Positve Psychology And Aristotle's Virtue Ethics Converge

1627 words - 7 pages

Positive psychology and Aristotle: A convergence of ideas
The field of positive psychology, founded by Martin Seligman (1998), seeks to influence individuals whose lives are “neutral” and increase their psychological well-being. Positive psychology offers a unique perspective on mental health through focusing on individual strengths rather than dysfunction, pathology, and mental illness (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). The goal of positive psychology is to assist individuals in creating meaningful lives through the promotion of positive emotions, individual character strengths, as well as, eudemonic happiness, as key components to optimal mental health. Like many other contemporary theories, positive psychology borrows principles and tenets of philosophies, which preceded its formal conception. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast virtue, character strengths, relationships, and happiness as presented by positive psychology with Aristotle’s virtue ethics theory.
Positive psychology utilizes five pillars in order to flourish, achieve fulfillment, and satisfaction in life: Positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment (PERMA). The five mainstays of positive psychology are not intended to be means to some other end; these foundations are selected for their own value in personal efforts to flourish, and are fundamental to human well-being. Positive psychology describes the “good life” as being pleasant, engaging, meaningful, and full of achievements and connections. Seligman proposes positive subjective experiences illicit and promote positive emotions. Positive psychology distinguishes two types of happiness that can be derived from experiences and events: Hedonic and eudemonic happiness. Hedonism describes immediate sensory gratification, with focus on the maximization of pleasure and the minimization of pain; Conversely, eudemonia, describes “true happiness” which involves identifying one’s virtues, cultivating them, and living a life congruent with these ideals. Contemporary research suggests that eudemonia is a better predictor of life satisfaction than hedonistic pleasure; findings from a study conducted by Huta, Park, Peterson, & Seligman (2005) demonstrate that those who pursue eudemonic goals and activities are more satisfied than those who solely pursue pleasure. (Peterson, 2006)
It has been stated “happiness is the aim of life, but virtue is the foundations of happiness” (Thomas Jefferson, 1819). Seligman proposes that the identification and use of positive individual strengths of character, associated with virtue, are important components to achieving eudemonic happiness and in creating and sustaining a meaningful life. Virtues and strengths can serve as defenses during times of adversity, as well as, have the ability to enhance the healthier moments in life. The Values in Action (VIA) classification system contains 24 strengths of character that are sub-categories of six cross-culturally...

Find Another Essay On Positve Psychology and Aristotle's Virtue Ethics Converge

Distributive Justice: Inequality in Virtue Ethics and Ethical Egoism

1981 words - 8 pages reason for intervention. Charity through the lens of virtue ethics provides a normative framework to reduce inequality for the benefit of society and the individual. Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics outlines the proper application of charity with respect to the individual's position: “for what is generous does not depend on the quantity or what is given, but on the state [of character] of the giver, and the generous state gives in accord with

Aristotle's Approach to Ethics and Plato's Divided Line

780 words - 3 pages Aristotle's Approach to Ethics and Plato's Divided Line I. PLATO 3) Explain the so-called ‘Divided Line’. What do the different levels mean? How does this apply to ethics? How does this apply to Knowledge, perception, and/or awareness? Explain in depth and detail. Plato’s ‘Divided Line’ is a model indicating not only levels of knowledge, but basically levels of everything. It is divided into four levels and two sides. The

Child Custody and Homosexuality. Ethics in Psychology/Counseling or dealing with children.

2630 words - 11 pages life.References Used:American Psychological Association (2002). APA online. http://www.apa.org/Jordan, A.E. & Meara, N.M. (1990). Ethics and the professional practice of psychologists: The role of virtues and principles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 107-114Kaslow, FW (2001). Families and family psychology at the millennium:Intersecting perspectives. American Psychologist, 56, 37-46.Krauss, D.A., & Sale, B. D., (2000) Legal

Aristotle His Life, Works, and Influence

1223 words - 5 pages . Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics is an analysis of character and intelligence as they relate to happiness. Aristotle distinguished two kinds of human virtues: moral and intellectual. Moral virtue is an expression of character, formed by habits reflecting repeated choices. A moral virtue is always a mean between two less desirable extremes. Courage, for example, is a mean between being a coward and and being rash. Intellectual virtues are not subject to

Aristotelian versus Kantian Ethics

1780 words - 7 pages Aristotle's and Kant's ideas of the means and ends of moral ethics are in sharp contrast. Both have strengths and weaknesses in their arguments, but Aristotle's is superior to Kant's because it is more realistic. I will first give the basis of both philosophies, Aristotle first, Kant second. Next, I will expand and question points of both philosophies, Aristotle's end, and Kant's means. Lastly, I will explain the reasoning behind why I favor

The Life And Works of Aristotle

2258 words - 9 pages cause, as pure intellect, perfect in unity, immutable, and, as he said, 'the thought of thought,' is given in the Metaphysics. To his son Nicomachus he dedicated his work on ethics, called the Nicomachean Ethics. Other essential works include his Rhetoric, his Poetics (which survives in incomplete form), and his Politics (also incomplete).MethodsPerhaps because of the influence of his father's medical profession, Aristotle's philosophy laid its

Virtue of Aristotelian Ethics

3683 words - 15 pages , Alasdair. After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press, 1981. p 139.]It is precisely because of its difficult and often ambiguous nature, in my view and contrary to Aristotle's, it is extremely important to teach young people virtue based ethics, so they might begin to hone their skills at an earlier age. It is not expected that those who have not lived long enough to grasp the subtleties of good character apply Aristotelian ethics perfectly or even

On Aristotles Notion of Happiness

1469 words - 6 pages 'supremely happy' in so long as he is living .Thus we've come to understand Aristotle's notion of happiness as the completeness of a life ripe with virtue (in regards to activities conducted) and excellence (in regards to training, learning, and discipline). This is a breathe of fresh air, when compared to our modern, more materialistic view of happiness, seen by many as simply the accumulation of wealth over life's span. It is then of no wonder why such a work as the Nicomachean Ethics remains not only at the frontlines of political theory, but also and especially at that of ethical theory as well.

Magnanimity.

1757 words - 7 pages honors the magnanimous man claims for himself do not benefit himself alone, for those honors necessarily entail exertion on behalf of the political community. On the basis of Aristotle's argument in book 2 of the Nicomachean Ethics, one must conclude that the great-souled man does owe his virtue in large part to someone else. A magnanimous man's moral excellence, and hence his worthiness of great honors, can be said to be to a great extent the

Aristotle's Argument for People's Actions

654 words - 3 pages , consistently take things seriously, and engage in serious action. This would make for an impossible doing by a human being. For one cannot act in perfect virtue all the time. Does this mean he will never attain happiness? Aristotle's definition of happiness is utilitarian. What Aristotle is arguing is theory that the aim of action should be the largest possible balance of pleasure over pain or the greatest happiness for the greatest number, the

Nichomachean Ethics by Aristotle: Arguments on Courage, Justice, and Pseudo-Courage.

1972 words - 8 pages character) and execute them always in ethical dilemmas.Another aspect of Aristotle's dissertation is his discussion of when virtuous actions do not possess the ethical virtue associated with that action. A good example of this erroneous state has to do with the virtue of courage. Actual acts of courage may seem like they possess the virtue of courage, when in fact they do not. Since performing an action does not guarantee acquisition of the

Similar Essays

Aristotle's Notion On Eudaimonia And Virtue

1807 words - 7 pages In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics he accounts that humans should make sacrifices and should ultimately aim first and foremost for their own happiness . In the paper I will argue that it is really in a person’s best interest to be virtuous . I will do this by first describing Aristotle’s notion on both eudaimonia and virtue , as well as highlighting the intimate relationship between the two . Secondly I will talk about the human role in society

Virtue Ethics And Business Ethics Essay

2835 words - 11 pages Virtue Ethics and Business Ethics When considering Aristotelian ethics and then placing them in the context of modern business practices, it is important to note that the Greek paradigm was very different to that of our own in the modernist age. Homer’s Greek myths, imminent wars and conflicts and empires were all important issues in Greek times, society however does not place such emphasis on these in today’s society

Nicomachean Ethics: Friendship, Virtue And Happiness

935 words - 4 pages                 In the writings of Aristotle, seen in Nicomachean Ethics, it is evident that Aristotle believes that friendship is necessary for a virtuous and therefore happy life. I believe that this is accurate due to the similar conditions necessary for a complete friendship and a happy life. It is also evident that friendship is useful in achieving a happy life because friendship can make performing virtuous actions easier. His

Friendship And Self Love In Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

1663 words - 7 pages the qualities of proper self-love since a true friend is another self. One's friends are mirror images of oneself, and so in a true friendship one wishes the good for the other and helps him/her to achieve a character of virtue. "For those who are friends on the ground of virtue are anxious to do well by each other." (Nicomachean Ethics-Book VIII: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.8.viii.html). It is believed that one will treat a close