This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Plea Bargains And Mandatory Sentencing Essay

560 words - 2 pages

Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing

I would like to take this time to explain my position on Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing. I will show both pros and cons for each topic, as well as give you my personal brief on which one I support.

There are two types of plea bargains : The first one is a charge bargain. When the prosecutor allows a defendant to "plead guilty to a lesser charge”, or to only some of the charges that have been filed against him. For example, a defendant charged with burglary may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to "attempted burglary". A defendant charged with Drunk Driving and Driving with License Suspended may be offered the opportunity to plead guilty to just the drunk driving charge. The second plea bargain is when a defendant is told in advance what his sentence will be if he pleads guilty. This can help a prosecutor obtain a conviction if, for example, a defendant is facing serious charges and is afraid of being hit with the "maximum" sentence. Typically, sentence bargains can only be granted if they are approved by the trial judge. Many jurisdictions severely limit sentence bargaining.

Sentence bargaining sometimes occurs in high profile cases where the prosecutor does not want to reduce the charges against the defendant, usually for fear of how the newspapers will react. A sentence bargain may allow the prosecutor to obtain a conviction to the most serious charge, while assuring the defendant of an acceptable sentence. I agree that we as a society should accept charge bargains to get more information out of a...

Find Another Essay On Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing

Plea Bargaining Essay

977 words - 4 pages people, the defendant cannot predict what ultimately will happen. Plea bargains are also perceived as offering the accused a freedom of choice. From the state's point of view, the main benefit of the plea bargain is that it saves time and money (PBS, 2005). Many acknowledge that the system would collapse if every case that was filed were to be set for trial.From the point of view of the prosecutor or district attorney, plea bargains ensure that the

The Impact of Formalising Plea Bargaining on Justice and Equality in the English Legal System

4139 words - 17 pages Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000, as discussed previously. As a result, Lord Justice Auld was asked by the Lord Chancellor to review the criminal courts in England and Wales.[13] One of the areas he was required to reassess was whether a formal discounting system of early pleas should be introduced and whether or not plea bargaining should be permitted.[14] Lord Justice Auld believed that advance indication

Overcrowding in the united states prison

1858 words - 8 pages Guideline establish mandatory minimums for crimes and eliminated Federal parole (Kendrick 2010-2011 pg 587-588). The introduction of mandatory minimums eliminated judicial discretion which allowed sentencing for crimes to be decided on a case by case basis. Mandatory minimums leave offenders in prison for longer amounts of time than they would if judicial discretion was used and treat all offenders the same, no matter what their circumstances are


1053 words - 4 pages trial. ("Plea Bargains: Why and When They're Made." 2002. FindLaw. 10 Mar 2004.>).There are several reasons for plea bargains. In most cases, the plea bargain is to avoid the uncertainty of the jury trial. In other cases, a defendant may have pertenant information regarding other criminals allowing the broader prosecution of other crimes. And in still other cases, prosecutors may be convinced that

Mandatory Sentencing

1776 words - 7 pages Mandatory sentencing is not anything new. It began in the 1970s. The main purpose for mandatory sentencing was to try to get rid of the drug lords and to eliminate most of the nation’s street drug selling. It was to impose that the same crime would have the same sentence all over the nation. Some of the negatives that rose from mandatory sentencing were nonviolent drug offenders and first time offenders who were receiving harsh sentences. Inmate

Negative Consequences of Mandatory Sentencing

891 words - 4 pages , have the discretion to decide what charge to bring; whether to accept or deny a plea bargain. Mandatory sentencing is defined as: a sentence determined by statutes and requiring that a certain penalty be imposed and carried out for convicted offenders who meet certain criteria. This definition should include required drug intervention, mental health treatment, and drug education with the possibility of early release if the prisoner

The Role of the Prosecutor

892 words - 4 pages throughout the criminal process. Some of which are investigating, plead bargains, questioning both jurors and witnesses, and being involved through the sentencing as well.The first thing that must be understood is that the duty of the prosecutor is to seek justice, not merely to convict. It is crucial that his obligation is to protect the innocent as well as to convict the guilty, to guard the rights of the accused as well as to enforce the rights


1663 words - 7 pages could not function unless there were drastic increases in budget allowance. The courts are at present full and running over and if all the cases were to be tried the courts budgets would have to be increased5) For a judge, the primary incentive for accepting a plea bargain is to move along a crowded calendar. Most judges simply don't have time to try every case that comes through the door. Judges often reason that using plea bargains to "process

Racial Discrimination in the US Judicial System

2425 words - 10 pages circumvent the system by working out plea bargains for lesser charges for cooperation with authorities. In the 2005 case of US v. Booker, the Supreme Court determined that a judge can only base a sentence on prior convictions and facts presented at trial. This also gave federal judges the right to sentence criminals outside of the Federal Guidelines range, as long as the court can explain “why a sentence outside of the Sentencing Guideline range better serves the relevant purposes set forth.” (6) Even though the racial discrepancies between crack and cocaine still exist, the debate on rewriting the laws continues.

Plea Bargaining

1447 words - 6 pages Plea bargaining is definitely crucial to our justice system, and increasing the number of plea bargains would definitely be of great help to Canada. There is no doubt that without the option of plea bargaining, our justice system would be very flawed. If we were to give the option of plea bargaining to more criminals, Canada would benefit greatly. There are three arguments that will clearly show how increasing the rate of plea bargains will help

Mass incarceration of African Americans, The Revised Caste System

2070 words - 9 pages and permanently locked out are Black and Brown” (p. 139). Almost all cases go to trial. Prosecutors, who are the most powerful within the court systems, overcharge defendant and force defendants into plea bargains. Defendants, weather truly guilty or not would rather accept a plea bargain by pleading guilty and accept lower sentencing then risk mandatory 5 to 10 years in prison for drug charges. The extreme sentencing has forced most defendants

Similar Essays

Plea Bargaining Essay

1170 words - 5 pages , Plea Bargains and Mandatory Sentencing, James Doran wrote that “Plea bargains offer a solution that saves the time and expense of trials, jury selections, appeals, etc. Some opponents of plea bargains, however, believe they reduce the American system of justice to a business affair” (Doran, 2005). At times this can probably be considered true, but looking at the whole picture, plea bargains are doing much more good than bad. On a more personal

Plea Bargains Essay

809 words - 4 pages 95% of all criminal cases are resolved by plea bargains, the new face of America's criminal justice system. Plea bargains are only beneficial for the government and the justice system, not the people. Plea bargains are not effective in the judicial due process because they result in lenient deals on sentencing, violate the people's constitutional rights and punish the innocent. Plea bargains undermine the criminal justice system because they

Sentencing Guidelines In The Criminal Justice System

3816 words - 16 pages range then allows the prosecutors to tell criminals how much prison time they could be facing. The prosecutor chooses what level of offense to charge them with and they are rarely asked to explain why they chose a certain level of offense (Leonard-Kempf and Sample 2001 p.115). This newfound power gave the prosecutors the upper-hand in sentencing criminals. Before this shift in power, prosecutors could make plea bargains but judges could override

Plea Bargain Essay

1108 words - 5 pages the change of being found guilty at trial. However, it is important to remember the reason for the plea bargain, which includes saving tax payers money. The first, reason for plea bargains, is that it saves tax payers’ money. Trials are expensive. There is the cost of a lawyer, if the defendant cannot afford one. There is the cost of paying the jury, and other staff along with other expenses. Also, there is the appeal process which is very