Religion And Science: A Metaphysical Approach To Evolution

1487 words - 6 pages

Public Schools in the United states can be a very touchy subject when trying to discuss what can and what cannot be learned, such as sexual education, teaching in Spanish for Latino based school, and of course evolution. Evolution in a biological sense is defined as the change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift (Cobb). So why is there a problem with this scientific statement? Children learn about the laws of gravity and matter, and there is no debate over that topic but, when considering what our children learn about the origins of life there is major disagreement. Whether biologists in schools are teaching children this as fact or theory can be an issue within itself, so, we must direct our attention to the idea if children are learning this as a basic scientific fundamental then shouldn’t we have to include other options like, Creationism and Intelligent Design? Can it even be possible to have both of these taught without making the situation in public schools more awkward and seeming confusing more than it already is for anxious teens and pre-teens? Each one of these theories holds ground in the American mentality in numerous ways, separation of church and state, morals, ethics, and about 50% of Americans has some sort of belief in god and divine intervention in terms of our beginning. So lets us address these questions by weighing the pros and cons of both sides and see if there is some sort of justification for one or the other or for both to be taught in schools.
Neo-Darwinian
Since the “Scopes Monkey trial” in 1925 evolution has been allowed to be taught in public institutions as biological theory. It is the frame work and foundation for modern scientific method when discussing where we came from and what started this change. As a theory itself it teaches a rational reductionalism thought - i.e. humans themselves can be broken down to something smaller and the more it is broken down the more we can see were the change occurs (mutation of cells) to show where we are now. Though somewhat blocked by its own limitations, Neo-Darwinian theory is no different than any other scientific rational and theory. Though to adopt such a belief one must look at what frame oneself must have in order to conceive this idea of evolution.
To say we evolved from a purely naturalistic way leaves no room for any justification elsewhere. We have, will, and can have only evolved from dead matter blocks out any form of supernaturalism or conscious matter. It is a purely uniformitarian way of scientific method (Griffin). With this in mind we can see that there are going to be many problems and advantages to teaching this sort of evolution frame of thought.
The advantages to this problem can help with the discipline of what one is learning (such as biology, physical anthropology, and maybe even geology) by giving you a foundation of thought that you are...

Find Another Essay On Religion and Science: A Metaphysical Approach to Evolution

Evolution Essays - Is There a Conspiracy to Suppress Creation Science?

591 words - 2 pages , conducted a computer search of 1,000 scientific and technical journals over a 3-year time period for articles having anything to do with creation scientists or their work. (2) Their search uncovered only 18 items, some of them critical of creation science, some news reports on the controversy, some letters to the editor. In other words, nothing that positively supported a scientific theory of creation.   Scott and Cole then surveyed 68

Science and Religion Essay

1272 words - 5 pages time and its reaction, and chance, which shows the probability of what may happen in any given time. Science is objective because of the need to provide facts and proof to a problem. It deals with the material world, that one can be said to know, through experimentations.ConflictWhen there is a thought of religion and science, one thinks of creationism and evolution as one of the most ongoing conflicts. It seems that the conflict of creationism

Science and Religion.

849 words - 3 pages created a gap between science and religion. While Christians are dedicated in their belief of God, Fynman states that scientists are "atheist at heart". The only way to try fill this gap, which will ultimately help both the scientific view and the religious view coincide together, is to first examine evolution and second try to find a medium between the two view points. Even though, science may prove many natural happenings, I believe everything

Science and Religion

1644 words - 7 pages Science and religion have always collided. Science is based on observation and what we can prove. Religion on the other hand makes arguments analytical in nature and requires faith. The basis though may not seem similar. A scientist might call this as the order in the universe or the Energy, which is transmitted in the world we live in. Religions like to look this ultimate reality as God. This entity is capable of setting an order in the

Argument Between Science and Religion

1961 words - 8 pages Why would educated, reasonable people believe in one side of an argument when the majority of the evidence points to the other? The argument between science and religion began with Charles Darwin publishing Origin of the Species, and since then, is still a conflict, because every individual questions: Where do people come from? Where does the earth come from? The universe? Not only Charles Darwin, but many scientist who followed Charles Darwin

Are Religion and Science One?

659 words - 3 pages the commonly held view that Science and Religion are entirely different and exist at the opposite ends of a spectrum.Science is based on observation. Religion on the other hand makes arguments analytical in nature (like the Ontological Argument by Anslem) and requires some unquestioned faith. In spite of leading us through somewhat different paths, both try to find the basic stuff2. The goal thus in both cases is to determine the constituents of

Faith In Religion And Science

1151 words - 5 pages these deaths were due to the diseases and not due to the treatment method. While this form of natural science clearly shows flaws when faith is applied to it, I do not believe that modern forms of nature sciences do so. The form of natural science that we have just witnessed had been created by a means of intuition – or faith, rather than with scientific methods, and thus receives the same status as religion would in the field of credibility. However

A More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

1628 words - 7 pages It’s Time for a More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation The debate about using animals for medical testing has been raging for years. The struggle always seems to be between extremist animal rights activists who believe that animals should never be used for research, and scientists who believe that any use of animals is acceptable. There are a growing number who argue that there must be a reasonable

"Understanding and Responding to Youth Gangs: A Juvenile Corrections Approach"

913 words - 4 pages "Understanding and Responding to Youth Gangs: A Juvenile Corrections Approach"Youth gangs are very attractive to youths in the inner-cities of America. These gangs are usually very corrupt and violent. What many people do not realize is that these gangs are having a large impact on not only the youth of America, but this country in general. A youth gang is a group of adolescents, primarily twelve to eighteen years old, whose members describe

Religion and Faith vs. Reason and Science

1039 words - 4 pages The general assumption with people is that science and religion, or faith and reason, are stuck in an infinite war against each other. Someone must choose to be a person of thought, reason, and science, or choose to embrace religion, scripture, and faith alone. If this is true, then someone who is with the Roman Catholic Church rejects science with all of its theories, and if one embraces science, then one rejects the Church and all of her

How did the Greeks use mythology as both a science and a religion?

790 words - 3 pages How did the Greeks use mythology as both a science and a religion? Use 3 examples.Since the beginning of mankind, humans have been inventing various explanations in order to explain the world around them. The Ancient Greeks, as Edith Hamilton points out, created some of the most complex and intricate stories of gods, goddesses, and monsters that justified many of the world's mysteries. They also fabricated their deity's in their own image (they

Similar Essays

Evolution: The Debate Of Science And Religion

843 words - 3 pages turn taken over belief. This has created a gap between science and religion. While Christians are dedicated in their belief of God, Fynman states that scientists are "atheist at heart". The only way to try fill this gap, which will ultimately help both the scientific view and the religious view coincide together, is to first examine evolution and second try to find a medium between the two view points. Even though, science may prove many natural

Science And Religion: A Christian's Response To Biology

2726 words - 11 pages Science and Religion: A Christian's Response to Biology Introduction In the beginning, God created...the earth and the heavens, or an evolving mass of matter, later to become the heavens and the earth? The conflict between science and religion is a hot topic in many intellectual circles today. One of the more controversial topics is creation versus evolution. How did the world get to where it is right now? How was creation initiated? Is

An Analytical Approach To Truth And Religion

6399 words - 26 pages possibilities and limitations which various kinds of studies of religion (science of religion, M. Müller) such as social sciences, philosophy of religion and theology of religion, have in determining the truth of religion. In the past the study of religion was used both to criticize and to defend a particular religion (usually Christianity). I do not however aim at providing arguments that a certain religion (e.g. Christianity) or religion in

Evolutionary Theory According To Science And Religion

1958 words - 8 pages the methodical study of the organisation and conduct of the natural and material world through experimental investigation and empirical observation. Whilst, religion was primarily concerned with spiritual and immaterial substance that cannot be empirically verified and therefore could not amount to knowledge in the same way science would; he recognised religion as a simple social construction which evolved overtime. As a result, he deemed those who