Protectionism And Free Trade In America

2094 words - 8 pages

The argument regarding protectionism and free trade in America can be traced back to our Founding Fathers. The first significant legislation passed by the First congress in 1789 and signed into law by President Washington on July Fourth was a protectionist tariff that provided for over 90 percent of the revenues to operate the new government and encouraged the building of industries and development of family farms. In contrast, Benjamin Franklin, who understood the danger of trade restrictions said, “No nation is ever ruined by free trade.” The argument has continued throughout history and is a major issue in current politics. To better understand this argument I turned to our most valuable resource, history, and as a result have found free trade with all nations to be the only correct policy for United States government. Tariffs should only be used to fund the necessary functions of government. (Ideally I feel there should be no tariffs or excise taxes.) .”
Prior to ratification of the Constitution, states had their own development policies. Delegates from the states sent to Constitutional Convention in 1787 put high priority on solving problems of interstate trade amongst states. Delegates chose to eliminate trade barriers between states. This allowed the division of labor to develop freely, thereby greatly increasing productivity. Despite our government’s insight into the benefits of free trade amongst states, protectionist ideals were still passed.
Trade restrictions on foreign products, also known as protective tariffs, were used by Alexander Hamilton during George Washington’s presidency. James Madison agreed with Secretary of Treasury Hamilton, with the belief that imposing protective tariffs such as the Tariff of 1816 would allow American producers to compete with their lower-priced foreign competitors. Acceptance of Hamilton's pro-industrial, anti-agricultural, anti-British foreign policy led to a series of international trade barriers, like the Embargo Act and the Non-Intercourse Act, extreme protectionist measures. Beginning with the tariff of 1816 these measures led to the Tariff of Abominations in 1828 that pitted the agricultural South against the industrial North. South Carolina led the way in nullifying the Tariff Acts of 1828 and 1832, and threatened secession of the national government.
Just as the states were forbidden to manage interstate commerce, the national government should have been forbidden to manage international commerce.
Protectionists argue that by raising tariffs on imports; foreign producers will be forced to raise the prices of exported goods, thus making it easier for domestic producers to compete. Although this seems like a reasonable action, history has shown us that American consumers are the ones who pay for our government’s good intentions. Tariffs, quotas and other trade barriers artificially raise the cost of foreign goods but they also increase the price that consumers must pay. I hold an opinion...

Find Another Essay On Protectionism and Free Trade in America

Bush Free-Trade Diplomacy Has Corporate America Steaming

800 words - 3 pages BUSH'S FREE-TRADE DIPLOMACY HAS CORPORATE AMERICA STEAMING Business Week; New York; Jul 7, 2003; Paul Magnusson; Mike McNamee;The Bush Administration has a new weapon in the war against terrorism: offering free-trade deals to allies from Australia and Morocco to the tiny Persian Gulf emirate of Bahrain. But the GOP's business allies aren't impressed. They complain that such grand diplomacy makes for poor trade policy. Sensing a way to mend

Free Trade: America Should NOT Protect Industries from Foreign Competition

861 words - 3 pages Free Trade: America Should NOT Protect Industries from Foreign Competition Many politicians oppose free international trade, trade without any restrictions, for a couple of reasons. From their point of view it would affect the United States in several ways: 1. Many USA workers would lose their jobs because factories would be moved to the country with whom the U.S. has a Free Trade Agreement, and where working force

An essay on U.S. trade barriers and protectionism.

3142 words - 13 pages "Behind a tariff wall built by Washington, Hamilton, Clay, Lincoln, and the Republican presidents who followed, the United States had gone from an agrarian coastal republic to become the greatest industrial power the world had ever seen -- in a single century. Such was the success of the policy called protectionism that is so disparaged today."- Buchanan on the history of U.S. protectionism:Historical Perspectives on U.S. Trade PolicyThe recent

Globalisation and free trade.

2332 words - 9 pages demonstrate or measure the impact of free trade in a dynamic global economy with many products and many countries.Task 2Do reductions in domestic protection endanger domestic industries and jobs?Tariff rates and other forms of domestic protection are designed to protect domestic industries from foreign competition and raise government revenue. Domestic protectionism can breed inefficiency and divert resources away from other industries, which have higher

Australia and Free trade

2571 words - 10 pages 1980's, and the negotiation of free trade agreements (FTAs), or more precisely, preferential trade agreements (PTAs). FTAs are multilateral in nature, encompassing majority of global nations. Such agreements are mediated through the World Trade Organization and negotiated at the Doha round. Current negotiations have been broken down since 2008, when constituents were unable to reach a compromise on agricultural trade-barriers. PTAs are distinct

Imperialism and Free Trade

2094 words - 8 pages to provide the framework of security for British enterprise (whether commercial, philanthropic or simple strategic) that the question of establishing formal empire arose”[10]. Gallagher and Robinson argue that this age of free trade can be seen as an age of expansion without responsibility. The opening up of markets in Africa, Asia, South America and the South Pacific can be strongly connected to imperial interest and an

Free Trade Area (FTA) Analysis in China

2445 words - 10 pages more willingness to invest "internally". From the rest of the world, once MNEs invest in one member country, it can possibly get access to other members' markets with less cost, as the FTA combines all the members' markets in to a single one. Take North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) for example, Table 1 compares the mean (magnitude) and standard deviation (volatility) of FDI flows of for the year 1983-1993 (before NAFTA) and 1994-1998

Pros and Cons of Free Trade

1481 words - 6 pages Geography: Pros and Cons of Free Trade Few can contend that the world is more interconnected and interrelated more than ever. This web of interdependency is primarily made possible by trade, and in the twenty-first century, a large and significant portion of trade is conducted on a global scale. Furthermore, while the majority of people agree that free trade can benefit both parties in terms of economic development and an increase in overall

The Pros and Cons of Free Trade

1107 words - 4 pages Free Trade is the ability to trade goods and services without barriers, and for prices to rise naturally through supply and demand. In theory, Free Trade was a way to break down the barriers between countries, banishing taxes and allowing prices to be naturally set through supply and demand. According to the World Trade Organization, this gives the poor countries the opportunity to specialize in the production of goods that derive from their

Thw WTO, Free Trade and Globalization.

907 words - 4 pages Every one of us probably seen reports or heard something about demonstrations against globalization when international organizations like the WTO meet. One example was the G8 meeting in July 2001. We have to ask us the question why there are some people who protest against globalization and also against the free trade the WTO stands for.The main complaint and concern of these groups is unfairness. They say free trade is unfair, the low wages are

Environmental Protection and Free Trade Coexisting

2721 words - 11 pages Environmental Protection and Free Trade Coexisting An important issue in the international relations of the twentieth century involves whether or not free trade and environmental protection can coexist. The goal of a free trade economy is to increase the global economy, while environmental protectors try to find ways of reversing some of the negative effects that humans have inflicted upon the earth. Because of the increasing popularity

Similar Essays

Free Trade Vs Protectionism Essay

3984 words - 16 pages countries are violating the agreement, make them correct such violations and pay for damages, and even authorize retaliation against violators. Even though America seems to be the only country with a free trade policy, Lindsey argues that this statement is untrue. Import barriers are falling in different parts of the world, including Japan. Between 1968-1988 import growth has skyrocketed several times faster for America’s leading trading

Free Trade Vs Protectionism Essay

1335 words - 5 pages Free trade is a policy of imposing no restrictions on the movement of goods and services between countries. It will lead to the most efficient allocation of world resources and higher standards of living for all participating countries. Yet countries in the world see a need for protection. Protectionism is a policy of protecting home industries from foreign competition by the imposition of trade barriers on foreign goods and services. This is

The Choice: A Fable Of Free Trade And Protectionism

1065 words - 4 pages Book Review: The Choice: A Fable of Free Trade and Protectionism In the acclaimed novel, The Choice: A Fable of Free Trade and Protectionism, author Russell Roberts, an economist and writer, tells a fictional story that enlightens readers to the wonders of the economic system. Russell provides an insightful, thought provoking story that illustrates protectionism and free trade, while making the concepts and arguments easy to comprehend. The

Free Trade In South America: Mercosur And Other Groups

1643 words - 7 pages was created, the Latin American Free Trade Association (LAFTA) was established. This association was a free trade area that bridged the gap in between Central America and South America. The countries that made up LAFTA were Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay. LAFTA was made official of the 1960 Treaty of Montevideo, signed in January of 1962, two years after CACM was established. The goal of the treaty was to create a