Philosopher Robert Nozick believes in the entitlement theory. The entitlement theory states that, “A person who acquires a holding in accordance with the principle of justice in acquisition is entitled to that holding...A person who acquires a holding in accordance with the principle of justice in transfer, from someone else entitled to the holding, is entitled to the holding…No one is entitled to a holding except by (repeated) applications of 1 and 2” (NOTES).
Health care should not be provided for all US citizens. While this may be convenient for some, it would be very inconvenient for many. Providing health care for all US citizens isn’t very realistic, and would have more negative results than positive results.
Nozick believes that the state should not have the power to establish public education or health care through taxes imposed on citizens who may wish to spend their money on private services instead.
However, Philosopher John Rawls believes opposite of Nozick. Rawls believes that in addition to protecting the basic liberties, it is legitimate for the state to use its coercive powers to maximize the position of the least well off (via redistributive taxes).
Philosopher John Rawls is wrong in his belief. This can be proven by the many problems that may arise if all US citizens were given health care. There are many problems that would be possible if all citizens were given health care. For example, if health care were provided for all US citizens, a lot more people would be going into the doctor for anything, no matter how small or insignificant. More people going to the doctor means more doctors needing to be available which in turn results in more doctors needing to be hired, which ultimately results in more money needed. People that have free health care are more likely to go to the doctor, whereas people that don’t have health insurance won’t. So if health care is provided to everyone more people are likely to go to the doctor for insignificant things. Therefore, if healthcare was not provided for all US citizens, as it shouldn’t be, then, less doctors’ visits would be occurring, less doctors would be needed and less money would ultimately be needed.
Another problem that would arise is the fact that people that can afford health care are going to be the ones being charged the most. So it’s basically like they’re paying for everyone’s health care, including their own, which is unfair. People that may be able to afford health care, but choose not to, would not be charged as much and would...