Prisoner's Dilemma Essay

674 words - 3 pages

In the prisoner's dilemma game, the situation is that Albert, a fictitious person, and I are accused of committing a crime. Whether or not we committed the crime is not relevant as we are both being held in separate room for interrogation. The purpose of the game is not to necessarily prove my innocence, but rather to limit the number of jail we, combined, spend in jail. There are different strategies I can choose for Albert to follow. These include: the golden rule, the brazen rule, the brazen rule 3, the iron rule, and unknown. This, I thought, would make the game quite easy.When the golden rule was applied (which states, do onto others as you would want done to you) I knew the Albert would not confess; I, too, chose not to confess. The result was that we were both given 2 years. I went back and played again to see if my strategy was the best one. The second time I chose to confess. I found that I got off with no time in jail, but Albert was given 5 years. A combined 4 years is better than the 5 years the Albert got, so therefore I won the game.When the brazen rule was applied, I was confused at the result at first. The brazen rule states, repay kindness with kindness. I chose to confess and we both got 4 years. I then went back and tried other scenarios. I tried to not confess and I got 5 years, while Albert was let free. I then chose to not confess again and we both did not confessed and got 2 years each. I then realized that Albert repaid my kindness and the second time caught on to what I was doing and followed suit. The brazen 3 rule worked much the same way as the brazen rule with a slight variation. After analyzing both versions of the brazen rule I found that in the brazen rule,...

Find Another Essay On Prisoner's dilemma

Game Theories, Liberal Legacies, and International Institutions: How Do They Connect?

1016 words - 5 pages Cooperation in World Politics,” three games are games are mentioned: Prisoner's Dilemma, Stag Hunt, and Chicken. The overall reason for including these examples was to show the relationship between mutual cooperation relative to mutual defection and the payoffs of unilateral defection relative to unrequited cooperation. The main focus in Prisoner's Dilemma was loyalty versus betrayal. Would my partner rat me out to get off free and leave me to

The concept of Nash equilibrium is fine in theory, but next to useless in practice

812 words - 4 pages thefts and now they are referencing. Once it gives out a payoff matrix of the thefts (Fig 1.) and result in how many months they are in jail, as the theft is telling the truth (Cooperate) or lying (Defect), first payoff will be player 1’s and the second following will represent as player 2’s. (James et al., 1993) Fig 1. The Prisoner’s Dilemma ‘Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Experimental Evidence ‘(James et al

about ethics

8550 words - 34 pages everyone else is following, "For no man who is worthy to be called a man would ever submit to such an agreement if he were able to resist; he would be mad if he did."' In this account, justice is characterized as creating the kind of situation that contemporary game theory calls a "prisoners dilemma."* Prisoner's dilemmas are situations in which two parties are faced with a choice between two options: to cooperate in some course of action, or to not

PRISM Case Study

1243 words - 5 pages strategy, the resulting payoffs are smaller than if each had played a dominated strategyThis action profile does not have a Prisoner's Dilemma due none of the options having 'equal footing'. Nor would they have smaller resulting payoffs if the players played their dominate strategy.

Game Theory: Thinking in Positive and Negative Possibilities

1430 words - 6 pages could hire a person to hurt person Y, which would not kill anyone and it would stop Person Y from being dishonest again. A non-zero sum game is a game that has one player that wins, and the consequences will not harm the losing player. A very famous example of non-zero sum games is the Prisoner's Dilemma. The Prisoner's Dilemma was created by Robert Axelrod in 1984. This game includes two prisoners that have been arrested. They are wanted for

Decision making

510 words - 2 pages goodness we measure against our values.There is one game that has been studied extensively, both theoretically and empirically and it's called the Prisoner's Dilemma. In this game between two players, each has a choice between two actions, one trustful of the other player, the other mistrustful of exploitative. If both players choose the trustful alternative, both receive small rewards. If both choose the exploitative alternative, both are

Rational Expectations

1056 words - 5 pages the rules , and everyone loses. This is known as the Prisoner's Dilemma situation , due to the famous example of it provided by the mathematician Albert Tucker . Gauthier says , however, that if an individual depends act of compliance for a social contract , and it makes the contract only with individuals who seem ready to adopt a similar act , then it is in the rational self-interest of the individual to honor the contract until the situation in

This is a speech for a US Representative running for Senate. Includes problems that Congress has and 3 proposals to fix it

2109 words - 8 pages second, each congressman wants to do as much as they can for their own constituents, not thinking that this could in turn hurt the country as a whole.Another example of an collective dilemma is the prisoner's dilemma. Now for this I want you to "imagine that you and an accomplice have been arrested for a crime. The police place each of you in an isolation cell, so you cannot communicate with each other. Both you and your accomplice know that

Thomas Hobbes' First Three Laws of Nature and the Fool's Objection

1547 words - 6 pages conservative choice and obey the rules of society. This is best explained by The Prisoner's Dilemma: (Image: In accordance with Hobbes' views, The Prisoner's Dilemma shows that both Prisoner A and Prisoner B marinating their covenants and not confessing leads to only a year in prison, the conservative

The influence of Anchoring

854 words - 4 pages /0146167282082005 Ellis, A. (1947). A comparison of the use of direct and indirect phrasing in personality questionnaires. Psychological Monographs, 61(3), i-41. doi:10.1037/h0093564 Liberman, V., Samuels, S. M., & Ross, L. (2004). The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations Versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner's Dilemma Game Moves. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1175-1185. doi:10.1177

Innocent Imprisonment

687 words - 3 pages . They are many other groups both participating in freeing prisoners as well as raising awareness. It's a bigger problem than people think. There is also something called an innocent prisoner's dilemma, aka 'Parole Deal', in which people admit to guilt in order to get reduced sentences or early parole. It's like deciding to be free by admitting to something you didn't do or serving a sentence for telling the truth. It really comes down to honesty

Similar Essays

Question And Answers: Destructive Behaviors, Prisoner's Dilemma And Grit

1298 words - 5 pages prisoner’s dilemma and the resource dilemma. How can we solve these dilemmas and how might solutions differ between cultures? The prisoner’s dilemma is a social dilemma that offers two choices for a person. The first choice is a cooperative move in regards to another person, while the second choice is a competitive move (Kassin et al, 2010). In this dilemma, the competitive move is designed to appear to be in the person’s best interest. However, when

Capitalism's Role In Unethical Behavior Essay

1281 words - 5 pages understand the mechanics of a marketplace void of sophisticated consumer behavior, it is instructive to examine a well-known framework commonly referred to as the "prisoner's dilemma."The prisoner's dilemmaThe "prisoner's dilemma" belongs to a branch of mathematics, known as game theory. It provides explanatory frameworks for understanding competitive behavior under conditions of limited information (Axelrod 1984; Fader and Hanser 1988). As

Prisoners Dilemma Essay

1042 words - 4 pages THE PRISONER'S DILEMMA (I). In the prisoner's dilemma two people have been arrested, the one inmate is called Smith. In this situation the authorities are not interested in the truth but only want to convict someone. An interrogator lays out the consequences for Smith. If Smith does not confess but the other guy confesses against Smith, they will release him and Smith will be put away for ten years. If Smith confesses and the other guy does not

The Prisoners' Dilemma. Are We All Prisoners?

1783 words - 7 pages the time practiced defectors in the prisoner's dilemma: the future has no shadow because it is never clear to whom one should assign the defection. Actually, politicians are playing two simultaneous games: with each other and with the voting public. Their game with each other tends to be a more cooperative one because the future casts a shadow; but the game with the voting public, as I mentioned above, is based on repeated defection because the