Research On Jury Bias Essay

1540 words - 7 pages

Jury Bias
With jury bias we examined that the perspective taking, victim impact statements and race of the victim had no main effects with ps > 0.26 and no significant interactions either with ps > 0.64.
Jury Race
The race of the jury was divided into white and non-white participants. An ANOVA was then run with perspective taking, victim impact statements, and race of the victim as the between-participants factors to test against empathy felt for the defendant, for the victim, for the victim’s significant others.
White participants. We observed that there was a main effect with the race of the jury and the empathy felt by the jury for the victim. The empathy felt by the jury for the white ...view middle of the document...

102, SD =0.236) while it was much lower when the victim impact statements were of low emotionality (M=3.321, SD = 0.242)
Other Variables: Gender and Political Affiliation
Lastly, we examined the effects of the participant’s gender and political attitudes. Each factor was treated as a fourth independent variable in an ANOVA.
There were no main effects but a significant interaction was observed between the independent variables being jury gender, the race of the victim, perspective taking and victim impact statements and the dependent variable being the empathy for the defendant with F(1,107) = 6.879, p = 0.010. This demonstrates that the participant felt the highest empathy when the perspective taking was neutral, the victim impact statement had high emotionality, and the race of the victim was white and the jury’s gender female (M=3.571, SD = 0.655). Another significant interaction between the victim impact statement, the gender of the jury and the empathy for the victim was observed with F(1, 44) = 6.411, p = 0.015.
No significant two-way or three-way interactions between jury bias and the independent variables being political affiliation, the race of the victim, perspective taking and victim impact statements were observed with p > 0.06. No main effects were observed with political affiliation and the jury bias with p > 0.23.
General Discussion
The present research aimed to determine the effects of perspective taking with the defendant, the emotionality of victim impact statements and the race of the victim had on juror decisions. In the study, we observed that while perspective taking had no effect whatsoever on the jury decisions, race of the victim and victim impact statements significantly affected jury’s empathy.
Past research has shown that when participants think about the other person’s thoughts and/or feelings, they tend to feel more compassion and concern (Batson, Eklund, Chermok, Hoyt, & Ortiz, 2007; Batson, et al., 1997). The perspective-taking prime consistent with past research (Alexander & Paris, 2013) was imagine-other focused perspective taking (example: “I understand the defendant’s perspective”) but failed to influence the jury decision-making or empathy.
Possible area for future research could be imagine-self perspective taking. Past research has shown that when participants think about how they would personally feel in a situation, then they tend to feel more self-awareness, experience more personal distress, and may even have an increased sense of morality (Batson, et al., 1997; Batson, et al., 2003). Previous work has also shown that the two forms of perspective taking elicited different amount of personal distress (Batson, Early et al., 1997) and different types of cognitions (Davis et al., 2004), and evidence from neuroimaging studies provide further evidence of their distinguishableness in terms of neural activity (Jackson, Brunet, Melzoff & Decety, 2006).
Future research could consider a different formatting for...

Find Another Essay On Research on Jury Bias

Trial by Jury and Alternatives to It

4174 words - 17 pages , disqualified or excused as of right, 15% either failed to attend on the day or their summonses were returned as 'undelivered' and 38% were excused. This said juries still form a more representative sample of the community than do Magistrates or the Judiciary, which are largely white and come from Middle class backgrounds. This is not to say that I am accusing either of the above of bias, but it could be said that a jury

Discuss whether trial by jury should be abolished in the English legal system? Critically analyse the advantages and disadvantages of the system

2010 words - 8 pages to mode of trial.Sander v United Kingdom A judge's decision to deal with an allegation of racial bias in a jury trying an Asian defendant by means of a redirection rather than a discharge did, in the circumstances, constitute an infringement of the right to a fair trial as guaranteed by article 6.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The ECHR held by four votes to three that allegations contained in a note which a juror had transmitted

Runaway Jury: Depiction of Jury Tampering and Jury Sequestering

1062 words - 4 pages Summary The movie Runaway Jury starts with a shooting in a business office. The movie then continues to people receiving jury summons and people taking pictures of them. It goes on to show Rankin Fitch and the defense committing electronic surveillance during the jury selections. This movie shows how Fitch and the defense attempt to influence the jury to vote for the defense. The movie continuously shows a person by the name of “Marlee” who

Jury System Essay: Whether or Not Jury Systems Should Be Used in Australia - legal studies - Essay

1019 words - 5 pages inconvenient, unrepresentative and an expensive system that should be abolished. The fundamentals of the jury system will be researched, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of having a jury to determine whether this statement is correct. As Section 80 of the Australian Constitution states, The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth shall be by jury, and every such trial shall be held in the State where the

special needs prisoner

1400 words - 6 pages TRIAL 1The Process of a Trial by Jury<Your Name><Your School><Course Title><Instructor's Name>January 20, 2013AbstractA trial by jury is a fundamental part of the United States Constitutional justice process. It both establishes and upholds the rights of the accused, and seeks to determine the truth in the matter of guilt or innocence. Ideally this is done both correctly and without bias, however this ideal state cannot

In-group and Out-group Bias

621 words - 3 pages perceivers are motivated and able to correct for the activated stereotypes thus playing an important role in decision-making (Scott, 2005). Racial Bias in jury outcomes may also have its roots in Empathy. A study of jury verdicts in capital cases in southern states before capital sentencing was temporarily suspended in 1972, indicated that the race of the defendant had a direct impact on the sentences handed down in capital punishment cases

The Process of Choosing Jurors and Their Role

1250 words - 5 pages . In civil cases, the jury decide if the claimant has proved their case and the amount of damages (compensation). Nevertheless, it is a right in only four types of civil case, which are: defamation over £10,000, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment and fraud. In other civil cases it is discretionary. To be on a jury you need to qualify. To qualify for jury service a person must be aged between 18 and 70

Psychology of the Courtroom

2505 words - 10 pages psychology and apply them to jury settings. Conformity within Juries. What happens when a jury can not decide on a verdict? One possible process that may occur is the process of conformity, whereby the individual(s) who are not agreeing with the majority are coerced into agreeing through this group process. One of the most influential pieces of research into conformity was conducted by Asch (1956). In this study

The Jury and Its Role in the Courts of Trial

2023 words - 8 pages The jury plays a crucial role in the courts of trial. They are an integral part in the Australian justice system. The jury system brings ordinary people into the courts everyday to judge whether a case is guilty or innocent. The role of the jury varies, depending on the different cases. In Australia, the court is ran by an adversary system. In this system “..individual litigants play a central part, initiating court action and largely

Crime Scene Investigation

1773 words - 7 pages percent of prosecutors in Maricopa County, “believed they had at least one trial which resulted in either an acquittal or hung jury when forensic evidence was not available to corroborate testimony that should have been sufficient by itself to sustain a conviction” (CSI, 2005). This research demonstrates that the false expectation of plentiful scientific evidence can create a bias in the jury that can heavily influence their decision to convict a

What Effects Does Social Pressure Have On Jury Decisions?

833 words - 4 pages difficult to research what really goes in jury deliberation, as no one is allowed to witness or record what goes on between those twelve people. This is where mock and shadow juries come in handy.A mock jury is a group of twelve people who are shown a video of a crime or given evidence, usually in written form, who then have to decide upon a verdict.A shadow jury is when the twelve participants sit in the public gallery while an actual court case

Similar Essays

To What Extent Does Random Selection Of Jury Members Create Bias And Would Jury Selection Provide A Solution?

1556 words - 6 pages To what extent does random selection of jury members create bias and would jury selection provide a solution? The theory behind the UK system of random selection is based on many assumptions. Firstly that randomness produces a representative sample of the population, which will provide verdicts, representative of the general public. It is assumed that if one juror has an apparent prejudice, then those in other jurors

A Dilemma Of The Jury Selection Process?

1875 words - 8 pages race and gender. Although attorneys see hidden bias among jurors, they will not filter out the biased jurors but, instead, let them stay if these biases favor the lawyer's client. According to Melilli, 52 percent of the uses of peremptory challenge are based on stereotypes (Hoffman861). When lawyers decide if jurors are competent or not, they do not base their decisions on their own personal preferences. Also, lawyers hire jury consultants and run

The Jury Selection Procedure In The English Legal System

1718 words - 7 pages philosophies. The independence of the jury from the judge was established in Bushell’s case (1670). A judge’s role is ‘master of law’. He is responsible for interpreting the law in the case, enforcing the law, deciding the sentence and passing it, guiding the jury and avoiding bias at all costs. Whereas, the jury is ‘master of fact’ and is the sole decider of innocence or guilt. A judge is forbidden from participating in

Advantages Of Jury Trials In The Canadian Justice System

2082 words - 8 pages ensures that there is no bias among the jurors or purposeful misrepresentation of ethnic groups. This fact has been affirmed by extensive research conducted by many organizations. The Law reforms commission of Canada addressed the jury selection process in its 1980 working paper The Jury in Criminal trials, and its 1982 Report, The jury. The Commissions basic conclusion was that no drastic revision of the process was called for (Granger, 153). "[T