This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

R.V.Feeney Supreme Court Of Canada Hearing

3019 words - 12 pages

R.v. Feeney (1997) is a important case for the development of a Feeney warrant, which is needed for the police to enter a dwelling house. This ensures individuals have privacy at their homes from the police making forcible entries. When a suspect gets arrested and their privacy rights are infringed. The job of the courts are then to evaluate the case, and check if the appellants rights were indeed violated, if so was it because the protection of society outweigh the individual right to privacy. First, in this paper we will discuss important section numbers relating to the Feeney case which includes section 8, 10 (b), and section 24 (b). Than we will examine the ruling from the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the Feeney case and how this case has impacted police in their work and assuring individuals their right to privacy. After we will look at two other cases precedent to the Feeney case that includes R.v. Godoy (1999) and R.v. Gomboc (2010). Lastly, the personal analysis section will evaluate the decisions made from the three cases, identifying whether the judges have made the correct decisions.
Below are three section numbers you need to know from the Charter of Rights to understand the Feeney case.
• Section 8 everyone has the right to be secured against unreasonable search and seizure (Class Lecture, 2013).
• Section 10 (b) everyone has the right to arrest or detention to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right.
• Section 24 (2) evidence is obtained as a result, or during, a Charter breach and the evidence should be excluded if it would bring the criminal justice system into disrepute (Class Lecture, 2013).
The appeal for the appellant Michael Feeney went to the Supreme Court of Canada to determine whether an appeal for the appellant should be granted or overturned (R.v.Feeney,1997). The decision for the appeal at the Supreme Court came in a 5-4 spilt ruling by La Forest, Cory, Iacobucci, Major JJ and was delivered by Sopinka. In their decision the appeal of Mr. Feeney was granted, the court set aside the evidence and ordered a new trial. Sopinka determined the appellant’s rights under section 8 and section 10(b) were violated during the actual arrest and police investigation. Sopinka and his colleagues concluded the following first the entry into the dwelling house violated the appellants section 8 rights because the entry did not meet the common law and was not authorized by law . Second, even if the entry and search was authorized by law, however the common law set out in the cases of Landry, Supra, Eccles, and the entry cannot be justified under the Charter regulations.
Before the Charter was regulated the Landry Test was the guideline for warrantless searches. It was balancing between helping the police in their duty to protect society and the privacy interest of individual in their dwelling house (R.v.Feeney,1997). This test no longer applies because the test must be adjusted to the...

Find Another Essay On R.v.Feeney Supreme Court of Canada Hearing

Important Cases Of The Us Supreme Court

731 words - 3 pages Important Cases of the US Supreme Court The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the constitutional guarantees contained in amendments to the constitution. Among these Guaranteed rights are the freedoms of religion, speech, and press, along with the right of protection against illegal search and seizure, equal protection under the law, and the right to counsel. These rights all contained in the first amendment to the constitution are

Contempt of Court in Canada Essay

2368 words - 9 pages offence of contempt of court and narrow the scope of this paper. The second part will set out and explain the arguments in favour of, and against, codifying the law. Finally, the last part of the paper will set forth some proposals for reform. The Openness Principle Even before freedom of expression was enshrined in our constitution, the judiciary noted that the basic principle governing judicial proceedings in Canada was their openness

U.S. Supreme Court and the Impact of Sentencing

1753 words - 7 pages of legal council (due process) for those parole violation hearings where re-directed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1972 and 1973. The case decision is known as Gagnon vs Scarpelli (1973). The probationers? rights were addressed as follows: 1. To have documentation regarding the alleged violation 2. To have the right to alleged parole violations prior to parole hearing.3. A preliminary hearing to determine whether there is provable cause to hold a

Rosenberg, Epp, and Miranda: Implementation of Supreme Court Decisions

2979 words - 12 pages constraints which prevent courts from causing social change. First, “[t]he bounded nature of constitutional rights prevents courts from hearing or effectively acting on many significant social reform claims, and lessens the changes of popular mobilization” (Rosenberg 13). This restraint is caused by several factors. First, the Supreme Court does not get to issue a ruling on which ever issue it wants. A case must work its way through the system

A Brief History of the US Supreme Court

1044 words - 5 pages John Jay took his vows on October 19, 1789. John Rutledge took both pledges in open court on August 12, 1795. Oliver Ellsworth took both vows in open court at the sitting of the Supreme Court of the United States on March 8, 1796. John Marshall took his promises on February 4, 1801. Roger B. Taney took both promises of office on March 28, 1836. Salmon P. Pursue took both vows on December 15, 1864. Morrison R. Waite took both promises on

The Supreme Court case of Reno v. ACLU

549 words - 2 pages The Supreme Court case of Reno vs. ACLU was a pivotal case in American History. It took place in 1996, and was the Supreme Court's first case dealing with the issue of cyberspace. The case involves the Communications Decency Act (the CDA), which makes it against the law for minors to view "obscene or indecent" messages or images on the Internet.1 When the president signed the bill, the American Civil Liberties Union (the ACLU) filed a suit

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Supreme Court

765 words - 4 pages Court Invalidates..”) The Supreme Court decision was that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is no longer relevant since states do not judge based on voting discrimination since the Civil right Era. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. stated, “our country has changed” in a 5-4 court ruling. As the Supreme Court finds that the Congress has exceeds itself under the 15th amendment, which guarantees that voting rights cannot be denied based on race. As of

The Supreme Court Case of Roe vs. Wade

1819 words - 7 pages The Supreme Court Case of Roe vs. Wade In 1973 the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Roe V. Wade. Jane Roe was a single mother trying to raise one child on a limited income. She was living in Dallas Texas when she became pregnant with another child. There were no medical issues that would have prevented her from carrying this child to full term. The lack of income and already having a child was her deciding factor. In

The Supreme Court standard of obscenity evolution since 1950

1524 words - 7 pages has been an evolution of the whole idea over the years since the inception and the legalities behind it. The issue of obscenity was mostly associated with movies and visual productions that produced materials that were accessible to the public. The United States Supreme Court was at the forefront in handling the matter through the Supreme Court (Boyer, 2006, p.167). Free speech for movies was first heralded in 1952 where the motion pictures were

Supreme Court Cases on Separation of Church and State Clauses

2424 words - 10 pages connection between God and the good of civilization was destroyed. God is slowly being taken out of classrooms, ceremonies and even sporting events. The entities of Church and State have not been separated, but it does affect many. When debating the subject, it should not matter what religion you are, but how people’s rights are affected. Since the beginning of America, there have been multiple Supreme Court cases in which people, schools and

The Nomination Of William Rehnquist To The Supreme Court And The Power Of A Supreme Court Chief Justice

1102 words - 4 pages Established in Article III of the United States constitution, The U.S. Supreme Court is the only federal branch that is comprised of non-elected members. Justices are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of Congress. The court adjudicates cases that arise through U.S. Constitutional issues (as opposed to state issues), U.S. laws and treaties, interstate cases and cases where a state itself or the U.S. is a party in the case

Similar Essays

The Quasi Legislative Effect Of The Supreme Court Of Canada

2636 words - 11 pages The Quasi-Legislative Effect of the Supreme Court of Canada Daniele Zerbo 300119020 25 March 2014 INTRODUCTION The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982 symbolized a new era for Canada. Championed by Pierre Elliot Trudeau, the charter entrenched the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadian society, and allowed for those rights to be enforced by any individual should they be infringed upon. The enactment of the Charter of Rights and

Judicial Process Of The Supreme Court

1167 words - 5 pages Nature’s Judicial Process in the Supreme Court consists of decision-making; based on the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Although the Supreme Court has the capability to decide all extended cases; it also has the power to ascend under the Constitution, which allows the Supreme Court its jurisdiction in the Judicial Branch of government. The Judicial Process interpret the laws that are established in the Supreme Court; thus, allowing the

The Supreme Court Opinions Of Clarence Thomas

1805 words - 7 pages The Supreme Court has embraced its objective to assist the government in its framework and structuring through law as well as the interpretation of the law. However, plenty of their work has remained a mystery to the general public. Jeffrey Toobin enlightened the audience in The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court; however, most curious to me was the manner in which Jeffrey Toobin speculates that Justice Thomas, a Justice he has

Bias Of The Canadan Supreme Court

916 words - 4 pages Supreme Court AppointmentsSince most papers are owned by one company in Canada, I made sure I had an independent voice. "The Western Standard" and "Toronto Star" articles are very polar in their approach on the subject of the recent court appointments.The Star reports on the committee in parliament. The Western focuses on the subject of the judicial review committee. Both articles show the Conservative Party opinion that the appointment of