This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Relativism Between Societies Essay

1338 words - 5 pages

The meta-ethical theory of relativism claims that there is no universal moral standard that can be used to evaluate the practices and beliefs of other cultures. For the relativist, 'true' only means 'true for my culture', while at the same time, what someone in another culture deems as true, regardless of the contrast, can be equally so (Williams 1976: 34). This means that the criterion for what is deemed acceptable for a given society, is reflective of the views of the prevailing culture. I disagree with this meta-ethical view. At first glance, the theory of relativism might appear as one of respect and tolerance, however, after closer analysis it leads to sharp division between different societies (Midgley 1993: 175), which in an increasingly integrated and globalised world, cannot really hold. A relativist division between cultures can only be managed if we don blinkers and ignore situations that through sound understanding are proven to be wrong. There are claims that are better than others, and if a moral claim is based on incorrect understanding, it should be challenged and shown to be problematic (Dawkins 2004: 17-22).

Relativism isn't inherently focused on consequences. It is a theory that stems from the fact of vast variation in ethical views that are found across humanity (Wong 1993: 443), which proponents of the theory have seen this fact as a source of strength for relativism. Furthermore, it has been claimed that from this, because different groups hold different moral claims, they should do so, because such divergence shows that there are no universal standards that regulate what is correct (Furrow 2005: 35). For the relativist, moral judgement is to be relegated to within one's own culture. Judgements outside of this sphere don't hold, as whatever we judge to be good or bad is only relative to one's own society, and irrational outside of it. Judgements within one's culture, however, are limited to that of holding society to the claims already established, and are not compatible with outright challenge to established values. Although relativism might appear as a theory of 'anything goes', this is not strictly the case. Within a society, moral codes may be very strict and demanding, and we should be careful not to confuse this with there not being any grounds for us to assess that the claims of other cultures are wrong.

There are several objections to relativism. Here I will consider two problems, which I see as highly troublesome for the theory. Firstly, the idea that actions in different cultures are equally right and beyond judgement by non-members of that culture. This is problematic. Just because there are different opinions on what is right does not necessarily mean that some opinions are not wrong, that some aren't better than others, or even objectively true (Furrow 2005: 36). Being a relativist would see one become a non-intervener in matters outside of one's own culture, regardless of how hideous an event would be...

Find Another Essay On Relativism between Societies

The Development Of Epistemic Relativism Versus Social Relativism

1598 words - 6 pages “epistemic relativism” and “social relativism".” Hyperreality is a term used to describe an inability of consciousness to distinguish reality from a simulation of reality, especially in technologically advanced post-modern societies. Umberto Eco explains this idea of hyperreality by relating it to the American culture that he explored during his travels. His travels of course lead him to the "absolutely fake cities," Disneyland and Disney World

Theory: Moral Relativism Essay

1910 words - 8 pages something makes it morally wrong. Cultural Relativism claims that what is morally right and wrong depends on the moral codes of certain cultures. In order for an individual to be moral, he must act in accord with the moral codes of the society to which he belongs. Even though there are great distinctions between these two theories, they both emphasize that moral standard cannot be determined without referring to some other frameworks. Since the rest of

Ethical Relativism and Cultural Relativism

797 words - 3 pages neither superior nor inferior to any another. The codes of individual cultures are just different and there is no standard or basis upon which to perform any type of comparison. Therefore, under both theories, the lack of standards across cultures implies that attempts to judge relative correctness or incorrectness between them cannot be justified. For Cultural Relativism, it is perfectly normal that something one culture sees as moral

Moral right and wrong are just a matter of opinion

1547 words - 6 pages oppressive of the minorities and makes debate between societies impossible. The essay question is not precise enough to decide which of the two relativism's it is talking about.The idea of relativism is summed up by Durkheim (1905), he suggests that 'the content of morality changes with the passing of time: each society has its own particular system which is never the same as that of another society. Nor is it possible to prove which set of morals is

moral relativism

645 words - 3 pages migrations to the United States to escape some of these "cultural norms" placed in these other countries and/or societies. To avoid ridicule and shame, many of these minorities have migrated to the land of the "FREE" bringing with them their own set of beliefs, morals, and standards to surviving in this new society. This statement holds true to the Ethical Relativism article. This article states that:Morality is relative to the norms of one's


774 words - 4 pages universality of moral truth. Cultural relativism also states that “different societies have different moral codes”, “there is no objective standard that can be used to judge one societal code better than another” and “the moral code of a society determines what is right within that society” etc. After James Rachels explains about the cultural relativism, he states that “when we analyze cultural relativism we find that it is not so plausible as it first

Cultural Relativism

1358 words - 5 pages There are an enormous amount of people in this world that we live in. All of these people belong to different cultures and societies. Each society has traits and customs that make it different from any other. Every society has their own way of looking at and dealing with certain situations. "Different societies have different moral codes" (Rachels 618). This claim is known as Cultural Relativism. "Cultural Relativism, as it has been called

meaning of moral absolutism

1246 words - 5 pages EXPLAIN THE MEANING OF MORAL ABSOLUTISMEveryone has different views on a situation; someone either has a relativist or absolute point view. In order to distinguish the difference between the two, it is important to define the two. Moral absolutism is when there is only one correct answer to every moral problem and situation. In an absolutists opinion something is always right or wrong regardless of the situation. In contrast, Moral relativism is

Christian Care vs. the 3 “Isms”

636 words - 3 pages . Individualism dismantles societies. Relativism is the belief that all ideas are relatively equal and that no objective truth exists. An example would be if a social worker and pastor both visited the same patient. The social worker might tell the person to look for inward strength through meditation. The pastor would proclaim “Thus saith the Lord,” and point the person outside themselves to Christ. A patient influenced by relativism would accept nor


1015 words - 4 pages is also the belief that one's ethic or group is the center of all importance which could also lead to passing of judgments about the other "inferior" group of cultures. Some of these judgments could be related to ethnic's language, behavior, traditional custom, and what that ethnic believes in. with this in mind, it would also lead to division of smaller groups within a culture because of such distinction between the groups.Cultural Relativism

What is Culture Relativism: Views by James Rachels

1237 words - 5 pages in this universe it cannot all be a mystery. Culture relativism conclusion is something cannot be right or wrong because it varies from culture to culture. Rachels says we cannot say there is no objective truth for the only reason that people disagree with it. We cannot jump to that conclusion, jumping to that is being naïve and not wanting to actually look for the truth or explore other ideas. Some societies might be wrong. Religion has been a

Similar Essays

Pojman's Views On The World Phil 207 G Research Paaper

280 words - 2 pages Louis Pojam argues for objectivism instead of relativism in morality even though we are attracted to the idea of relativism. Ethical relativism is made up of a diversity and dependency thesis. The diversity thesis is also known as cultural relativism and basically states that morality is different between different societies. What might be socially acceptable towards one society might be completely immoral to another society under the same act

Fourth Paper

1552 words - 7 pages normative relativism. I will wrap up the paper by summarizing why I believe normative relativism seems to be incorrect when applied to morally complex circumstances. There are three types of relativism as described by Richard Brandt in his paper Ethical Relativism. The first is descriptive relativism, which is actually a theory that simply states that there is a disagreement about morality between people (Brandt, 25). An example of descriptive

What Exactly Is Cultural Relativism In Metaethics? Is Cultural Relativism True? Can Cultural Relativists Uphold The Principle Of Cultural Tolerance?

2125 words - 9 pages if it were practiced, prevents Cultural Relativism to be true. Furthermore, I will explore the relationship between Cultural Relativism and the principle of cultural tolerance and ultimately conclude that no such philosophically significant connection exists.Cultural Relativists believe that different cultures have different moral codes. Cultural Relativists, therefore, argue that moral disagreements cannot be resolved rationally, as there is no

"What Exactly Is "Cultural Relativism" In Metaethics? Is Cultural Relatisim True? Can Cultural Relativists Uphold The Principle Of Cultural Tolerance?

2380 words - 10 pages societies' beliefs are to be deemed right by cultural relativism, what if it is in one culture's morals to criticize and not accept other cultures' beliefs, values, and principles? Hence we have the problem between the cultural relativism and the principle of cultural tolerance. For example, in future years Switzerland alters its history of being neutral, with popular support from all of its population became militaristic and developed plans to take