Refuting The Claims In Adam Kolasinski’s The Secular Case Against Gay Marriage

908 words - 4 pages

Refuting the Claims in Adam Kolasinski’s The Secular Case Against Gay Marriage

Gay marriage has been one of the most controversial topics of the twenty first century and the topic has mainly circulated around such issues as procreation and marriage benefits. Although Adam Kolasinski, the author of “The Secular Case Against Gay Marriage,” never refers to homosexual behavior as “wrong,” he argues several key points, including financial issues, to conclude why homosexual marriage is not allowed in the majority of states. The author, with a degree in financial economics, will first of all already have a biased attitude towards any subject that promotes a better fiscal policy. Second of all, financial economics represents only one factor in the debate of gay marriage. This minute detail diminishes the author’s argument significantly since he is probably not extensively knowledgeable in the subject, even if some of his positions are legitimate. Kolasinski’s assertions and assumptions contain falsehoods and flaws, specifically concerning the overemphasis on procreation and the notion of sexual love.

Kolasinski begins his debate with the notion that “marriage is not a universal right.” He states that a majority of states ban many people from marrying one another – including first cousins, blood relatives, and people with venereal diseases. Although these statements hold true, the United States did not allow other “traditional” or “normal” marriages. For example, in the 1960’s, the government would not allow interracial marriages. This exemplifies how the government and the majority can sometimes be tyrannical or even wrong. Obviously, two heterosexuals of different races can marry without any government opposition. Although marriage is not a universal right as Kolasinski asserts, the reasons for a ban on some marriages have specific purposes. States ban the marriage of first cousins, blood relatives, and people with venereal diseases because they want to prevent genetic disorders and the spread of the venereal diseases. Although sterile blood relatives still cannot marry, this proves that tradition plays a larger role in our society than logic.

Kolasinski reasons that the government does not want to allow gay marriages because it would cost the government more money to grant them the normal benefits that heterosexual married couples receive. The return benefit from the heterosexual married couples comes in the form of procreation, which the author reiterates and emphasizes as a major part of his argument. Basically, since homosexuals cannot reproduce, the author, along with the government, sees no other incentive to allow gay marriages. Since every citizen has the right to protection from the government in terms of family decisions (including marital relationships), “there is no basis in the law for the assertion that the fundamental right to marry extends only to couples capable of biological procreation. The original statement that...

Find Another Essay On Refuting the Claims in Adam Kolasinski’s The Secular Case Against Gay Marriage

Gay Marriage Why It Should Be Legal, And The Arguments Against It

1597 words - 6 pages homosexuality, but the one thing that has not gained that much acceptance is gay marriage. Gay Marriage needs to be legal, for many reasons. Primarily, all people should have the same right to marriage in a society. Now, there are at least a million reasons why people would disagree with me, but only a few are going to be covered in this paper. In addition to the arguments against gay marriage, the reason "why gay marriage should be legalized" will

Arguments for and against gay marriage

600 words - 2 pages individuals are not able to legally wed and this abolishes their right to equality under the law.As many as three out of four individuals support gay rights this includes equal treatment and opportunity in the workplace and believe they should receive equal access to government benefits, equal protection of the law, etcetera. So why is it that more than half of the country opposes gay marriage? Although it varies from person to person it usually

A Critique of William J. Bennett's "Against Gay Marriage"

601 words - 2 pages William J. Bennett, a great spokesman for American conservatives, has powerfully argued as the title indicates in his article "Against Gay Marriage." One does not have to agree with Bennett to appreciate the strength and goodness of his mind. Still, although he raises serious objections to same-sex marriage, his argument overall reads more like an outline, lacking specifics and expert opinions, referring to only one organized, careful study, and

The Gay Marriage Debate

1708 words - 7 pages marriage should not be legalized. Some Christian groups for example, debate that same-sex relationships are against God’s will and it strays away from the purpose of human sexuality (Gay Marriage). They also argue that marriage in the Bible is defined as the union between a man and a woman not two men or two women. Two other commonly practiced religions, Judaism and Islam, share similar beliefs to the Christians: that it is an abomination and not

The Tragedy of Gay Marriage

2073 words - 8 pages Sam Schulman’s “The Worst Thing About Gay Marriage” presents an interesting argument against gay marriage that hinges upon maintaining a traditional form of marriage. He actually claims that gay marriage is “unnecessary”(381). According to Schulman, there are 4 primary effects of marriage within his definition he calls the kinship system. First, marriage protects and controls a woman’s sexuality. Second, the possible pairings are limited by the

The Debate Over Gay Marriage

2034 words - 8 pages conservative groups believe that if the government allows gay marriage to take place, it will usher such sins in as polygamy, bestiality, and incest. These are also a non-traditional relationship that goes against the foundation of marriage. They feel that this will damage future societies, causing the institute of marriage to weaken. In 2013 the supporters of polygamy made a plea to the courts trying to legalize polygamy, their reasoning was

The Legalizaiton of Gay Marriage

1195 words - 5 pages generation will pave the road for the awareness of this human rights issue. Aside from all religious aspects (as religion should be held alone with the separation of church and state), the case against same-gender marriage is simply that people are unfamiliar to it. Bigotry and prejudice still exist in our society, and traditionally people fear what is strange and unusual to them. However, this has never stopped society from evolving and changing

Gay Marriage and the Government

1678 words - 7 pages will give their cause some momentum in other states, and indeed state legislature- in New York and New Jersey- have recently considered measures that would make gay marriage legal. Opponents of same-sex marriage note that whenever voters have had an opportunity to weigh in on the issue-even in a more socially liberal state such as California – they almost always vote against gay marriage. These opponents hope continue placing constitutional bans

Gay Marriage in the USA: Tides of Change

1420 words - 6 pages human rights of marriage for all (Chan). It was in 1993 in Hawaii that “same sex marriage” reappeared, and it went to the top of the movement. In this case, it was because three same-sex couples filed a discrimination suit against the state of Hawaii for denying their marriage requests. There was not any reason to deny them the marriage license, and the State Supreme Court nearly legalized gay marriage. This would have made Hawaii the first

Persuasive essay, gay marriage in the us, YES!

1343 words - 5 pages to be allowed to get married. Why would they want to be married? Are they not happy with the relationship in which they have? And it is just like Scott Bidstrup (homosexual himself and author of several articles about gay lifestyle and rights) put it: Gays and lesbians are just like heterosexuals, they want their marriages to be recognized by the law. They are like any normal couple and want a marriage to prove and show their love for each other

The Effects of Gay Marriage on Families

1819 words - 7 pages comforting to gay Americans because now they know that the highest political leader in their country won't judge them based on their sexualtity. "May 2012: President Obama issues a statement saying that he thinks same­sex couples should be able to get married. A Gallup Poll released the same week reveals that 50% of Americans support gay marriage while 48% are against it," (Same­Sex Marriage Timeline 3). President Obama's opinion being

Similar Essays

The Case Against Passing A Law Or Bill That Would Allow Gay Marriage

1020 words - 4 pages bills is denying the misconceptions. Since the issue arose, people have come up with all sorts of scenarios and generalizations about the effects these laws would have on America. In his article, “Arizona Bill Does Not Give Businesses License to Discriminate Against Gays”, Napp Nazworth states that “Under current Arizona law, if a business wanted to discriminate against gays, they would not need this bill to be passed to do so.”(1), which shows that

Discrimination Against Gay Marriage Is The Voice Of Ignorance

1934 words - 8 pages Discrimination Against Gay Marriage is the Voice of Ignorance Marriage is one of the fundamental establishments of the United States. As a young person, one looks forward to many goals in their lifetime: career success, a good life, and very often marriage to the person they love and a family together. This is one of the biggest parts of our "American life" and culture. Very few heterosexuals would be willing to put their right to marry

What Are The Reasons For And Against Gay Marriage

2689 words - 11 pages their spouse if their partner becomes incapacitated. In the case of partner's death, the spouse receives any earned Social Security or veteran benefits. Other: Receiving crime victims' recovery benefits if the partner is the victim of a crime What are the reasons for and against gay marriage Inheriting a share of your spouse's estate Insurance breaks and family discount Receiving equitable division of property when divorced All these benefits

Critque Of "Against Gay Marriage" Essay

1597 words - 6 pages Andrew CarrollProf. WesleyEnglish 18510/2/14Critique of "Against Gay Marriage"In his essay "Against Gay Marriage," William Bennett, a great spokesman for conservatives and former Secretary of education under President Reagan, maintains his conservative stance that allowing same-sex couples to marry would have a harmful and lasting effect on our society's intrinsic values and, in his view, would stretch the "fragile" institution of marriage