This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Public Libraries Should Not Block Internet Pornography

2079 words - 8 pages

Since the internet has been available in schools and libraries in this country, there has been a debate about what should be accessible to users, especially minors. The amount of information disseminated on the world wide web is vast, with some sources valuable for scholarly and personal research and entertainment, and some sources that contain material that is objectionable to some (ie. pornography, gambling, hate groups sites, violent materials). Some information potentially accessible on the internet such as child pornography and obscenity is strictly illegal and is not protected under the First Amendment. Some information available on the internet that may be valuable to some is at the same time perceived to be worthless or potentially harmful to some. For libraries serving the public, there has been controversy on the issue of providing the internet, free of censorship or filtering, to users. While some librarians and their professional associations align with ideals of free and unfiltered access to all information provided by the internet, some feel that filtering internet content to exclude possibly objectionable materials is a reasonable measure to prevent potential harm to minors.
In 1998, a district court in Virginia made a ruling on the use of filtering software in public libraries that set a precedent for the unconstitutionality of internet filters. Todd Anten’s article, “Please Disable the Entire Filter: Why Non-Removable Filters on Public Library Computers Violate the First Amendment gives an account of the ruling. The Loudoun County Library had instituted restrictions to internet access on all library computers with software that would block sites that “displayed obscene material, child pornography, and material deemed harmful to minors” (Anten 74). This decision was based on general user input as to the materials that should be available in their community library. Plaintiffs claimed that constitutionally protected materials were wrongly blocked and that the Loudoun Policy violated their First Amendment rights. The court agreed and found the Loudoun Policy of filtering for all patrons unconstitutional. The court held that there were less restrictive means available to achieve the privacy level demanded by the Loudoun County community than interfering with free speech. Less restrictive, in the court’s opinion, were privacy screens for computer monitors and a certain degree of physical monitoring by library staff.
Congress made an attempt to place content-based restrictions on school and public library internet use in the Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) of 2000. This act requires the use of some type of internet filtering software for all public libraries that attain funds from the Federal government (in the form of E-rate discounts or Library Services and Technology Act grants). Should a library refuse to comply with CIPA guidelines, that library would have to maintain its technological...

Find Another Essay On Public Libraries Should Not Block Internet Pornography

The Internet Should not be Censored

1406 words - 6 pages address blocking would also block these genuine websites. The government also wants to block flash games and websites like Amazon and eBay because games can be obtained that have not been classified. The government is intending to use the filter for preventing online identity theft, cyber-bullying, photos published without permission, viruses, child predators and even computer addiction. This will not be fixed by an internet filter, and an

The Internet Should Not Be Censored

1121 words - 4 pages The internet should not be censored. Now what information could the government be hiding from us? This will be a question asked more often if the government's internet filter proposal goes through. The internet filter can hide information about controversial topics from existence in Australia. We citizens are to make our opinions and then vote for who we think has our best opinions. This is undemocratic, and is also against our human right of

Youth access to Internet Pornography; should it be banned? Title: Trash Folder is full

1450 words - 6 pages sex sites on the Internet"(61). If someone tried researching pornography censorship, several porn links would appear along with the results. The U.S. Supreme Court has tried to help reduce youth access by upholding a ruling that requires public libraries to have strict filtering programs (Rubin, 1). It is debated that the younger a child begins looking at pornography the higher the potential that youth will become a violent or sexually

"The term 'open society' has come into use in recent times. Are public libraries essential components of open societies? Why, or why not?"

1853 words - 7 pages an open society people must remember the key role libraries play, and the importance of intellectual freedom.For an open society to truly benefit from new ideas and a diversity of viewpoints, it is not enough for public libraries to provide free and open access to information. A library should not just act as a repository of ideas. Libraries need to actively promote the use of the library to their community and encourage them to take advantage of

Prayer Should Not be Recited in Public Schools

838 words - 4 pages Abington vs. Schempp In 1962, the Supreme Court ruled that prayer should not be recited in public schools, but then again in 1963 there were some people that said that forbidding recitation of prayer was not enough. This issue was brought to the Supreme Court in the case Abington vs. Schempp. There were four states, one of which was Pennsylvania, that required ten verses of the Bible to be read every morning, and then students had to recite

Public Schools should not implement school Uniforms By: Tan Ly

795 words - 3 pages Public schools should not implement school uniforms because uniforms are a false remedy for serious underlying issues in public schools, and children's homes. We are all born different; therefore, no two people are alike. The school's biggest argument is that brand name clothing is the cause of much and teasing, and creates discipline problems in our public schools. Many school officials also believe that clothes can be distracting to someone's

Smoking Should NOT Be Banned in Public Places

737 words - 3 pages deny service to these patrons. In modern society, the government knows better than to discriminate against minorities, senior citizens, or the physically handicapped; it does not hesitate, however, to discriminate against smokers. Personal choice is a simple principle that is highly valued in American society. Banning smoking in all public restaurants violates this principle and jeopardizes our freedom. Smoking should not be banned in all

Argumentative Essay: Women Should Not Be Allowed To Go Topless In Public

806 words - 3 pages Argumentative Essay: Should Women Be Allowed To Go Topless in Public      In the summer of 1996 Gwen Jacobs enjoyed a topless summer stroll during which she was seen by a local O.P.P officer, was apprehended and subsequently charged with indecent exposure. Gwen Jacobs pleaded not guilty in court and won the right to go topless in Ontario. This incident brought up an excellent question: should women be allowed to go topless on public

Why the Government and the public should NOT focus more energy and funds into bush/country areas- relating specefically to Australia

588 words - 2 pages The Government and the public population should not pay more attention to the bushToday is the age of self-determination. No longer does the bush need to be governed and protected by the city. The era of protectionism, where the bush was granted excess funding, and treated as a 'special needs' area is long gone. Now is the time to embrace the egalitarian ideal we so strongly recognise, to aim for equality between city and bush areas.The core

Filters Are Needed to Protect Children From the Internet

2056 words - 8 pages mandated in places such as public libraries.  Citizens' tax money is going to this institution so it would only seem right that the money went to bettering the system and protecting children from the obscene material on the Internet.  Tax-funding should not support hard-core pornography, gruesome violence and advocacy of racism and lawlessness. Libraries should meet their objectives without admitting to obscene content

Internet filtyers at libaries

889 words - 4 pages internet filters. The case against internet filters was based on four main points. The first was that the filters do not work because they both over block and under block. Secondly, the Children's Internet Protection Act is unconstitutional because it blocks legal information. Thirdly, libraries should not have to choose censorship in order to receive funding. Fourthly, CIPA abolishes local decision-making, since most libraries, funding is local

Similar Essays

The Government Should Not Censor Internet Pornography

2374 words - 9 pages highest level of free speech protection, the same given to books, newspapers, magazines, etc (Miner). They continued by stating that the Internet is not the same as radio and television, and should not be regulated as if it was (Miner). Through this decision, it is clear that the use of Internet filters to block Internet pornography would be an unconstitutional act, just as the Communications Decency Act was

We Should Not Censor Internet Pornography

1651 words - 7 pages their individual responsibility to buy the cheap software that prevents Internet users from logging onto sites that contain pornographic material. It is not Congress's place to say that all American children should not be exposed to pornography on the Internet and it's not Congress's place to play the role of a responsible parent. Only the couple who gave birth to a child knows what is best for that child, and ultimately, everyone is an individual

Pornography, Should It Be Illegal Or Not?

1058 words - 5 pages 1. IntroductionMy topic deals with the issue of whether or not all pornography should be illegal. I will defend the position that pornography should be kept legal by arguing, first, that pornography is beneficial to society, and secondly, that any position to make pornography illegal would go against the rights of the first amendment.2. ArgumentMy argument is that pornography is beneficial to society. Pornography: aids as a sexual outlet for

The Government Should Not Censor Pornography

3153 words - 13 pages worthiest of causes, the ends cannot always justify the means. As responsible citizens, we should endeavor to seek the best possible solution to our problems, while not going further than necessary. In the case of pornography, appeals for government censorship and regulation are big solutions to relatively small problems. To borrow a metaphor from rock musician Frank Zappa, such notions are "the equivalent of treating dandruff by decapitation" (268