deception

896 words - 4 pages might play." (I.2 ln 84) By acknowledging Hamlet's comprehension of the separation between appearances and truth, Shakespeare gives the audience a reasonable belief in Hamlet's eventual success despite the obstacles he creates for himself.   Developing a convincing scheme by which to determine the goodness of the ghost and to achieve revenge is Hamlet's first action. Hamlet asks his friend Horatio to refrain from commenting on any strange

Sub-plots in Hamlet

1118 words - 4 pages . After all of the heirs to the Denmark throne have been killed, Fortinbras comes to Denmark from a victorious conquer of Poland. In his dying breath Hamlet said, "But I do prophesy th’election lights On Fortinbras. He has my dying voice" (308). Because much of the Denmark land once was Fortinbras’ inheritance, Fortinbras was enable to claim the kingdom. This ending is needed to make the play a true tragedy. According to Aristotle, a tragedy is a "a

Hamlet as Victim and Hero

1301 words - 5 pages : nevertheless not as I will, but as thou will" (The Holy Bible 1235). Hamlet realized, as Jesus did, that he was in a situation where he was the only man to do the job. Therefore, he forgot about his own death and suicidal thoughts and concentrated more on bringing his uncle to justice.   Throughout the play, Hamlet demonstrates a witty personality although he is bogged down by the knowledge of his father's murder. Ophelia noticed his

Similar Essays

The Trolley Problem And The Morality Of Killing

1340 words - 5 pages Essay topicThe Trolley Problem and the Morality of KillingIntroductionThe Trolley problem, first introduced by Philippa Foot, is one thought-experiment that creates a moral dilemma in many. Such moral dilemmas arise from conflicting moral principles - while one principle says we should save as many lives as we can, another tells us it is wrong to kill an innocent person, even for a good cause. Herein, we face a moral quandary. In order to

Responses To The Challenge Of Amoralism

3550 words - 14 pages considerations" interchangeably. But Alf also knows, perhaps from reading Philippa Foot, that "to say that moral considerations are called reasons is blatantly to ignore the problem." The problem, as Alf sees it, is that he differs from other people. He has no goals or desires, or anything else, through which moral considerations clearly can gain a rational purchase on his behavior. For him, moral considerations are not obviously reasons to act

Alice Walker’s Short Story Everyday Use

904 words - 4 pages in the eye, talking to them only “with one foot raised in flight,” (103) Dee however, “would always look anyone in the eye. Hesitation was no part of her nature” (103).She goes on to say Dee is self-centered and demanding but also remembers this daughter as a determined fighter. Dee is concerned with style, but she will do whatever is necessary to improve her circumstance. For instance, when Dee wanted a new dress, she had to “make over” a green

Shafer Landau And Korsgaard Essay

1616 words - 7 pages opens up the possibility of wrong turns or moral mistakes that are often made. The idea of “bad things done with the best intentions” can be excused here. To Shafer-Landau one must either support moral rationalism or submit to the idea that the moral evaluation of an agent has no relation to their reasons or rationality (Shafer-Landau, 2007) On the opposing side of the argument it Foot and his idea of morality being based in hypothetical imperatives