Ratification Of Constitution Essay

982 words - 4 pages

The Constitution has been operative since 1789 after the ratification of nine states (American Vision and Values, Page 52). Today many question the relevancy of a document 222 years old to our society. The Founders created a governmental framework, defining three branches and giving powers to the government and others to the states. It also guarantees the rights of the people. It took two and one-half years for the 13 colonies to ratify the Constitution. This ratification period was one of great debate and produced a series of essays complied into The Federalist. Authored by John Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay during the ratification debate in New York, they tried to get public support for the Constitution. Thus began the first defense of the Constitution and its original intent; which continued on when the US Supreme Court first convened on February 2, 1790. It was not until John Marshall of Virginia became the fourth Chief Justice in 1801 that the powers and role of the Court were clearly defined. Marshall took the Court from being the weakest branch to being one of the most powerful branches of government with its power to interpret the Constitution and laws passed by congress and the states.

Many conservatives follow the philosophy of originalism to interpret the Constitution by the “original” understanding of its words and ideas. This does not provide for a modern interpretation which changes with the times. The “Living” Constitution is an opposing philosophy in which the Constitution is an evolving document which is flexible to the needs and values of society as it evolves.

I agree with the philosophy of originalism and the belief that the Constitution is “fundamentally a rulebook for government” (Moore, Page 175). The Constitution gives specific power to the federal government in Section 8. Many would call this list of powers limited, but the Framers’ intention is clear to limit the federal government and allow the states to more closely govern the people – through the consent of the people. To further strengthen the rights of the people, The Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791. With only the first ten amendments, it is no accident that two amendments, 9 and 10, specifically define the Constitutions purpose to protect rights, given to the government from the people; and the powers of the government are “only those delegated to it by the Constitution on behalf of the people” (Spalding, Page 145).
Madison in Federalist No. 10 (Page 131) also supports the view of the Framers to have “great and aggregate interests being referred to the national, the local and particular to the State legislatures”. Madison expounds further in Federalist No. 39 (Page 135) about the constitutional limits of government to “certain enumerated objects only,” and the states being delegated the remaining “objects”. Federalism was created in the Constitution and while it seems a difficult concept U.S. Attorney General, Edwin...

Find Another Essay On Ratification of Constitution

Alexander Hamilton Essay

721 words - 3 pages diminutive part in the writing of the Constitution itself, he did heavily influence its ratification. In cooperation with James Madison and  John Jay, Hamilton wrote fifty one of eighty five essays under the joint title The Federalist “The Federalist Paper.” In the essays, he cunningly explained and defended the newly drafted Constitution prior to its approval. In 1788, at the New York Ratification Convention, two thirds of delegates opposed the

Constitution Essay

1512 words - 7 pages As 1787 continued, it was clear to most observers that the Articles of Confederation lacked the ability to govern the burgeoning America. After Shay’s Rebellion solidified this opinion in almost every colony, delegates took on the responsibility of revising the constitution. Observed in historical context, ratification of the Constitution as is, voting against ratification, or voting to ratify only upon amendment with a bill of rights, depends

The Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. by Charles A. Beard

1231 words - 5 pages Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the U.S.The Constitution of the United States is a document that I have studied many times throughout my schooling in historical context. I never thought that the Constitution could be studied as an economic document with the reasons for its ratification being based on the economic interests of those writing it instead of the beneficial interests of the entire country. Charles A. Beard's, An

Federalists VS Anti-Federalists

645 words - 3 pages The Struggle For The ConstitutionThe Ratification or Adoption of the Constitution took place between September of 1787 and July of 1788. The Federal Convention, which had drafted the Constitution between May and September 1787, had no authority to impose it on the American people. Nine states had to ratify the Constitution, in order for it to be in effect. However they were several problems in ratifying the constitution. The supporters of the

Articles of Confederation versus Constitution

1197 words - 5 pages Shearman's compromise led to the ratification of the United States constitution. The ratification required nine states approval entailed many hours of debate between the federalists and the anti-federalists. Anti-federalists felt that the constitution had granted many powers to the central government while depriving powers the states. They also argued that there was no bill of rights and too much power had been vested on the executive hence, they did

Constitution of the United States: Our Living Constitution

933 words - 4 pages brought more debate were,congressional representation, slavery, presidency, and federal courts. After many monthsand votes the details were finally settled and a committee was assigned in September toput the final results in and submit it to the people for ratification. They approved the texton the Constitution on September 15, and on September 17 all but three of the remainingdelegates signed.Before the Constitution could take effect it had to be

Making of the New Government

1727 words - 7 pages government (Schultz, p115). In this report, I will compare and contrast the Articles of Confederation with the new Constitution of 1787, analyze the drafting of the Constitution and how the states compromised to draft it effectively, compare and contrast the debate over the ratification between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, and evaluate the success of the Bill of Rights in achieving balance between national and states’ interests. The

Ratification Debate

1247 words - 5 pages Untitled The author of the Ratification Debates document is Edmund Pendleton, written in 1787. His intended audience is James Madison, as it says in the document that Pendleton's letter is addressed to Madison. The purpose of this whole document is to show to the delegates whether the new Constitution conforms to the republican principles of government. Pendleton's contribution to the ratification debate was to provide his

The New Science of Politics

1039 words - 4 pages , regulation of tariffs on imported goods, and regulation of currency. Almost no coercion on the part of the national government directly affected the colonists. Essential to the framework of the Constitution was the idea of dual federalism, which dictated that both the states and the federal government had dual sovereignty under the Constitution. In fact, the states ended up with a considerable amount of power retained after ratification. The

HOw did the Constitution set the precedent for the Civil War?

990 words - 4 pages Although the Constitution was very effective in its early years, the writers had made the mistake of leaving several important issues open and unresolved such as slavery, ratification, and the conflicts between the North and the South. The Constitution ultimately contributed to the failure of the union because of the issues that were not resolved, and therefore caused controversy in the years leading up to the Civil War. The document was

How the federalist and anti-federalist papers led to the ratification of the articles of confederation

1358 words - 5 pages In 1787, there was a controversy over whether there should be a ratification of the constitution or not. Many peoples opinion varied on the subject. The Federalists believed that the Articles of Confederation were a failure and that we needed to rewrite the constitution. The Anti-Federalists had a different opinion; they believed that we shouldn’t ratify the constitution.Shortly after the states sent the constitution to be ratified in late

Similar Essays

The Ratification Of The Us Constitution

669 words - 3 pages , for example, cannot impair the obligation of contracts, pass bills of attainder, nor enact ex post facto laws. On the contrary, the federal government gained in the supremacy clause, which gave the federal government broad powers to regulate commerce (Amar 123). The ratification of the constitution between 1787-1850 was the most significant event in the US history because it included the Bill of Rights; these are personal freedoms like freedom of

The Ratification Of The United States Constitution

1044 words - 4 pages During 1787 and 1788 there were quite a few debates over the ratification of the United States Constitution. The issues disputed are outlined and explored in the Federalist Papers, an assortment of letters and essays, often published under pseudonyms, which emerged in a variety of publications after the Constitution was presented to the public. Those who supported the Constitution were Federalists, and those who opposed were Anti-Federalists

Reasons The Articles Of Confederation Led To The Ratification Of The Constitution: Why Did The Articles Fail? Did The Constitution Solve The Problems?

942 words - 4 pages ; congressional pay was paid by the federal government, not states. America now had one executive president, amendment was agreed upon by three fourths of all states, the United States coined money as a nation instead of by individual states, taxes were laid and collected by Congress not by individual states, and ratification only needed the consent of nine states.For Americans to come up with and agree to the writing of and ratification of the Constitution

To What Extent Were Political, Economic, And Social Development Between The Revolutionary War And The Ratification Of The Constitution, A Reflection Of The Colonists' Dreams For Independence

646 words - 3 pages colonists' dreams begin to dim. The political, economic, and social development between the ending of the Revolutionary War and the ratification of the Constitution was not an accurate reflection of the colonists' dreams for independence.The colonists hoped that after the Revolutionary War and their separation from England, creating a functioning government would be smooth sailing. However, the creation of the Articles of Confederation made that