As time has been going on violence has been a form of entertainment. Over time we as people have evolved and the form of entertainment has too. Television has become one of the most popular forms of entertainment. When you mix up some violence into television there is always an audience that will watch. To keep this audience watching you must add storylines and characters. The male soap opera of professional wrestling is born.
Professional wrestling is the form of entertain and sports mixed together to get sport-entertainment. Just like any other form of entertainment there needs to be a cast and story. The wrestlers are the cast and take they take the violent bumps and bruises. The stories they tell is the entertainment side of professional wrestling. In the world of professional wrestling anything is legal. The more the violent the more the crowd erupts. Slam a man on the mat not much a reaction. Put that man threw a table louder reaction. Thru that man off the top of 20 foot cage the crowd goes wild. The more violent the fans love it even more.
Violence, profanity, gratuity, and sex sells in our civilization. Professional wrestling capitalized on all those in its heyday. Those larger than life figures were characters an audience watch and wanted to be. They were told to eat there vitamins and say their prayers. They saw these professionals jump of ladders onto tables, and they tried to emulate what they had sawn. This same industry had an audience yelling “suck it.” This is the industry with so much influence. This same audience has had moments when they tried wrestling maneuvers and killed their “opponent”, most of the time the opponents were family or friends. In this study do viewers who watch pro wrestling have different values of violence and when it is appropriate to use violence?
The theory that I will be using is the cultivation theory. There is perception that of violence. The study will look at how professional wrestling frames violence. How the viewer will perceive the violence they are witnessing and how they take it into reality. To see what the viewer thinks about violence and when it is relatable to real world situation. This study will show the way violence is framed and how the viewers will perceive the violence of it.
We need to understand what violence is on television. The NTVS, acts of violence in the study were defined as follows: any overt depiction of a credible threat of physical force or the actual use of such force intended to physically harm an animate being or group of beings.” (Tamborini, 2005) “Violence was measured at the level of individual interactions, using protocols from the NTVS. A violent interaction was defined as an aggressive exchange that occurs when a unique perpetrator engages in a particular type of act against a unqiue target.” (Tamborini, 2005)
The storytelling also encourages and frames violence as a way to start a feud. The fued has to be set with good versus evil. In the professional...