This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Reason Why Death Penalty Should Be Implimented

885 words - 4 pages

One of the biggest issues here in the Philippines as of today is implementing death penalty due to the continuously increasing crime rate and many heinous crimes happening like the Janet Napoles pork barrel or the Ampatuan massacre. As of this time there is a rise of debate if the many lawmakers suggested to bring back death penalty as the capital punishment to lessen the crime rate and bring peace to the families of the victims of the crime, In my opinion death penalty is an inhumane way to punish the people who committed heinous crimes because it destroys the chance to reform and to rehabilitate them.

According to the Pro death penalty people, death penalty can lessen heinous crime rates such as rape and murder. However, there is no actual proof that death penalty can lessen crime rates. According to the Aleck pabico, during president’s Estrada’s term when the death penalty was still implemented, there is an increase of crime rate by 15.3% from 7,527 crimes in 1998 to 82,528 in 1999. In addition to that according to the organization Catholics Against Capital Punishment (CACP) “Most crimes are done out of misplace passion or under the influence of alcohol or drugs” which is true a lot people did crimes of impulsiveness, some humans tend to do things without thinking through in addition to that when a person is mad the decision is impaired and as for the drugs and alcohol, people who intake drugs or alcohol are not in their proper selves when the effects of alcohol and drugs is in their brain. So why bother implement the death penalty if there is no absolute proof that death penalty can lessen crime rates.

Death penalty is a way of rehabilitating criminals. However, it just destroys any chance for the criminals to reform. Because the criminals were already executed either by lethal injection or by electric chair before they have been given a chance to repent or change their lives for the better. How could a lifeless body be able to repent for their wrong doings? Tell me how! Does committing a crime is enough to end the life of a human being? No one has a right to take anyone’s life, because every human life is prices less and every life is precious, once it was taken away, it will never come back, us humans are not God to Everybody deserves a second chance, people makes mistake because we humans are not perfect and I strongly believe that people can change for the better with the help of proper guidance.

Lastly death penalty can satisfy the rights of the victim of...

Find Another Essay On reason why death penalty should be implimented

Should the Death Penalty be Abolished?

1097 words - 4 pages IntroductionThe death penalty is one of the most heated arguments in the United States. The main question asked is: Should the death penalty be abolished? This author thinks so.Human ErrorThere is always a possibility of error in sentencing death to an innocent person. In the last 30 years, 114 inmates on the death row were found to be innocent and released. A study from Columbia University by Professor James Liebman revealed some shocking results. "An

Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished in China

926 words - 4 pages The death penalty shouldn’t be abolished in China Death penalty is one of the oldest punishments in the world, it means end of criminal’s life by law. Nowadays, the issue of whether the death penalty should be abolished in China is still a controversial topic. Many people think death penalty is a bad way to punishment criminals because this method violates humanitarianism and it’s also a bit cruel. Besides, two of third countries

Should the Death Penalty be Reintroduced in South Africa?

1554 words - 7 pages does not warrant the abolition of the death penalty”. He further argues that in daily human activities, such as driving a car, air travel and war, there are deaths of innocent people. However those activities are not considered morally unjust, because their benefits far outweigh the disadvantages. Hence the same analogy can be used to justify why Capital punishment is moral. Con Death penalty: Death penalty goes against constitution and our morals

Persuasive Rhetoric: The Death Penalty Should be Abolished

640 words - 3 pages World blind." This means that someone killing someone else will not make it better it will just destroy the whole World. The death penalty should be illegal because it is a financial burden on the State, State-Sanctioned killing is morally wrong, and there could be a wrongful conviction which would be irreversible.The first reason why the death penalty should be illegal is because it is a financial burden on the State. This is a major deal because

“Should the death penalty be brought back in Australia?”

1881 words - 8 pages why Australia should not re-introduce capital punishment. This article is a limited source of information since it only discusses one innocent man that was executed in Australia. It is still useful however since it does show that capital punishment is not always judged correctly, executing innocent people. This article will be useful from my essay to debate whether the death penalty should or should not be brought back to Australia as it will

Should they death penalty be brought back into Australia?

1881 words - 8 pages why Australia should not re-introduce capital punishment. This article is a limited source of information since it only discusses one innocent man that was executed in Australia. It is still useful however since it does show that capital punishment is not always judged correctly, executing innocent people. This article will be useful from my essay to debate whether the death penalty should or should not be brought back to Australia as it will

Capital Punishment Essay - Should the Death Penalty be Abolished?

746 words - 3 pages parole only after a few years. But why should criminals be able to apply for parole or appeal their court cases numerous times or simply just enjoy prison life? Instead of the death penalty, convicted criminals should pay for their actions and not be able to enjoy special amenities such as televisions and outdoors recreation. They should be forced to do manual labor during the day. In my opinion, it is more devastating for the criminal

The Death Penalty Should be Abolished in America

1227 words - 5 pages who were fortunately pardoned by the governor of Illonis, George Ryan. The most saddening part is that the death penalty provides freedom to killers from actual punishment, lifelong imprisonment. It is widely assumed that all members of NATO are civilized countries. However the United States is the only member which still has not abolished the barbaric death penalty. As American we should be obligated to advocate the abolishment of the death penalty and thus become a true member of NATO, showing the world we are civilized and not barbaric.

The Death Penalty Should Be Enacted In Illinois

3103 words - 12 pages The Death Penalty Should Be Enacted In Illinois Due to the recent releases of newly exonerated Death Row inmates, individuals and organizations are calling for a moratorium- a cooling off period for state executions. The cases of just a few inmates makes it apparent that this would be a necessary step to save innocent lives. After 17

Should the death penalty be abolished all over the world?

408 words - 2 pages Death penalty is the kind of punishment that the crime or offence's life is executed. Over many years, the issue that whether the Governments all over the world should apply death penalty as the highest punishment still has been debated. Some argue that the capital punishment is one of the best ways to reduce the crime rate and allow justice to be done. However, it, in fact, is not. There is a wide range of factors against the death penalty

Paper on why the death penalty shouldn't be used

1360 words - 5 pages Against The Death PenaltyThose who favor the death penalty would argue that violent criminals whom have committed violent crimes deserve to be put to death and that they should die for their crimes. However, with some research one can see that putting criminals to death might not be the best solution after all. The death penalty has been a hot topic of debate for years now. It seems that everyone has an opinion on it one way or another. Some of

Similar Essays

Why The Death Penalty Should Be Terminated

3128 words - 13 pages reasonable doubt?" It has long been argued that an appropriate term of imprisonment should be the maximum available penalty for a violent offense. This argument has been supported by the fact that our legal system, though highly evolved and altogether expedient, is far from infallible, and in recognition of this the penalties imposed under it should be both reversible and humane. The imposition of the penalty of death should no longer be exercised in

The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

1608 words - 7 pages Maverick Criminologist” by Richard Rhodes, his study shows that the murder rates increased differently in disparate countries because the desire of taking revenge militated people and make them brutalise others (qtd. in Rosenberg 3). For that reason, capital warrant should be illegalized to advance deterrence and abate brutalization. In conclusion, the death penalty has a huge impact on people since it is remorseless and people see it as the

The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

1632 words - 7 pages interaction, being locked in a cube, something that anyone should experience? Or should they instead get a second change and not be treated like animals. This is yet another reason, why the death penalty should be eliminated. Works Cited “A Death by discrimination - the continuing role of race in capital cases”. amnesty.org. Amnesty International. 23 April 2003. Web. Mar. 22nd 2014. Bacon, John. “Washington Governor

The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

2233 words - 9 pages people should be sentenced to life imprisonment in order to be free from every man’s blood. Abolition of the death penalty will be beneficial to our society because: there is a risk of killing the innocent, the poor that cannot afford good lawyers will always be victims, racial prejudice is an issue in death sentencing, the cost of prosecuting death penalty is over whelming, death penalty cannot stop murderers and killing does not give chance for