While the political topics most often discussed in the media over the past several years have been about the economy and wars on terror, gun control is still a major issue that is still being debated in Washington. Some congressmen, usually of the liberal persuasion, advocate stricter gun laws that would limit the number of guns on the street and their availability to the public. Other congressmen, usually of the conservative variety, advocate more relaxed gun laws that would increase public access to guns. The arguments over whether or not gun laws should be written to constrict gun sales or enhance gun sales often leads to discussion of the constitution, not only because of its precedence over all other laws and the connotations of claiming a proposal is unconstitutional (and hence clearly un-American,) but because the second amendment exists to guarantee citizens the right to keep and bear arms. Debates over specifics on gun control are superfluous for one simple reason: everyone should have a gun.
The statement that everyone should have a gun may appear radical at first but can be justified with careful explanation of the following items. Firstly, everyone should not only have a gun but should be trained in how to use a gun properly. Secondly, everyone should not only have a gun but carry a gun with them publicly. Thirdly, the guns that everyone carries should have no limitations in strength beyond those that are required for safe operation. Fourthly, public protection is not adequately provided within the current system. While there are several other topics that could be discussed, the topics chosen demonstrate the argument.
The first consideration, that everyone be trained properly, would require educational reform, but would ensure that every citizen was on equal footing and would ensure safety. Many individuals who own a gun do not have the proper training to maintenance a gun, let along use it. At present most gun ownership is recreational in nature and few citizens are prepared for a potential attack (Cook). Courses in self-defense could either be required of individuals in the manner that drivers’ education is required from teenagers, or provided in school to all children; these courses would be essential to ensuring that each individual could maintain and operate their gun. By providing these educational courses at an early age, children could be instructed not only in how to use weapons as means of defense but also taught the meaning of their destructive power; most children do not accept their own fragility and this perception is often the cause of their accidents (Benthin 158).
The second consideration, that everyone should carry their gun, is especially important. The U.S. Constitution guarantees that citizens may bear arms yet many gun owners leave weapons at home or within their vehicles. The purpose of owning a gun as a means of self-defense is to provide protection to the owner in case of an emergency. While traffic...