For many years physician-assisted suicide has been a debated issue. Is it morally, medically, or ethically correct? An opinion of this issue is based solely on you morals and viewpoints. Should patients have a right to die? Should doctors have a right to kill? And should states be allowed to legalize physician-assisted suicide?
In the US only four states have legalized physician-assisted suicide. The states that have done so have rules and regulations to go by before the deed can be done. November 8th, 1994 is when the first US state passed to legalize physician-assisted suicide (ProCon). Oregon was the first of the four who, in the United States, has passed the law. Vermont and Washington followed this, but one main state is Montana (ProCon). All other three states have quite a few of rules and strict protocol to go by. Montana on the other hand does not. The only “legal” rule they have is that the patient must be a resident of the state (ProCon). There is no minimum age, how long expected till death, or even how many numerous times they asked. They can, more than likely, make up situations to act upon. The carelessness of states in this country is what effects the country as a whole. Making decisions about someone’s life is inevitably irreversible. So, when states take on a big responsibility to fight for human rights or to disagree with the murderous act then this poses a problem for the country all together.
Physician-assisted suicide has happened many time inside as well as outside the US. This has also be legalized. Could this happen in the US to? That is one things that people fear the most about the whole situation is it happening in their own states, towns, and even homes. 1990 to 1995 are five years to remember when thinking of this issue (American Medical Association). Two studies done in Holland have been the best sources, by far, about the wrong desires of physician-assisted suicide. One fourth of the people killed in Holland in those five years was without their consent. Why would a person, nevertheless, a doctor wish to do this to someone they have right to take care of. Webster dictionary clearly states that a doctor is one who is to take care of and treat a patient. A patient is one who is sickly and is in need of healing. In what way are these definitions anywhere near to the example of what happened in Holland? They did this deed with no fear of getting punished or charged with murder. This situation is different than those of many others. This happened WITHOUT consent of a patient. The question remaining for many is what was is the motive to do such an act? Having been treating the patient for illness unknown, maybe, to anyone else they killed them.
The main issue with the act in Holland is this…could that happen in the US? The scary truth is that it is getting closer by the day. The more states carelessly pass laws about a human’s life, the more it is going to spread to not be a big deal. To most people, human lives are...