Reaons To Abolish Nuclear Weapons Essay

1565 words - 6 pages

Albert Einstein once said, “The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save our modes of thinking and we thus drift toward unparalleled catastrophe” (Krieger 4). The debate over the moral and life threatening potential of nuclear weapons has been in question since the first bomb was detonated almost eight decades ago. Nuclear weapons seem rightly owned by the world’s superpowers in order to ensure protection, yet it is feared that nuclear weapons are the horrible remnant of the Cold War that may still potentially cause unilateral destruction. It has been proposed by several benevolent world powers, that nuclear weapons should be banned from the arsenal of all countries who own them, and any country that does not contain nuclear weapons should cease martial nuclear research immediately.
In banning nuclear weapons, one beneficial factor would be the elimination of the immense cost that comes with them. In 2008, over 52 billion dollars were allocated for nuclear research and development projects in the U.S. alone (Weeks). The cost to develop, experiment with and manage the waste of nuclear weapons is immense, and at times, it has been a major part of the monetary factor crippling the U.S. into budget. Nuclear weapons alone have cost the U.S. a fortune; the cost has been over 7.5 trillion dollars since the first nuke was made (Krieger 9). By putting a stop to the development of Nuclear weapons, the immense expense that comes with it will also become obsolete, and more resources can be imputed towards beneficial yet monitored energy research.

Perhaps the strongest benefit of banning nuclear weapons, no land in any country would ever become uninhabitable due to the devastation of a nuclear bomb. Radiation from a nuclear bomb’s detonation would have catastrophic effects on the area it is dropped in. Besides the fact that the explosion would totally obliterate anyone in the vicinity of “ground zero”, the explosive pressure of the blast would gruesomely injure anyone in the area, and this is not counting the fact that the debris from the blast would turn to deadly projectiles that c3ould kill on their own (Glasstone 541). Apart from the horribly gruesome burns one would receive in a blast, the radiation a person would be exposed to would also have horrible effects on humans and animals alike. The radiation would cause their entire body to basically malfunction, for most of their organs would suffer from hemorrhage and infection (Glasstone 651,616). Radiation could cause a person to transfer these disorders to their children by affecting their reproductive organs, or it could even end up damaging their brain and leaving them in a coma (Glasstone 617). In plants and fauna, radiation from a nuclear blast could destroy any crops, and those too far to be obliterated would be contaminated by the radiation which could be passed to anything that eats them (Glasstone 625). The soil and land in the vicinity of the blast would also be...

Find Another Essay On Reaons to Abolish Nuclear Weapons

How to control nuclear weapons from system maintainer's viewpoint: (Mearsheimer)

716 words - 3 pages The nature of the problem is that US security has been threatened by the theft of nuclear material and the creation of weapons that will be used by terrorists against the US. The terrorists are not a state, which is the prime actor in realist thought; nevertheless these terrorists are revisionists who challenge the hegemonic status of the US within the system by using the nuclear weapons to disable the US through the immediate and eventual

Shouls Every Country Have the Right to Possess of Nuclear Weapons?

1144 words - 5 pages radiation sickness and different types of cancers. Whilst the atomic bomb is considered as one of the greatest inventions of all time, in terms of how it could protect a nation, is it really worth having numerous amounts of governments on edge at the thought of a weapon so powerful? Ronald Reagan described nuclear weapons as: “Totally irrational, totally inhumane, good for nothing but killing, possibly leading to the destruction of life on Earth

To what extent has On War rendered nuclear weapons irrelevant - politics - essay

2945 words - 12 pages To what extent have nuclear weapons rendered On War irrelevant? Introduction Prussian general, Carl Von Clausewitz’s doctrine ‘On War’ was first published in 1832 and yet scholars today argue ‘Clausewitz’s theory of war is as timeless as the phenomenon of war’ (ref). Thus, despite the development of nuclear weaponry, Clausewitzian thought remains relevant and hence, timeless. However, 113 years after Clausewitz published his work came the first

A Proposal for the International Elimination of Nuclear Weapons

1729 words - 7 pages responsibilities following 2012. It also did not offer any form of verification. There is still the urgent need to abolish nuclear weapons in the present time. The majority of USA citizens agree that the USA should engage in a negotiated treaty to abolish nuclear weapons (Lake, Snell, & Wolf, 1997). The same case applies to majority of citizens in Europe who seek a nuclear-weapon-free-Europe (The Simons Foundation, 2007). There have also been

Nuclear Weapon Funding in US Defense Budget

2509 words - 10 pages Reduction in Nuclear Weapons, Web. May 2014). What took abroad from this budget is that there was a shortage of authority in trying to carry on the prioritization of the funding of the very issue, we are in retreat of this issue, and it’s a very bulky mistake. In fact the administration officials abolish the approach that the budget emulates a loss of affection on the issue. After all, President Obama spoke in his docket setting his 2009 visit to

The Discontinuation of Nuclear Weaponry Creation

2076 words - 9 pages As Thomas Jefferson once stated, “The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government”. Have political leaders thrown aside this advice in their pursuit of nuclear arms proliferation? Since 1945, many world leaders have established forms of defense known as nuclear weapons that have the technology and capability to completely annihilate designated regions of the earth. Originally a

Nuclear Deterrence: A Flawed Theory - English - Essay

2295 words - 10 pages states will need to consider acquiring their own independent means of deterrence, including their own nuclear weapons (Davis). A sole-purpose declaration is an interim step towards “no first use” by the International Commission of Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament. This attempt to semi-abolish nuclear weapons makes a bold stride in an attempt to delegitimization the use of nuclear weapons altogether. However, if not all nations come to the

War and Nuclear Weapons

1052 words - 5 pages . International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. N.D. Web. 3 Feb 2014 Theatomproject.org. The ATOM Project. 2014. Web. 6 Feb 2014 “The Manhattan Project.” ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association in Philadelphia, n.d. Web. 10 Feb 2014.

Nuclear Weapon testing

2834 words - 11 pages planet.As much as people want to completely abolish nuclear weapons around the world, we can't just dismantle all of them so easily. This kind of technology exists in this world, and they are mostly protected by the military so there won't be any accidental explosions.Due to the negative outcome these nuclear weapons have, they should not be used because it is costly, risks the health of the environment, and a threat to warfare. It costs money to

After The Atomic Bomb

2536 words - 10 pages resolved (1). The movement towards worldwide disarmament is now overwhelmingly strong. Many new organizations have been formed to try to totally abolish nuclear weapons ("Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Dangers" 1). Here are a few examples of a couple pro-disarmament organizations and programs: Association of French Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War Center for Nonproliferation Studies (Monterey Institute of International Studies) Coalition to

The Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

1524 words - 6 pages continues to the present day. The official nuclear countries, Russia, France, United States, United Kingdom and China have shown no plans of giving up their nuclear weapons, fueling proliferation by non-nuclear states. Although numerous non-nuclear countries have sought nuclear weapons, few are known to have succeeded. Those with nuclear weapons programs include India, Israel, North Korea, and Pakistan. There are fears that other countries such

Similar Essays

We Must Abolish Nuclear Weapons Essay

1799 words - 7 pages fear that if a terrorist gets nuclear weapons then we will be attacked starting a nuclear war in our country many more countries. So I want nuclear weapons abolish so we won’t destroy ourselves terrorist from getting their hands on these weapons of mass destruction and destroying civilization as we know it and to prevent. Works Cited "Nuclear Weapons." Current Issues: Macmillan Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 28 Mar. 2012. About Nuclear Power, Weapons, Waste and Contamination. Web. 30 Mar. 2012. .

This House Would Abolish Nuclear Weapons

731 words - 3 pages This House would Abolish Nuclear Weapons The abolishment of nuclear weapons has been an ongoing argument since the bombing of Hiroshima. Although this motion is strongly agreed on, not all countries have signed a worldwide treaty to ensure the use of nuclear weapons is prohibited. A nuclear weapon can be used to destroy a large are of space with an explosion that is larger than any other bomb on the planet. The splitting of two extremely

Nuclear Weapons A Possible End To Civilization

3011 words - 12 pages part of humanity and other forms of life” (Barbour, 200). This technology increases the power of one nation, or a small group of nations, over other nations and nature. Corruption, a shadow of power, lurks around the corner where power is present. With the advancement of nuclear weapons technology, the chances of a “master race” wanting to dominate the world is not far fetch. The possibility of a second Adolph Hitler is high, and this time

Nuclear Weapons And Their Importance To Modern Defense

1691 words - 7 pages Kim Jong-un, Ali Khameni, Vladimir Putin, These men are of different religions, different races, different nations, but they all share two key characteristics, they wield weapons capable of ungodly destruction, and they only understand force. Nuclear threats remain in the post-cold war world, and despite any moral quandary, the only action available to the United States is to maintain its nuclear arsenal and continue to rely on its policy of