Political Action And Morality In Machiavellian Times

1453 words - 6 pages

The Renaissance era of Europe produced a great multitude of political thinkers. Among this plethora is perhaps the most controversial philosopher of his age, Niccolò Machiavelli. The Florentine politician, known most famously for his work, The Prince, discusses, among other things, the relationship between morality and political action. However, unlike the vast majority of his European predecessors, who often argued that political power should be in the hands of the morally virtuous ruler, Machiavelli produces a contrary argument, in which morality plays no role in judging the difference between legitimate and illegitimate uses of power. To this end, he argues that a ruler’s only concerns ...view middle of the document...

With this in mind, Machiavelli then launches into a series of discussions where he methodically breaks down the impracticalities of maintaining certain qualities as the sovereign. Generosity, or liberality, ought to be avoided, as it results in raising taxes on the people. Parsimony, or the act of being miserly, is more fortuitous in the long run for a sovereign, allowing for excess funds which can be put toward the benefit of the state. Mercy, like money, is also a precious commodity which Machiavelli cautions should not be given freely.
Using the case of Cesare Borgia’s rise to power in Romania as an example, Machiavelli argues in favor of using cruelty as a political tool. By making an example of traitors and malcontents early on in one’s reign, the loyalty and unity of the people can be won. Cruelty directed toward a few is, in fact, merciful to the masses, as crime will affect everyone, but executions affect only individuals. However, he cautions that the prince should, “proceed in a temperate manner with prudence and humanity.”
Following this example, Machiavelli then presents his most infamous argument in which he debates whether it is better for a prince to be loved or feared. Unlike love, which must be constantly maintained, and can be abandoned at any time, fear is a deeply instilled emotion, which does not easily break. A prince, should, therefore, inspire fear in such a way that, if he cannot win love, he will avoid hatred. Hatred, something no prince would ever want, can be avoided if the prince can, “keep his hands off the property of others, because men more quickly forget the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony.” With this attitude in mind, Machiavelli concludes that a prince can choose to be either feared or loved, provided he fulfills the criteria of avoiding hatred.
Despite convincing arguments in favor of Machiavelli supporting a prince capable of performing evil in the defense of his power and state, there is, however, a group of scholars and historians who believe Machiavelli’s work to present a different message. Rather than separate morality from political action, there is evidence, they claim, that supports the theory of Machiavelli believing the two to be inexorably linked. Rather than a “teacher of evil”, Machiavelli is merely a realist taking a new approach to politics.
In Chapter 8 of The Prince, Machiavelli recounts the tales of rulers throughout history who rose to power through cruelty and criminal behavior. When speaking of their actions, he acknowledges that their cruel actions were done properly, but is quick to remark, “If it be permitted to speak well of things evil, which are done once for all under the necessity of self-preservation, and are not afterwards persisted in.” Machiavelli, it seems, does not delight in evil, but believes that it should be allowable in times of necessity, and, even then, kept to an appropriate minimum. All actions undertaken should be for the...

Find Another Essay On Political Action and Morality in Machiavellian Times

The Ancient Mariner and Victor Frankenstein: Morality, Socialization, Action and Responsibility

2340 words - 9 pages Mariner suffer from in their separate works. They both lack “social belongingness” caused by their own different quests for knowledge and discovery fueled by their egoism. Both characters believed their discoveries would benefit the greater good of society but both ended up being sorely mistaken. While both characters tackle this rather large social and political issue of the time, as well as the issues of morality and spirituality, Coleridge and

The Times of Harvey Milk: The political and social issues surrounding the first gay elected official in the U.S. The essay uses the documentary "The times of Harvey Milk" as a springboard

858 words - 3 pages The Times Of Harvey MilkThe documentary "The Times of Harvey Milk" did not concentrate on the fact that Harvey was gay. As the title says, it concentrates on the times and the events surrounding Harvey and his politics. It was a side note, like mentioning that any other political figure was married or had children. The gay rights movement was only one of the many things he was involved with. Mr. Milk was a certainly a gay activist, but it was

Human Morality in Hamlet and The Oresteia

1511 words - 7 pages morality has been undermined to fit his course of action. Since his “moral approbation has met that threshold… [Hamlet] is more likely to act in accordance with that plan” (Jones, Ryan 663), and his cognitive dissonance is finally balanced out. Although his inner conflicts have finally eradicated, his decision yields repercussions that Shakespeare emphasizes in order to critic society’s moral stigma. Hamlet’s ultimate decision therefore represents the

Finn and Jim: Brothers in Morality

1229 words - 5 pages The issue of morality is at the forefront of Mark Twain's Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Throughout the text, Finn is presented with clashing ideals of what is moral and socially acceptable. He learns that civilization expects one set of morals, and as a youth, he is educated to believe this is right. As he ages and gains experiences in life, he learns that the reality of life is not as morally righteous as he expected, given the focus of

Love and Morality in Le Morte Darthur

762 words - 3 pages characteristics of a knight as well as the concept of morality in Arthurian times. From childhood, we learn about gallant knights in shining armour who heroically save the damsel in distress on their brilliantly white horse. We believe these men to be good-hearted, moral, and emotionally sound. It is nearly sacrilegious to merely conceptualize a knight who is corrupt or evil in any way. Many of these ideals stem from the Knights of the Round Table, who

Values and Morality in Literary Works

3435 words - 14 pages Values and Morality in Literary Works My theme that I have found in every short story, poem, play and many other works was values or morality. At first I didn't realize that there was anything but love in all the works. Without the help of Mr. Johnson, I would have never thought that there was anything but love in most of the works. As I read the works again I realized that there was more in the works besides love. I found out that

Morality and Revenge in Shakespeare's Hamlet

790 words - 3 pages and uncorrupt mind, but also avenge his fathers’ murder, Hamlet forges a letter in order to demonize and vilify Claudius in order to claim the throne. Shakespeare’s Hamlet takes place in a medieval and diseased Denmark that allows for injustices, revenge, etc. Hamlet is often thought of as a play about revenge, whereas in actuality it is a play about morality and the consequences of poorly thought out and impulsive actions. Despite the brutal

Promoting Morality in the Aeneid and Metamorphoses

1653 words - 7 pages Promoting Morality in the Aeneid and Metamorphoses   Just as the authors of the Bible use an evocative, almost mythological vehicle to convey covenants and laws that set the moral tone for Hebrew and Christian societies, Latin poets Virgil and Ovid employ a similarly supernatural method to foster their own societal and moral goals in Roman society. Where Virgil's Aeneid depicts Aeneas as the ideal, duty-bound Roman patriarch absent from

Morality in Victorian and Neo-Victorian Novels

5772 words - 23 pages Morality in Victorian and Neo-Victorian Novels An essay on Jane Eyre, The Mill on the Floss, The French Lieutenant's Woman, Possession and The Dress Lodger The Victorian era is one bound to morality. Morality is also defined through the traditional and religious standards that structure the way of life for many Victorians. Morality is defined as the proper principles and standards, in respect to right and wrong, which are to be


2143 words - 9 pages business endeavors. Hume (2003) suggests that the deontological theory defines the degree to which an act conforms to the recognized societal norms and moral duties in the business world. For instance, in the finance industry, an employee refers a client to his friend’s business firm ignoring the fact that the firm he is working at also needs clients who can use the same services. This theory fails to look into the aspect whether the action was

The Underworld and Morality in Vergil's Aeneid

1063 words - 4 pages The Underworld and Morality in Vergil's Aeneid Book IV of the Aeneid can stand alone as Vergil's highest literary achievement, but centered in the epic, it provides a base for the entire work. The book describes Aeneas's trip through the underworld, where after passing through the depths of hell, he reaches his father Anchises in the land of Elysium. Elysium is where the "Soul[s] to which Fate owes Another flesh" lie (115). Here Anchises

Similar Essays

Separating Political Conduct And Personal Morality In Niccolò Machiavelli's, The Prince

2129 words - 9 pages Separating Political Conduct and Personal Morality in Niccolò Machiavelli's, The Prince Niccolò Machiavelli wrote, in his novel The Prince, that strong central political leadership was more important than anything else, including religion and moral behavior. Machiavelli, writing during a period of dramatic change known as the Italian Renaissance, displayed attitudes towards many issues, mostly political, which supported his belief that

Ethics And Morality In Philosophy Essay

873 words - 3 pages Morality has always been an unacknowledged and crucial role in defining ethics. Principles tend to be a virtue that applies only within society and can be distinguished from law, religion, or ethics. Morality in its defining sense can be different from each other, depending on the foundations of the society that claim their morality. Different societies have a different sense of what their moral priority would be like. Their morality can be

Ethics And Morality In Vegetarianism Essay

2414 words - 10 pages morality, then there will be significant changes that will ameliorate the whole world for the better. Works Cited Animals and Alternatives in Toxicology. Present Status and Future Prospects / Edited by M.Balis, J.Bridges, J.Southee. Macmillan Press, London,1991. Brophy, Brigid. "The Rights of Animals." Sunday Times (1965). Cooper ME. An Introduction to Animal Law. Academic Press. London-NewYork, 1978. Hamilton, Malcolm. "Eating Ethically

Morality And Ethics In Vegetarianism Essay

838 words - 4 pages feeling of compassion, people began to feel uncomfortable by the fact that their actions were constantly associated with the infliction of suffering to other beings and even their killing. Even in ancient times high minds have concluded that man as being rational and moral should not defile themselves with murder. The alternative is to live a more moral, more humane life, without killing animals. Humanity will then become higher in the spiritual sense and feel a beneficial effect of merciful attitude to the weakest.