This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Question: "A Bilateral Free Trade Agreement Between The Usa And Australia Is Likely To Be Of Only Marginal Benefit To Australian Businesses." Evaluate This Statement.

2145 words - 9 pages

A Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between Australia and the United States of America (USA) appears to present a unique opportunity to advance the interests of Australian business. However, to what extent would free trade benefit Australia? An FTA superficially seems to offer significant benefits to Australia in terms of employment and the expansion of Australian business internationally. However, major market access barriers face Australian exporters, particularly in the agricultural sector. A free trade agreement would aim to correct any obstacles. Areas of Australian business would be pursued freely in the US market - services, manufacturing, investment, electronic commerce, telecommunications, intellectual property rights, and the movement of people. It is through these sectors that a bilateral free trade agreement presents positive and negative implications to Australian business.Australian businesses have had difficulties competing in the international marketplace. This can be linked to lack of diversification, domestic ineptness, expensive labour, deficient output and inferior management. The Business Council of Australia recognises that there are barriers to the competitiveness of large Australian firms due to the centralised, inflexible system of Industrial relations (Frenkel, Peetz, 1990). A study undertaken by the APEC Study Centre showed that an FTA could play an important role in attracting US investment into Australian businesses. An FTA would flow easily from layered security ties and would add, "A stronger economic dimension to the security and other links we share," (Howard, 2002) providing significant benefits in earnings.The emphasis on exporting unprocessed goods has lowered technology bases, discouraging technological innovation (Hamilton, 1989, p.27). However, increased access to US markets through an FTA could boost trade - enhancing Australian business opportunities. An FTA would encourage additional foreign investment between the United States and Australia, adding employment to the investment flows between the two countries. Bilateral trade treaties can increase international industry integration, triggering a synergy of increased economic security for involved nations. (Moskowitz, 1993, p.74). Therefore an FTA would result in business integration, chiefly in the information technology sector, increasing the efficiency and competitiveness of Australian business globally.Australia's exporting business emphasises primary produce such as wool, metals and agricultural products. Australia has a comparative advantage in primary products, although, according to Drake and Nieuwenhuysen (1988, p.17) this is also a drawback. Specialisation in such products is less profitable than secondary production or transformed manufacturers, but an FTA may improve a flagging business sector. When asked what benefits could be gained from free trade, US Trade Representative (USTR) Robert Zoellick (2002) highlighted that Australian business investment...

Find Another Essay On Question: "A bilateral free trade agreement between the USA and Australia is likely to be of only marginal benefit to Australian businesses." Evaluate this statement.

The WTO role in the Australia and US free trade agreement

1925 words - 8 pages into an FTA with the US would weaken trade and would encourage development of preferential arrangements in other East Asian countries. The completion of an Australia-United States free trade agreement is likely to diminish rather than expand Australian economic opportunity and this may weaken Australian business security. A bilateral free trade agreement between the US and Australia is likely to be of marginal or no benefit to Australian

Marketing of Honda motorcycles in the USA The North Americam Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)

2020 words - 8 pages apart from other trade agreements historically was that it was to be the first trade agreement entered into between two industrial countries and a developing country. By much of the world the NAFTA is often viewed upon as North America's answer to the European trading bloc. Many provisions of the NAFTA take their roots in the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement which became operational January 1, 1989. A target objective was to create free trade

Australia and Free trade

2571 words - 10 pages wealth of information available, as well as significant stipulated changes to barriers between the two countries, is discussed. While this this PTA may not be representative of all PTAs, it gives a good indication of how certain concessions affect the Australian economy.Figure 4 - Net exportsWith regards to the trade balance between Australia and the US, the agreement has resulted in a negative effect on the Australian economy. This is due to the

Free Trade Agreement

2785 words - 11 pages New Zealand's gains from a bilateral FTA. Finally, the paper will conclude that for achieving a successful FTA, any party should make "concessions" in opening up their markets and consider negotiation based on a long-term benefits.DiscussionInternational FTA ContextBefore we discuss the benefits from Free Trade Agreement (FTA), it is necessary to clarify the importance of international trade. International trade is defined as a "voluntary exchange

Free Trade Agreement (FTA)

1093 words - 4 pages FTA continuously increases, even though the WTO exists? First of all, the USA adhered a negative position in FTA, but after 90’ they come turned to positive position. After the USA changed their position they propelled free trade agreement contracting. The USA is the center country of the world economy so the changing their position is enough to call the ripple effect to other countries. The second, the WTO is the multilateral trade

'The Weimar Republic was a failure.' Evaluate the accuracy of this statement with reference to events and individuals

1245 words - 5 pages It would be wrong for the Weimar Republic to be deemed a total failure. Although the Republic did fail in its attempt to maintain a democratic government when the Nazi's came to power in 1933, it cannot be forgotten that the republic instilled a period of relative stability from 1924 to 1929. During this time the Weimar Republic was able to stabilise the economy, politics and international relations and it entered Germany into the League of

Consider and discuss the following statement: "In any organizational change it is inevitable that there will be 'winners' and 'losers'; conflict between individuals and groups is only to be expected."

2957 words - 12 pages conflict between individuals and groups only to be expected in any organizational change?" This question could be analyses by using unitarism and pluralism perspective. The pluralistic approach looks at conflict as well as co-operation, assuming a society with different values, interests and objectives. The unitary perspective ranges from authoritarian to paternalistic considering an integrated group of people.Since its significance in the 1980&acute

The Negative Effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement

1211 words - 5 pages hours to China. Increased investment and exports have created jobs and increased GDP. In 1998, Mexico's economy grew 4.5 percent and economists predict that it will grow an additional 2.5 percent in '99 (Harbrecht 35). Free trade under NAFTA has also encouraged international specialization, the production of only the goods that a particular economy can produce most efficiently. If the U.S. for example, is efficiently manufacturing cars and Mexico

The North American Free Trade Agreement

3714 words - 15 pages , this is held to be an absolute truth. Though free trade is undoubtedly the most effective form of commerce between countries from a purely economic standpoint, increasingly we find that our so-called "free trade agreements" are horribly unbalanced. Indicative of these fiascoes is the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). NAFTA is a lopsided and detrimental deal, hastily hammered out by an inexperienced group of American negotiators under

Central American Free Trade Agreement

782 words - 3 pages reimbursement with taxpayer money (to date over $13 billion) for "future lost profits" when domestic public safeguards limit profitabilityIn view of NAFTA's statistics, North America and Central America can only assume the same thing will happen when CAFTA takes effect. Central and North America will suffer as a result of CAFTA; only corporations who take advantage of Central America's cheap labor markets will gain. This agreement may advance the globalization process but little research has been done on CAFTA since trade negotiations started a year ago. The U.S. citizens should be aware that the government seems to be making "trade free" as opposed to making "trade fair."

Question: 'A free market system is the best way to organize the economy.' Do you agree with the statement? Explain your answer

879 words - 4 pages of decreased prices and cease production or suffer profit losses. From this example, we can see that, to have maximum efficiency and minimum wastage, a free market system is necessary.Another benefit of the free market is the fact that competition can exist, therefore producers will be obligated to maintain quality and keep prices down in the bid to attract more customers. As a result, consumers have the freedom of choice since quality and price

Similar Essays

Bilateral Agreement Australia And Us

1877 words - 8 pages ‘A bilateral free trade agreement between the USA and Australia is likely to be of only marginal benefit to Australian businesses.’ Evaluate this statement. The value of free trade is a contentious issue; the true virtue of free trade is providing greater freedom of choice to the consumer. However, a free trade agreement with the US would occur at the disadvantage of Australia's local interests, economic, political and cultural. In the long term

Implications And Issues Of The Australia Us Free Trade Agreement

3374 words - 13 pages '. However, many of the associated annexes to the text are yet to be agreed. The Agreement is not likely to come into force before 1 January 2005.Australia's first Free Trade Agreement (FTA) was concluded with New Zealand (ANZCER) - more than 20 years ago, with this "Closer Economic Relationship" delivering economic benefits to both countries. Then two FTAs have been concluded with Asian trading partners in 2003, namely Singapore (July) and Thailand

A Free Trade Agreement Between The Us And Europe

1745 words - 7 pages a main buyer. After a tariff reclassification in 1999, the Chilean price band system (PBS) resulted in higher customs duties of up to 64.41%, thus violating the limit set at 31.5%. As a result, this issue was submitted to the WTO . c) U.S and Europe A free-trade agreement between the United States and Europe has been elusive for years. However, with the recent election of President Barack Obama in 2012, European Leaders like Angela Merkel and

"Necessity Is The Mother Of Invention". Evaluate This Statement In Relation To Scientific And Technological Experimentation

4670 words - 19 pages this chosen topic. The analysis of the research topic The research question is "Necessity is the mother of invention. Evaluate this statement in relation to scientific and technological experimentation". The key words that show the content of the question are "Necessity is the mother of invention". The relationship of this question is to show the relation between necessity and invention that necessity is the cause of the invention or not. The