In the 1400, Europe was dominantly Christian, but also served as a home to many Muslims and Jews that inhabited the surrounding areas. Europe; however, was the site of the first major religious conflict. For more than 300 years countless religious crusades were waged by European Christians and Muslims. This conflict was termed at the “holy war.” Inevitably this war converted into conquest as each conflicting religion tried to prove superior.
America was discovered in the year 1492 by Christopher Columbus. After the founding of the “New World”- as it was termed centuries ago- this land served as a refuge, for countless immigrants, for religious freedom. A melting pot of these religions and the tolerance they were accompanied by in the establishment of America has transgressed over the year to where they stand today. However, in the early years of American History there wasn’t one, or even a few, definite religions. In Mississippi Culture, religion was primarily devoted to the worship of the sun, as it was deemed the creator of life and fertility (Grayling, 2007). Native American religion was founded on the conviction that nature was life, pulsating with “aura,” spiritual power. In the African continent, religion created culture. These “pre-civilized” religions had their similarities to many of the current religions i.e. belief in an afterlife, revelations as a source of acquired spiritual truth. Ironically these “pre-civilized” religions weren’t tolerated by the same immigrants who sought to escape religious persecutions from their homeland.
As proven, there was an abundance of religions that existed in history that weren’t extremely tolerant of each other. Religion tended to differ drastically and disagree on many levels. Up until the previous century, the concept of religion was based on “The one true religion,” (Halbert, 1996) from which beliefs you were to be saved or damned. Despite the continuing presence of religious bigotry and fanaticism in the world, the twentieth century has noticeably witnessed a growth in religious tolerance. In accordance, religious tolerance should not have any limitation for increased global interactions, understanding and correcting historical mistakes, and allow varying religions to coexist in similar regions.
Our global society won’t be content with the traditions of certain religions and, as a community at large, we could prevent these practices from ever occurring. However, if we attempt to block these traditions, it will ultimately encourage civil strife and create war or violent confrontation between separate religious factions. In recognition of these dangers, it is in the world’s interest to coexist with the religious practices and traditions of other belief philosophies; however, one may continue to disapprove.
The defenders of religious tolerance believe that the practical reasons are weak, since they rely on circumstances which can be easily altered. According to the defenders, “If the only basis...