Plato’s Function Argument Essay

1986 words - 8 pages

In Plato's argument I feel that it was a good argument, but you really could not, come to a final answer without coming to some middle ground. I truly believe that many people would choose to stay in a world where there's any justice, but we will all know that this world could not exist without justice prevailing. Having justice as an issue will be the solution. We all know that living in a world where there is in- justice will be a very disturbed world, because people will be doing evil to each other without consequences. There fore retaliation will be an issue. We will not know how to co-exist among each other. That is why the officials who are selected or trained to show leadership and rule, should know what justice is and how to apply it fairly. Because if we try to dilute ourselves into thinking that we as people could live in this world, where there are any consequences, we can do anything we choose. That notion alone only corrupts the mind and could do the same to the world. Justice has to be over all. Then we would be organized, and the world could run smoothly. Not saying that there won't be some injustice that people would to do each other. But with justice standing tall. The people who do injustice to someone would know that there's consequences to receive for there action. In a world that injustice rules would be chaotic. There will be so much evil taking place. That it would practically be unbearable. The world we live in today has justice. And it stills have it evil that's done. Could we all imagine living in a world where there's injustice that rules and know one cares. That would be a horrible place to live. And for that reason alone we will still have to come to some middle ground. Because you can't live in a perfect world without it combining with an injustice world. Justice is a valuable asset. We all need it to prevail. And more importantly to know what justice is, so that it will in able us to apply it correctly. When we have fair and good values, we can allow ourselves to live well, because justice is a good virtue. I strongly believe that Plato argument was a good argument because every good person would want to live in a justice world, but I also believe that a world ruled by justice is good, but you also have some injustice in it. But in the justice world consequences are dealt with fairly. Where as in an injustice world no one would care. If no one knows what justice is or if it is not applied. How would a just soul allow a human being to live well? In this specific question, we must know what justice is and be grounded by it. What Plato is saying is that if we live a just life than our soul will live well. That question stills points at knowing what justice is will influence the outcome of the way we live. If we know what it stands for, then we could apply it. I have no problems with Plato's argument; I sincerely think that a justice world is best. And even though there would be people who would choose to live in an...

Find Another Essay On Plato’s Function Argument

Art and Mimesis on the Individual

1959 words - 8 pages Plato’s assault on mimesis occur in a couple of different sections of the Republic. Initially the most divulging explanation occurs in Books II and III. Book I develops the discourse, along with Book II, where Plato’s controversial argument begins. His fundamental concept is individual’s need a good life. As opposed to the perspective of Thrasymachus, Plato believes that the good life is not an egoistic, a moral appreciation of ability and

Plato vs Aristotle Essay

1823 words - 7 pages the simple reason that the rulers govern by virtue of their reason. Women […] have exactly the same powers of reasoning as men, provided they get the same training and are exempted from child rearing and housekeeping.”(Gaarder 92) Plato took his argument a step farther by saying “that a state that does not educate and train women is like a man who only trains his right arm."(Gaarder 92) Plato’s totalitarian utopia with sexual equality is opposite

Aristophanes’ Clouds a Satyr Play Written in 419 BCE

1337 words - 5 pages be read as a warning to Socrates. Aristophanes is a “friendly critic” of Socrates and warns Socrates to change his ways for Athens and for the good of himself (Whidden). Plato’s Symposium and especially his Apology of Socrates does not discount the claims made in Clouds about the dangers of philosophy and Socrates to the public, even if Plato’s Socrates is less exaggeratedly flawed than the Socrates in Clouds. In Apology, Socrates takes

Aristotelian Rhetoric: An Evolution of Sophist’s Discredited Methodology

2089 words - 8 pages truth, and its potential for shaping the society”(Herrick, 2009, p. 73). However, many scholars wrote that Plato was not “fair to rhetoric and the Sophists” in his dialogue, Gorgias, where he represented the Sophist as an unrecognizable figure, and portrayed the Sophists in general as “worse offenders against justice than they actually were” More importantly, Plato’s dialogue “should be viewed as rhetorical argument of the kind associated with

Gorgias: The Father of Sophistry

1739 words - 7 pages , sophistry is, “a movement of philosophy that emphasizes the real-world use of rhetoric concerning civic and political life” (Higgins). The sophists were nomadic paid educators who instructed on oratory and rhetoric. Many people claimed that sophists had the ability to teach the thesis and antithesis of any subject or idea. “Another quality of the sophist’s teaching was their ability to make the weaker argument the stronger” (Higgins). Gorgias is

The Platonic and Aristotelian Views on the Role and Status of Women in Society

3397 words - 14 pages same training and education as men, but his argument for equality emanates through the idea of male superiority. Plato contends in this section that women are inferior to men in every aspect, including intelligence. Yet, Plato cannot argue that all women are inferior to all men, or else dividing women into three different classes would make little sense. Plato’s class structure is of importance here. He argues that within every class women are


1595 words - 7 pages dedicate deliberate and conscious thought to the problem, a superior method may appear. The “good life” can range from a system of ethics to a quality of existence in comparison to others. Many philosophers, writers, and religious figures have speculated on what “the good life” truly is. Among these figures are the philosopher Plato and St. Paul. Plato’s best individual life is one of method and technique. The more established opinion of the good

The Cosmological and Teleological Arguments

1760 words - 7 pages philosophy, the cosmological argument can be traced all the way back to Plato’s Laws. However, its first appearance as a fully formed argument appears in the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas. St. Thomas Aquinas was a Roman Catholic philosopher who lived in the thirteenth century, and had a phenomenal effect on Western philosophy. In his writings, he came to what he believed to be a basic proof for the existence of God. In summary, the argument

Relevance of Sexual Relations in Old Babylonia, Nomadic Hebrews, and Greece

1383 words - 6 pages Ancient societies codified their regulations on sex, in both formal laws and in social practices. Hammurabi, ruler of Old Babylonia, gave his people a law code in c.1700 BCE; the Mosaic Law code for the ancient Hebrews followed in c.1200 BCE. Though the ancient Greek philosopher Plato’s The Symposium (c.385 BCE) does not put forth legal restrictions on sex, its dialogue does attempt to define love. These documents illustrate how each

Present and Discuss the Views submitted by Socrates and Thrasymachius in the First Book of Platos Republic

2201 words - 9 pages function optimally. Therefore, the just mind and just man will have a good, happy and prosperous life, while the unjust man will have a miserable life. In order to explicate the claims of Socrates and Thrasymachus examples of craftsmanship have been employed. It is possible to argue that both sides to this argument rely heavily on the parallel between the relationship a craftsman has with his subject to justify their positions. However, I do

Socrates and Plato in Phaedo

1185 words - 5 pages Socrates a classical Greek philosopher and character of Plato’s book Phaedo, defines a philosopher as one who has the greatest desire of acquiring knowledge and does not fear death or the separation of the body from the soul but should welcome it. Even in his last days Socrates was in pursuit of knowledge, he presents theories to strengthen his argument that the soul is immortal. His attempts to argue his point can’t necessarily be considered

Similar Essays

Plato On Justice Essay

981 words - 4 pages easily make the argument that since philosophy is dealing with the same questions for the past 2500 years, that we are actually not wise, and in fact quite the opposite. I believe that for the most part, Plato has a successful account of justice. Plato’s criticism of then present theories of justice and his defense against the xxxxxx theories make sense logically. Furthermore, Plato was ages ahead of his time by arguing for equal rights among men and

Apology For Poetry Essay

1885 words - 8 pages . His advocacy on poetry is primarily constituted on the theories of Aristotle’s poetics, as well as the acceptance on Plato’s poetic contribution. The function and form of poetry according to the theories of Platonism is defended and reconciled by Sidney. Further words and sanctions from Aristotle provide ammunition in support of the defense. Plato’s considerable concern had been with the education of men achieving moral excellence; however

Aristotle Vs. Plato Essay

1397 words - 6 pages Aristotle vs. Plato Excellence is a function which renders excellent the thing of which it is a function is Plato’s definition of virtue. What does this definition really mean though? Plato and Aristotle both had their own unique arguments devoted to the topic at hand, and their own ways of describing what virtue really is. Defining virtue may seem to be an easy taste, but to truly understand the arguments behind the definition can prove to

Glaucon's Challenge And Plato's Theory Of Justice In Plato's Republic

1939 words - 8 pages injustice is never more profitable to a person than justice and Thrasymachus withdraws from the argument, granting Plato’s response. Glaucon, however, is not satisfied and proposes a challenge to Plato to prove that justice is intrinsically valuable and that living a just life is always superior. This paper will explain Glaucon’s challenge to Plato regarding the value of justice, followed by Plato’s response in which he argues that his theory of