The reaction to a majority vote in Quebec and their subsequent succession.
Quebec has struggled with a need to be maitres chez nous “masters of their own house” (Young, 1998). Many attempts at resolving Quebec's issues has resulted in tensions from both sides. Because Quebec has a strong national identity, and do not define themselves as strictly Canadian, Quebec is seen as difficult, unyielding and discontented. Quebec's separation perhaps is inedible and the future of Canada questionable. Canada without Quebec will bring about many complications and whether there is a rest of Canada (ROC) after Quebec a major challenge. Western alienation and the lack of representation in federal affairs will be a factor; moreover, past actions and historical events may have turned Canada into a time bomb, and the deterioration of the provinces the only sulotion. How First Ministers react to Quebec's sovereignty regarding economic factors, political structure, and constitutional issues will be of great importance. Whether emotional issues will play a major role in decision making is subjective; however, it is fair to say that it will be an emotionally charged event and it could either tear apart the ROC or fuse it together. Placing emphasis on investigating what keeps Canada together is perhaps the key to Canada's future, and salvaging a relationship with Quebec.
To decide what to do after Quebec separates, First Ministers and the ROC, must first look at why it happened. Perhaps Quebec's profound nationalism and unique national identity conflicted with citizens in the ROC; in order to gain understanding of their decision the ROC must look at Quebec's past. Quebec was not always treated fairly nor where they given many rights in regards to citizenship, education, and language they have always remember (as is stamped on the licence plates) the treatment they received as second class citizens. Certain events and revolutions allowed Quebec and others to gain what it is now established as equality for all, and because of these events many strong national bonds were formed. Attempts to sign Quebec to the constitution employed acknowledgements of Quebec as one of the two defining cultures that founded Canada. The French and English languages were made equal in amendments and during Prime Minister Lester Pearson's tenure he “. . . recommend what steps [could] be taken to develop the Canadian Confederation on the basis of an equal partnership between the two founding races, taking into account the contributions made by the other ethnic groups to the cultural enrichment of Canada, and the measures that should be taken to safeguard that contribution”(Guibernau, 2006, p.52).
With this basic understanding of cultural differences between French-Canadians and Anglo-Canadians we can start to see the reasoning behind the separatist movement. Countries and nations may have at one time or another found themselves trying to decipher who they are. Cultural and civic...