Plato's "Trial And Death Of Socrates", Explains Socrates View Of Self Examination (Meditation) As The Path To Knowledge.

897 words - 4 pages

Knowledge as Self-ExaminationSocrates had an important point to make when he said," I do not think I know what I do not know." This was the reason why Socrates believed himself wiser than the wise men of Athens. This was the only reason Socrates was wiser than the other men considered wise in Athens. Socrates knew he didn't know something if he had no knowledge of it; where as, the men considered wise thought that they knew something when in fact they did not know it. This gave Socrates an important advantage over the other men in Athens. How can someone know the truth and gain mass amounts of knowledge if that person doesn't know and have great knowledge of his or herself.Socrates analyzed everything including his own knowledge and actions. Socrates realized that wisdom can be obtained by self-examination and by speaking the philosophical language. He spoke the philosophical language and understood the questioning process as his own understanding of life. That is why the people of Athens sometimes misunderstood the message of what Socrates was speaking about. Most of the Athenians didn't understand the philosophical language or Socrates' way of thinking and analyzing, thus lacked the ability to gain philosophic knowledge.Meletus, for example, did not understand the philosophic language and probably had never spent hours of self-examination. Meletus didn't understand what Socrates was saying, and he greatly misunderstood how Socrates cared for the community. On the other hand, Socrates did truly care for the community, but Meletus did not understand the philosophic language or Socrates style of thinking. This caused Meletus to have a disliking for Socrates and caused Meletus to cause the death of Socrates. Meletus showed he really did not care for the good of the community. Yet, to gain notoriety in society Meletus prosecuted Socrates to get rid of someone he disliked and to give cause to the community to speak of how much Meletus cares for good things. Meletus thinks he knows what he does not know, yet he acts the opposite of what he preaches. This is shown by his responses in the court room. The answers that Meletus gave to Socrates' questions were simple, not properly thought out, yet all of the answers he gave were put in the form of bold statements. For example, a few of Meletus' strong answers are: "That is most definitely what I mean," "This is what I say, that you do not believe in gods at all," and some of the more simple answers are: "Certainly" "Of course" "Of course not" "All of them." Each answer is not properly thought out before spoken, therefore proving that Meletus thinks he knows...

Find Another Essay On Plato's "trial and death of socrates", Explains socrates view of self-examination (meditation) as the path to knowledge.

The Trial of Socrates Essay

983 words - 4 pages was made up of 501 Athenian citizens of all classes of society. While he fails to convince the Athenian jury of his innocence, he does a wonderful job in this effort. I personally believe that Socrates is innocent, and that the Athenian jury made the wrong decision. Socrates was accused of being a sophist, a professional philosopher. Sophists were seen as corrupters of society and as generally bad men. Socrates says that every one of

Morality and Laws in The Trial and Death of Socrates

1231 words - 5 pages Morality and Laws in The Trial and Death of Socrates Upon reading Plato, The Trial and Death of Socrates, Socrates strongly held views on the relationship between morality and laws become apparent to the reader. Equally, Socrates makes clear why laws should be followed and why disobedience to the law is rarely justified. Finally, he makes clear his views regarding civil disobedience. Socrates’ view on morality is that anyone can do wrong

Erroneus Assumptions in The Trial and Death of Socrates

2336 words - 9 pages Erroneus Assumptions in The Trial and Death of Socrates In Plato's Crito, Socrates explains to his old friend Crito his reasons for refusing an offer to help him escape execution. One of the tools Socrates uses to convince Crito of the righteousness of his decision is a hypothetical argument concerning the state and laws of Athens. Central to this argument is the congeniality that Socrates had always found in Athens, reflected by the fact

'The Death of Socrates'

702 words - 3 pages silence". Some of the story told in the Phaedo is seen the scene portrayed in David's paintingBoth David's neoclassical painting and Plato's literary work depicts the closing moments of the life of Socrates. This is when he is condemned to death by hemlock by the Athenian government for his teaching methods, which aroused skepticism and impiety in his students. Although David's painting was an illustration of Plato's Phaedo, the scene in the painting was slightly different because was painted through a Roman point of view.

The Death Of Socrates

515 words - 2 pages The Death of Socrates By viewing the painting The Death of Socrates by Jacques-Louis David, Socrates? loyalty to the Athenian government was far more important to him than his own death or friendship. He was more interested in teaching his students about his belief in reason and the law of justice before he died. Still, the students and friends were arguing with him and trying to convince him to renounce his teachings. Socrates was strong in

The Death Of Socrates

556 words - 2 pages The Death of Socrates By viewing the painting The Death of Socrates by Jacques-Louis David, Socrates' loyalty to the Athenian government was far more important to him than his own death or friendship. He was more interested in teaching his students about his belief in reason and the law of justice before he died. Still, the students and friends were arguing with him and trying to convince him to renounce his teachings. Socrates was

Plato's account of Socrates Apology

2091 words - 9 pages Plato's account of Socrates' Apology In Plato's account of Socrates' apology, Socrates is brought to trial on the charges that he corrupted the youth of Athens through his teachings, and that he did not believe in the gods that the state believed in. Throughout the account, the argument against him comes across as unreliable and biased. Therefore, Socrates is innocent of the charges laid against him by Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon due to the

Socrates' Trial

835 words - 3 pages In Plato’s: The Apology Socrates was charged and put on trial for impiety, as well as accused of committing many other crimes. I will first explain the most important issues of why Socrates was sent to death. Then I will argue the position that Socrates is innocent, and should not be have been found guilty. To introduce, Socrates was placed on trial and charged with the crime of impiety. Impiety is the lack of reverence for the gods and

Thrasymachus’ View Of Justice And Socrates’ Re

1103 words - 4 pages labor laws.Additionally, the entire foundation of Socrates claims lies on basic characteristics he attributes to justice such as honesty, excellence, and fairness. However, the underlying assumption of Thrasymachus? argument is that by acting just one is obeying unjust laws enacted by a self-interested ruler. This creates a paradox because society may perceive themselves as honest, excellent, and fair when, however, the opposite is true. The

David's "Death of Socrates" and G

1299 words - 5 pages Jacques-Louis David was a political figure as well as an artist. He was more closely involved in the political life of his time than any other contemporary painter. During the revolution David became a Deputy and voted for the execution of Louis XVI and his work is deeply marked by this fact. In his Death of Socrates David put Neo-classicism at the service of a morality based on Greco-Roman stoicism, self-sacrifice, and stern patriotism. The

Jacques-Louis David's, "The Death of Socrates"

1284 words - 5 pages and teachings that aroused skepticism in his students. Socrates refused to go into exile and took his sentence of death by hemlock. (Crow 26)David lived during the Age of Reason in France, otherwise known as the Enlightenment. It was an age of reason based on faith and a changing world that gave people the opportunity of a new and better life. During this time, however, the Church was the people's only source of knowledge and education, and for

Similar Essays

The Trial And Death Of Socrates

1656 words - 7 pages not sit well with many of the trial members who were evaluating him. Despite the fact that Socrates made frequent references to the fact that it is destined for him to be the wisest of all men, he also recognizes that he does in fact lack in knowledge when it comes to world affairs. To which, Socrates states only adds to his wisdom as he is aware of the fact that he does not know everything and that realization alone makes him wiser than most other

The Trial And Death Of Socrates

1017 words - 4 pages people he had humiliated and embarrassed. He states the entire motivation for this trial as been brought because of the humiliation and dishonor he had brought upon the Athenians. Socrates then interrogates one of his accusers, Meletus a poet, who was the only accuser to speak during his defense. Meletus is the youngest out of the three accusers and Socrates says that the only reason why his is part of the prosecution is because Socrates’ had

The Trial Of Socrates Essay

1918 words - 8 pages thought."The one defense that Stone (and I as the reader) felt would have changed the outcome of the trial required Socrates to give credence to the ideals of the democracy and more importantly to the ideal of free speech. Stone writes "had Socrates invoked freedom of speech as a basic right of all Athenians- not just the privilege of a superior and self-selected few like himself - he would have struck a deep and responsive chord. Socrates would have

The Trial Of Socrates Essay

1100 words - 4 pages hypocrisy. It is this hypocrisy that makes the trial and death of Socrates quite ironic. Athens, the city in which Socrates resided, was a free democratic city that was governed by all citizens in a fair democracy as seen in apology. It was said to be an association of free men with no single leader or king. The town prided itself on the freedom of its citizens and, especially, its freedom of speech. Most all citizens prided themselves on these