Rationalism And Empiricism Essay

1572 words - 6 pages

Rationalism and Empiricism

Rationalism and Empiricism are most likely the two most famous and intriguing schools of philosophy. The two schools deal specifically with epistemology, or, the origin of knowledge. Although not completely opposite, they are often considered so, and are seen as the "Jordan vs. Bird" of the philosophy world. The origins of rationalism and empiricism can be traced back to the 17th century, when many important advancements were made in scientific fields such as astronomy and mechanics. These advancements were most likely the basis for a sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? People wondered whether science was really giving us knowledge of reality. The quest for the answer to this question led to the development of these two schools of philosophy. Two of the most famous philosophers of epistemology are Rene Descartes and David Hume, the former being a rationalist, and the latter an empiricist. In this paper I will attempt to give an understanding of both rationalism and empiricism, show the ideas and contributions each of the men made to their respective schools, and hopefully give my personal reasoning why one is more true than the other.
Rationalism was developed by several important philosophers all around the 17th century. Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibnitz are all given credit for developing rationalism. Rationalism is the idea that reason and logic are the basis of knowledge. It says that knowledge is innate, and that it cannot come from sources such as the senses. Rationalists believe that we are all born with a means of obtaining truth and knowledge. Empiricism also came about in the 17th Century, mostly through the ideas of the philosophers Locke and Bacon. Although Hume wrote several decades after these two, he probably wrote the strongest arguments for empiricism, covering some questions not answered by Locke and Bacon. Empiricism says that all real knowledge is based on experience. It claims that people are born with no innate knowledge, and that everything that happens in the mind is a result of our perceptions.
Descartes begins his theory of knowledge by assuming that nothing exists. He trusts nothing, not what he has seen or heard, not anything that he has thought. After careful deliberation, he comes to the foundation of his proof: I think, therefore, I am. What he means by this is that he knows that he exists because he thinks. This of course cannot be disproved, because to do so, would require thinking. Descartes believed that in order to obtain knowledge, there must be some rational method for obtaining it, and that the use of senses, or any personal experience was not a reliable source. In his third meditation he says, "I know that even bodies are not…perceived by the senses, or by the faculty of imagination, but by the intellect alone" (Descartes 69). He believed that this was the same for every human, that we all have innate ideas in our soul. This...

Find Another Essay On Rationalism and Empiricism

Rationalism vs. Empiricism Essay

1570 words - 6 pages Rationalism and empiricism were two philosophical schools in the 17th and 18th centuries, that were expressing opposite views on some subjects, including knowledge. While the debate between the rationalist and empiricist schools did not have any relationship to the study of psychology at the time, it has contributed greatly to facilitating the possibility of establishing the discipline of Psychology. This essay will describe the empiricist and

Rationalism Vs Empiricism Essay

2210 words - 9 pages In this paper I will discuss the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They believe in rationalism or empiricism respectively. Rationalist believed that an important group of fundamental concepts are known intuitively through reason, opposite to experience. For rationalist, the knowledge is innate and that it can¡¯t come from sources such as the senses. They are well known as

Rationalism Vs Empiricism

2210 words - 9 pages In this paper I will discuss the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They believe in rationalism or empiricism respectively. Rationalist believed that an important group of fundamental concepts are known intuitively through reason, opposite to experience. For rationalist, the knowledge is innate and that it can¡¯t come from sources such as the senses. They are well known as

Question 1.

984 words - 4 pages Descartes’s meditations on the one side, and the Induction based Empiricism. In regard of answering the question, there are several optics to look trough. In terms of sensibility, it would seem that rationalism, being strongly based on deduction, is in fact the most sensible way of obtaining knowledge. However, it isn’t the most effective. Imagining a world basing its knowledge on strong skepticism would mean a world with very few scientific break troughs

Extreme Rationalism

882 words - 4 pages its world view and dismissed the new ideas as heresy. Hence there were two systems of thought which were incompatible with each other. This led to two major schools of philosophy, Rationalism and Empiricism. These pages are concerned with rationalism which was revived by Rene Descartes who was concerned to place knowledge on firmer foundations than religious explanations. He did not want the new way of thinking to

Of Mircacles

805 words - 3 pages in the senses. So, in essence we learn and know everything we do via our five senses: sight, hearing, taste, and touch. This was opposed to Rationalism, which stated that we, as humans, have innate knowledge and that we use reason to discover this. Rene Descartes is a famous rationalist, whose philosophy would come under attack from Hume. In order to truly understand the document “Of Miracles” one has to know a little bit about Empiricism


1401 words - 6 pages may call constructivism. His theory bridges the gap between rationalism and empiricism and proves that empiricists and rationalists each present a piece of the full puzzle. In order to truly understand Kant’s epistemology, one must first review and understand both empiricism and rationalism on an impartial basis. Empiricism Empiricists claim that genuine knowledge comes from experience: a posteriori knowledge. It can be difficult to argue

Framing the Innateness Hypothesis

1597 words - 6 pages Framing the Innateness Hypothesis Perhaps the most traditional way of framing the innateness hypothesis would be in terms of an opposition between rationalism and empiricism. This is an opposition that is frequently encountered in philosophical debates over language acquisition, with the one side arguing that language acquisition is a phenomenon associated with the maturation of a language faculty or "organ," while the other side argues

The main tenets of both rationalistic and empiricist epistemologies?

1469 words - 6 pages debate lies between rationalism and empiricism where it is questioned whether we acquire knowledge a priori or a posteriori. A priori knowledge is knowledge that we can have "prior to experience". One can acquire knowledge without the need of observations but through reason and empirical evidence (ex. all squares have four sides). A posteriori knowledge, on the other hand, is knowledge that can be acquired only after having certain experiences

The Christian Worldview

1456 words - 6 pages of Seeking Knowledge and Truth There are many ways to gain knowledge and truth. Some ways are without intentional thought where as others are intentional. Jackson (2009) describes seven ways to gain knowledge: superstition, intuition, authority, tenacity, rationalism, empiricism, and science. The first four are more apt to occur without intentional thought. Knowledge via superstition is neither reliable nor valid and is based on feelings

Kant as a Philosopher

1684 words - 7 pages widely held as one of the greatest modern philosophers of our time. Let us explore the schools of rationalism and empiricism and compare his views with that of other rationalists and empiricists (mainly Hume), and see where he ends up on the finish line towards the nature of human knowledge. The term rationalism is used to designate any mode of thought in which human reason holds the place of supreme truth. Knowledge in this school of thought

Similar Essays

Empiricism And Rationalism: Searching For God And Truth

890 words - 4 pages the world there are many streams of philosophy that have argued the existence of God, Platonism, naturalism, Aristotelianism, realism, empiricism, and rationalism they have even tried to convince nonbelievers about the defensibility and validity of God. But regardless of the findings it has always been an individual’s choice of what to believe and who to believe in. There has also been a perception about a greater power that has many searching

When Rationalism And Empiricism Collide: The Best Of Both Worlds

1346 words - 5 pages For a lengthy period of time, philosophers have been fiercely debating the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. Empiricism is the idea that knowledge can only be gained through obtaining facts via observation or experimentation, while rationalism is obtaining knowledge through logical reasoning . Though rationalism and empiricism are very viable methods of thought in philosophy on their

Comparing The Approaches Of Rationalism And Empiricism Towards A Theory Of Knowledge

1536 words - 6 pages Comparing the Approaches of Rationalism and Empiricism Towards a Theory of Knowledge Rationalism ----------- Rene Descartes was the main rationalist. He said he believed he had to doubt everything known to him to really understand knowledge. Rationalism first began in Ancient Greece with two extreme rationalists - Parmenides and Zeno. Rationalists believed in innate ideas - ones that are present at birth

Rationalism, Empiricism, Dialectic Materialism Essay

815 words - 3 pages Empiricism's definition is knowledge and truth are products of sensory experiences and not of purely mental operations. This word is derived from the Greek word empeiria, meaning "experience. With this definition we can conclude and knowledge of empiricism, we can conclude that empiricism consists of two statements: analytic statements and synthetic statements. Analytic statements are statements that attribute a property to something, and with