For years the people have fought for power, and freedom to govern and live free and together as a strong united nation but due to recent events our nation and our views have been getting more distant and distant. It seems that the main focus between the people is on rather or not we should be pro-security or we should be pro-privacy. And of course there are those who look at both sides and sit in the middle. But, at this present time what does our nation really need to stay strong and stay protected from the threats that wait in and outside our front doors. That is what I will be discussing in my essay I will be covering both sides of the argument providing evidence to show why people of either pro-security or pro-privacy would feel the way they do. But, ultimately I will be stating my point as a pro-security person. My main arguments will be how security is of higher importance than privacy, the impact of having less security, why telling the people more of what the government is doing will be a negative for the nation.
When it comes to the side of being pro-privacy there is this belief that the government has either failed to protect the privacy of the people or that the government itself has done too much to the point that the people want the government in a sense to back off and give the people more freedom to do what they do on a everyday basis without that feeling that someone is always watching them. But, what is privacy without security? That is what I would ask someone that was pro-privacy. I would also tell them to imagine this example: if you were to be on your computer and you put files and other things that you wouldn’t want others to look at you would have some form of security in place to prevent people from accessing these files. Now think if you weren’t able to imply these security measures because you didn’t want a company to be watching what you put on your computer then someone would be able to just access that information with out even physically being on your computer.
On the other end of that example a person may say things like “my privacy can’t be taken if I always protect it” or things like “ I am the only person that uses my computer”. My counter-argument to that would be like I said, if a person wanted to get another persons secretive or public information they can do that from the comfort of their home. The only way to actually defend yourself from identity theft, and hackers would be to apply some form of security be that security be as simple as having a password to access your information or as complex as having back-up cloud systems, encryption coding, and firewalls to fully protect yourself.
Another key point a pro-privacy person would try to say would be “even if I do use some form of security there is that someone who is watching...