Rawl's Theory Of Justice Essay

1325 words - 5 pages

The phenomenon of adaptive preferences is describes as an individual having a desired goal but when they see themselves not being able to achieve the goal, they gradually start to lose their interest and desire for the goal. Since the goal becomes unattainable, the individual then tries to convince himself that the goal was not worth striving for. This phenomenon might be used to criticize some utilitarian theories because the theory does not satisfy the preferences of an individual and does not necessarily reduce the suffering; instead, the person lives his life pretending that the long desired goal was not worth it when deep down, they still want to attain the goal. But then if individuals were to set themselves attainable goals in which they have more of a realistic chance of achieving, then the person’s utility would not be unsatisfied. Other utilitarian theories’ goal is to maximize the utility and happiness of a person and the minimizes suffering. [160 words]

2. Government House utilitarianism is considered a less extreme form of Utilitarianism in which under this society, only a small number of the population would know that the correct moral theory to follow was Utilitarianism. Individuals under this form of society would then view rules and regulations as a good given by government officials. In this indirect form of utilitarianisms, they prefer to follow a structure that everyone shares the same two level moral view. I believe that an openly utilitarian government would best maximize its people’s welfare because under this form of government, the government would be a standard of rightness and not necessarily a decision procedure (30). I believe that an openly utilitarian government would best maximize people’s welfare because when viewing Utilitarianism under the equal consideration of interests (32), every individual is given equal consideration regarding interests and therefore, everyone’s life matters the equal. This would maximize people’s welfare because every individual would have the same amount of preferences and would treat everyone with equal consideration, whereas under a Government House form of utilitarianism, only a few individuals of the population know that utilitarianism was the most correct moral theory (31). In an openly utilitarian government, the idea would be to set a set standard for each individual’s interests and desires. In order to satisfy and maximize people’s welfare under a form of government is to treat them all the same and give each individual an equal consideration. People under this form of government would be the “most happy” because their interests and desires will be heard upon, but only the ones that will maximize the good will take part in government policy and actions. By giving people an equal consideration in society, this will indeed maximize the utility of the population. [295 words]

3. Rawls believes that the standard idea of equality of opportunity is “unstable” because it is not...

Find Another Essay On Rawl's Theory of Justice

Glaucon's Challenge and Plato's Theory of Justice in Plato's Republic

1939 words - 8 pages injustice is never more profitable to a person than justice and Thrasymachus withdraws from the argument, granting Plato’s response. Glaucon, however, is not satisfied and proposes a challenge to Plato to prove that justice is intrinsically valuable and that living a just life is always superior. This paper will explain Glaucon’s challenge to Plato regarding the value of justice, followed by Plato’s response in which he argues that his theory of

A Theory of Justice Presented by John Rawls

1820 words - 7 pages In A Theory of Justice John Rawls presents his argument for justice and inequality. Rawls theorizes that in the original position, a hypothetical state where people reason without bias, they would agree to live in a society based on two principles of justice (Rawls 1971, 4). These two principles of justice are named the first and second principles. The first is the equal rights and liberties principle. The second is a combination of the

Analysing John Rawls' Theory of Justice and its principles, and the conflicts which may arise from its implementation

1651 words - 7 pages Justice as FairnessThe late John Rawls, in 'Justice as Fairness', acknowledges that society exists for the "mutual benefit of all its members" (Nuttall 2002:223). They should be better off living in a society than not. However, he also indicates that there is a conflict of interest between members within the society, as each tries to accumulate a larger share of wealth and goods available.Rawls' theory of justice is seen as the solution to the


720 words - 3 pages My meeting with the two newly elected officials would begin by congratulating them on their new positions and informing them of the honor that has been bestowed upon them as my new city council members. I would then move into a discussion on the concept of social equity and inform them of their moral obligations as city council member to be fair, honest and equal. I would then spend time discussing Rawl's Theory of Justice and emphasis their

Ethics and Moral Development According to John Rawls and Victor Frankl

1300 words - 5 pages within a liberal society individuals are more prone to implore desirable ethics, thus resulting in an individual’s ability to make ethical decisions (Wenar, 2013). In Rawl's book, Theory of Justice, he provides guidance as it pertains to individual conduct, also referred to as Natural Duties. Among these duties are the following: 1) “Duty not to be cruel, 2) Duty not to injure or harm the innocent, 3) The duty to help one another

Philosphy Introductory to Ethics By Ken Burgess The essay contains three questions that the Professor asked and we had to discuss. Areas of interest that I discussed were Kant, Ayn Rand, Rawl

1512 words - 6 pages general. The breaking of promises, if not defended, will receive punishment. If broken promises are defended, however, then utility is maintained.Ethics of JusticeExplain Rawl's egalitarianism. Your response should discuss the original position, the basic rights principle and the difference principle. What would be Rawls's response.Egalitarianism holds the view that all persons have equal social, economic and political rights. Rawls' A Theory of

Hobbes Versus Rawles On The Fool

1991 words - 8 pages I Both Thomas Hobbes and John Rawls propose an idea of a social contract, for society. Hobbes' account gives us the Leviathan, and Rawls gives us his Theory of Justice. For Rawls a social contract is hypothetical, in other words people would agree to it if they were to choose it.1 He creates a thought experiment, to show what people would choose if they were to decide on a social contract. This exists in what he calls the "original

Capital Punishment

2213 words - 9 pages Coe's time finally came to an end; in fact, he was the first man ever to receive lethal injection in 40 years in Tennessee. Even before his execution, he neither showed remorse nor apologized to Cary's family. Indeed, this is a success story of justice, but it does not always seem to be a success. For example, in 1975, four years before Cary's murder, Coe was accused in Florida of raping and murdering Jim Marable's daughter, who was 19 at the time

Rawlsian Affirmative Action

4801 words - 19 pages if one were apply Rawl's method, against his own stricture, to the issue of compensatory justice. (4) In correspondence and in "A Puzzle About Economic Justice In Rawls' Theory," Social Theory and Practice, vol. 4 #1, pp. 1-27. (5) "A Puzzle About ..., " p. 3. (6) Ibid., p. 7. (7) Ibid., pp. 12-13. (8) Thomas Nagel, "The Policy of Preference," in Mortal Questions (London: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1979) pp.91-105.

Applied ethics - A public defender application

1958 words - 8 pages decision to make, leaving all her personal issues on hold. According to this theory, she should fight for Oliver's case to prove his innocence in order to fulfill her moral duty. She will likely lose a lot of important things to her at the expense of helping Oliver.John Rawls theory of Contractarianism.John Rawl's theory considers fairness to be the core element to an ethical society. Fairness is something everyone has known about since a very young

The Veracity of Restorative Justice Gaining Support in South Africa

1611 words - 6 pages value of healing; whereas the criminal justice system (traditional justice) usually used compensates the hurt of crime with the hurt of punishment. Traditional justice tends to focus more on the crime that has been committed whereas restorative justice places emphasis on the future. It is further seen as an application of the spiritual teaching of criminal justice as well as a theory of social justice. Moreover, it has also been stated that

Similar Essays

Justice As Fairness Versus The Principle Of Average Utility. On John Rawl's Statement

2418 words - 10 pages basic social institutions generally satisfy and are generally known to satisfy these principles." (Chapt.1 Pp.5) Rawls elaborates on this concept in his theory of justice and derives the two principles of justice as fairness, which will be examined later. For now I will examine what Rawls claims makes a given conception more just than another in the OP. Rawls holds that, "other things being equal, one conception of justice is preferable to another

Theory Of Justice Essay

668 words - 3 pages There has been much written on John Rawls’ Theory of Justice (1971). This is because the notion of justice is a contentious issue, particularly when one attempts to apply it to the global scale. This poses a question with no simple answer – can there be a universal theory of global justice in a world characterised by cultural, economic and political difference? Modern analytical philosophy stipulates that one can achieve definite answers, as it

John Rawls' A Theory Of Justice

705 words - 3 pages , and thus would have to, according to Rawls, subsidize the tennis player's decision not to work (as she would be in the great economic standing). Kymlicka calls this situation unreasonable, and states that Rawls needs to make his theory more "ambition-sensitive" to account for personal decisions. In cases like these, the worry is that individuals would lose ambition and their drive to succeed, as those who do had such characteristics would only end up supporting others. Overall, however, Kymlicka supports Rawl's principles of justice, sighting their utility in society, even if at time impracticality.

Community For Justice A Communitarian Critique Of Traditional Liberal Theory

1484 words - 6 pages related to genuine nations or societies. Traditional liberalist theory’s roots originate from the French revolution, a movement whose goals included community, in partnership with liberty, justice, and equality (Kymlica 2002, 208). However ideal the theory’s origins, the progression to today’s liberal theory has left the concept of community ignored. This would be unacceptable to original liberals, as modern liberalism compensates by using liberty and