The Standrof Prison Experiment Essay

588 words - 3 pages

The Stanford Prison experiment studied institutional power in directing normal and healthy college student volunteers. Playing a random role of been prisoners and guards where they behaved as differently as their behavioral tendency. Thus, showing a system power, which, creates an influential social situation that affects the behavior of all the people that are within its behavioral context.
A college student was arrested and convicted of a felony. During the arrest he was informed of his Miranda rights. He was later booked in the city jail. They blindfolded him and was taken to Stanford County Prison, where he was issued an ID number (Prisoner 8612) showing in both side of his smock-type uniform. Other eight college students were also arrested. The prisoner’s identity was anonymous and they saw the prisoners as worthless numbers. The guards established their arbitrary rules, which should not be questioned or the prisoners privileges where taken. In the beginning the privileges included reading, writing, and speaking with inmates. If there was any protest they would loos privileges of eating and sleeping. If inmates fail to obey they were punished having to do excessive exercise. The treatment was getting more abusive such abused included sexual humiliation. Although some guards behaved differently some were cruel and others where good guards. Five prisoners where released because of stress related symptoms and a psychosomatic rash. Both prisoners and guards were chosen at random. Using psychological test and interviews all volunteers where judge as normal-average on all measures. In the mock prison experiment, there where no systemic differences between the ordinary college males who were playing different roles as the prisoners or guards. At the end of the experiment there were no similarities between the two roles. Students...

Find Another Essay On The Standrof Prison Experiment

Summary of Stanley Milgram's Prison Experiment and "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism" by Marianne Szegedy-Maszak.

778 words - 3 pages residing in “normal” people,” (Szegedy-Maszak p. 174). The first experiment, conducted by Stanford psychologist Philip Zimbardo, attempted to mimic a real life prison scenario with students impersonating actual guards and prisoners. Surprisingly, the results were analogous to the actual events that took place at Abu Ghraib prison. The second experiment, created by Stanley Milgram, studied some people’s willingness to follow

Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: a Lesson in the Power of Situation Critique

893 words - 4 pages PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Running head: ARTICLE CRITIQUEArticle Critique Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: a Lesson in the Power of Situation January 17, 2012This is a critique of an article published in Chronicle of Higher Education, (v53 n30 pB6 Mar. 30, 2007) on "Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: a Lesson in the Power of Situation" by Philip G. Zimbardo. This article discusses issues related to how good people can turn

Crossing The Line Question Posed By Instructor: Describe how The Stanford Prison Experiment relates to an event in history.

1406 words - 6 pages in action. So what would people who had undergone stringent psychological evaluations and testing be doing torturing people in the most inhumane ways imaginable? Was it just a few bad apples, or could it be something more? We can get a better understanding of what happened at Abu Ghraib by taking a closer look at The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Dr. Philip Zimbardo in 1971. In this experiment a group of young men answered an ad in a

Punishment in the Milgram Obedience Experiment

810 words - 3 pages teacher by pressing one of four buttons that lit up numbers for the teacher to see. The teachers were asked to shock the learner when questions were answered incorrectly stepping up the voltage for each wrong answer. The only real shock was a single 45-volt shock given to each teacher. This was to let the teachers see how the shocks would feel. (Milgram’s Experiment on Obedience to Authority) The Stanford Prison experiment was began in the summer of

Critique Final

646 words - 3 pages Adriana Szeltner23 September 2014W1 W131Critique Final"The Stanford Prison Experiment" by Philip G. Zimbardo raises troubling questions about the ability of individuals to exist repressive or obedient roles, if the social setting requires these roles. Philip G. Zimbardo, professor of psychology at Stanford University, began researching how prisoners and guards assume submissive and authoritarian roles. Considering the riots and outbreaks that

Critique of Psychological Experiments and Subjects

2118 words - 8 pages Stanford Prison Experiment" by making a significant approach to understand human behavior base on authoritarian situation in a prison environment. However, he made several mistakes by oversimplying many aspects of his experiment. Therefore his conclusion is invalid.The primarily goal in undertaking the mock prison experiment was "to study the effects of imprisonment upon volunteer research" (Zimbardo, 345). Zimbardo wanted to learn how prisoners

Stanford Prison Experiment

772 words - 4 pages Gandhi once said “Our thoughts become our words, our words become our actions, our actions become our character, our character becomes our destiny.” That very quote was proven in the 1973 Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip Zimbardo. Zimbardo placed an ad in the newspaper asking for young males to par take in his experiment with in return getting paid $15 a day. Out of 75 volunteers 24 were chosen as participants. Zimbardo randomly

The Stanford Prision Experiment

768 words - 3 pages Philip Zimbardo, a world-renowned psychologist at Sanford University, conducted the landmark psychological study known as ?The Stanford Prison Experiment?. Performed in the summer of 1973, the experiment set out to study the human response to captivity, in particular, to the real world circumstances of prison life. Volunteers played the roles of guards and prisoners, and lived in a mock prison. However, the quickly took a turn in the wrong

Reviewing Zimbardo’s Experiment

949 words - 4 pages “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo was written to explain the results of the Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo while trying to gain support for his conclusions of the experiment, demonstrated many errors in his writing, and in his own experiment. The errors that Zimbardo commits call into question the validity of his argument, and the experiment. The goal explained by Zimbardo was “to understand more about the process by

Article Review

904 words - 4 pages Philip George Zimbardo is an American psychologist whose most famous work is the prison study, “Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison”, in 1973. This experiment has had an exceptional change in social psychology. In this experiment Zimbardo, Banks, and Haney set out to create a mock prison in order to record and analyze the environment on a person’s overall social behavior as well as how the sample would react socially to being guards or


1017 words - 5 pages of view is questionable in many aspects (BPS, 2009). As aforementioned the main intention with Milgrams experiments was to explore the concept of obedience and its relation to authorities when tested (Zimbardo, 2007). Another famous experiment conducted with a similar purpose was Zimbardos, Stanford Prison experiment (Svensson, 2012). The purpose of the experiment was to study how people behave in captivity and how social roles affect one's

Similar Essays

The Ethics Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

941 words - 4 pages When put into the position of complete authority over others people will show their true colors. I think that most people would like to think that they would be fair, ethical superiors. I know I would, but learning about the Stanford Prison Experiment has made me question what would really happen if I was there. Would I be the submissive prisoner, the sadistic guard, or would I stay true to myself? As Phillip Zimbardo gave the guards their

The Implications Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

1115 words - 4 pages The Implications of the Stanford Prison Experiment In 1971 Dr Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment in the basement of Stanford University. This involved imprisoning nine volunteers in a mock up of Stanford prison, which was policed by nine guards (more volunteers). These guards had complete control over the prisoners. They could do anything to the prisoners, but use physical violence. The subjects were all students

The Stanford Prison Experiment: Philip Zimbardo

1937 words - 8 pages nailed to the floor and a metal toilet which is also nailed to the floor. They close the metal bars behind you and it’s loud. Then all you can hear are the chains of your neighbors. All of this, and you're innocent. These are the events that happened to twenty four college males who participated in the Stanford Prison Experiment. This is just one example of many controversial psychological experiments. Certain psychological experiments

Comparitive Critique Of Stanley Milgram's Prison Experiment And "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources Of Sadism" By Marianne Szegedy Maszak.

1529 words - 6 pages Put in the right circumstances, every human being has the potential to be a sadist. In "The Stanford Prison Experiment", Phillip G. Zimbardo examines how easily people can slip into roles and become sadistic to the people around them, even going so far as to develop a sense of supremacy. He does this by explaining the results of his experiment that he created to understand more about the effects that imprisonment has on prisoners, and how a