This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Philosophy: Sophist, Syllogism And Propositions Essay

1007 words - 5 pages

Aristotle starts by saying we suppose ourselves to possess knowledge of a thing, rather than accidentally knowing it (sophist). He asserts that we know all events by demonstration: by a syllogism that is a product of scientific knowledge. Assuming this is true, the premises must be true because we can’t know what doesn’t exist, they must be primary or basic truths which is an immediate proposition, they must be indemonstrable because you need a demonstration to know something demonstrable, they must cause the conclusion, and they must be better known and prior to the conclusion. If a syllogism is without these things, it is no demonstration.
Objects nearer to sense are prior and better ...view middle of the document...

All questions are a search for a middle. Aristotle observes that in many cases the nature of the thing and the reason of the fact are identical. He then develops the idea that not everything demonstrable can be defined, and not everything definable can be demonstrated. Definition reveals nature while demonstration reveals the attachment of an attribute

Part 3
Next Aristotle considers causes.
Men don’t know until they understand ‘why’ (the primary cause). There are four senses of cause: that out of which a thing comes to be, the form of the archetype, the primary source of change, the reason something is done.
Since there are many senses of cause, a thing has many causes. Some things cause each other (in different senses of cause) and one thing can cause contrary things.
There are many modes of causation: there are proper and genus and incidental causes, which are complex or by itself and then all can be spoken as potential or actual. In total there are six various uses. Causes that are actual and particular exist and stop existing simultaneously with their effect. This isn’t always true for potential causes.
To investigate a cause of a thing, seek what’s most precise and the last cause is then the prior.

Part 4
The number of causes is the number of things under the question why
Why is referred to: in things that don’t involve motion, what initiated the motion, for the sake of what, the case of things coming into being
There are three branches of study: things incapable of motion, things in motion but indestructible, and destructible things. ‘Why’ is answered by referencing matter, its form, and the primary moving cause.
There are two principles hat cause motion in a physical way, the completely unchangeable and the form

Plato’s view on the nature of science centers on his theory of the Forms. Plato’s Forms are similar in some ways to Aristotle’s basic truth, they are the...

Find Another Essay On Philosophy: Sophist, Syllogism and Propositions

Influences of socratic philoso Essay

920 words - 4 pages WESTERN CIVILIZATION In today's modern world, much of our own culture's beliefs and morals are directly due to the impact of Socratic philosophy on European thinkers, and therefore our own in the western world. This philosophy, was based upon the thoughts of Socrates, who was an Athenian philosopher and possibly the most enigmatic figure in the entire history of philosophy.To begin, after about 450 B.C., Athens was considered the cultural center

hypoth Essay

2330 words - 9 pages HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISMSHYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISM is an argument whose major premise is made up of a hypothetical proposition and whose minor premise and conclusion are categorical propositions. Hypothetical syllogisms are either CONDITIONAL, DISJUNCTIVE, or CONJUNCTIVE ARGUMENTS.THE CONDITIONAL SYLLOGISMThe major premise of a conditional syllogism is a conditional proposition consisting of an antecedent and a consequent. The antecedent is what

Using Inductive and Deductive Reasoning through Two Distinct Theories of Logic: Bayesian Confirmation Theory and Syllogism

897 words - 4 pages thorough and accurate truths about our world and the situations that occur within it. As the study of logic has evolved over time, so have the theories that are used to arrive at accepted truths. While the human mind natural seeks to make meaning of the world, it is important to note that reasoning can be fallible, even when the premises are widely accepted truths. Utilizing mathematics, philosophy, and many other disciplines, logicians will continue to attempt to discover ways to uncover universal truths. While the Bayesian confirmation theory and syllogism approach arriving at conclusions in very distinct ways, they both have value in revealing these truths.

A Short History of Ethics

1276 words - 5 pages further complements the debate with historic examples to conclude the social success (or lack thereof) and persuasion of both sides. MacIntyre begins by outlining the general amalgam of Sophistic theory: success. The areté (virtue) of a Sophist is to be a successful citizen through conforming to the social convention of justice (14). Employing the dialogue, Theatetus, he reveals Protagoras’ doctrine as being the link between relativism to knowledge

Rhinoceros purpose passage

636 words - 3 pages In this passage, Ionesco creates a parallel conversation between Berenger and his friend Jean, and the Logician and an Old Gentleman in a bar in which the first two are discussing Berenger’s life and the latter are discussion a syllogism. This passage serves to exemplify how logic can be twisted, absurd and inexplicable beyond human rationality. With this passage, Ionesco goes far beyond the literary realm and into the world, commenting on the

Doubting Thomas

692 words - 3 pages phenomena and recognize instead a single non-human deity underlying and unifying all worldly phenomena. 117 A parallel to Xenophanes' philosophy is that which was expressed by Gorgias, a famous Sophist. The Sophists consisted of experienced debaters and speech writers who popularized the ideas of various early philosophers; but based on their understanding of this prior philosophic thought, most of them concluded that truth and morality were

Aristotelian Rhetoric: An Evolution of Sophist’s Discredited Methodology

2089 words - 8 pages Sophists’ long disdained and overlooked techniques. In order to explain my argument, I will briefly review the main tenets of the sophistic rhetoric and why Plato condemned such rhetoric “foul” and “ugly,” but later retracted and stated that there was a “good rhetoric.” Finally, I will justify why the Aristotelian rhetoric can be perceived as a systemized evolution and progression of the sophist rhetoric. Scholars noted that rhetoric as a

The Philosophy of Socrates and the Sophists

600 words - 3 pages calls dialectic. A dialectic approach consists of difficult questions and plausible answers. He will examine if whether or not the answers are plausible. Apart from Nature Philosophy, Socrates questions were never answered that fully satisfied him. He doesn’t consider himself a nature philosopher or a sophist. He is not ashamed of considering himself ignorant. Ironically, according to the Orator, he is the wisest man. The reason why Socrates is

Aristotle

1946 words - 8 pages probably false and certainly exaggerated. Upon the death of Philip, Alexander succeeded to the kingship and prepared for his subsequent conquests. Aristotle's work being finished, he returned to Athens, which he had not visited since the death of Plato. He found the Platonic school flourishing under Xenocrates, and Platonism the dominant philosophy of Athens. He thus set up his own school at a place called the Lyceum. When teaching at the Lyceum

The Father of Logic Aristotilian Logic

558 words - 2 pages the world.(2)The initial book in Aristotle's collected logical works is the Categories. It begins with a distinction among three ways in which the meaning of different uses of a predicate may be related to each other: homonymy, synonymy, and paronymy.Another of Aristotle's logical works, On Interpretation, considers the use of predicates in combination with subjects to form propositions or assertions, each of which is either true or false. We

My Goal of Becoming an Army First Sergeant

676 words - 3 pages that follow, I will attempt to present the reader with enough proof to enable them to conclude I will definitely be promoted to the rank of First Sergeant. In addition, I will reconstruct the full argument and examine the case for validity and soundness. “A chain argument is a type of imperfect hypothetical syllogism since it may contain more than three propositions” (Boss, 2012, p. 248). They are arranged in a way in which one action, or

Similar Essays

Probabilist Deductive Inference In Gassendi's Logic

3492 words - 14 pages empirical claims consists in the warrant from experience for those claims we introduce in their support. In Book IV (On method) of his Institutio Logica, Pierre Gassendi proposes an unusual venue for probable and nondeductive inference in empirical reasoning: demonstrative syllogism. Thus, in 'resolution'—the seeking of a thing's causes given the evidence of its effects—he recognizes the critical role of inferring general claims from the particulars

Difference In The Philosophy Of Plato And Aristotle And Their Influence

1585 words - 7 pages logic and demanded empirical evidence. He developed a method of directing the mind of the individual towards correct reasoning or syllogism; this method is called Aristotle’s Syllogism logic or Theory of Syllogism (Groarke). Syllogism Logic is one of the ways that the natural world can be analyzed after observation to draw a logically conclusion: It is “made up of three categorical propositions, two premises (which set out the evidence), and a

Teaching Argument Evaluation In An Introductory Philosophy Course

3617 words - 14 pages affirmative: (d) S a P (u) Universal negative: (d) S e P (d) [commutative terms] Particular affirmative: (u) S i P (u) [commutative terms] Particular negative: (u) S o P (d) Commutation need not be discussed at all, but it may be introduced as a way to speed the translation of universal negative and particular affirmative propositions. At this point, students should be able to identify all the parts of a syllogism

Meaning And Logic Essay

2307 words - 10 pages , p. 145). 3. Logic as a subfield of philosophy Developed by Aristotle, logic is part of the traditional branches of philosophy and deals with distinguishing correct reasoning – propositions from incorrect. However, while logic deals with propositions, utterances are not to be dealt with, seeing how they are instances of behaviour. (Hurford, Heasley, Smith, p. 142). The recent development of logic has shaped a couple of scientific studies