This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Rhetorical Analysis Of Antony’s Funeral Speech

1129 words - 5 pages

  On the Ides of March in 44 B.C., Roman Emperor Julius Caesar was stabbed to death by a group of prominent politicians led by Marcus Brutus. The sudden death of Caesar created a power vacuum which gave rise of a two factions, one headed by Brutus and Cassius and the other by Antony and the future triumvirs. Shortly after Caesar’s death, Antony spoke at his funeral and used the opportunity to lead the Roman people away from Brutus and back to believing in Caesar and consequently, the Second Triumvirate. By combining a subtle use of questions and interjections to keep audience engaged, a variety of rhetorical devices devices that dignify Caesar and himself, and an effective use of all three modes of persuasion, Antony is able to convert the audience to his cause while destroying the conspirators’ credibility.

  While Mark Antony’s speech is a eulogy Caesar’s funeral, it gradually develops the energetic tone of an epideictic (praise-and-blame speech), which points to an ulterior motive. He draws in his audience with a solemn introduction that is meant to defer any bad feelings the Roman’s have towards him, and then he begins to exemplify Caesar’s good character. However, his tone soon becomes more passionate and he begins to use interjections to arouse the listeners. By shouting “O judgment!” as he questions the Roman’s loyalty, Antony is making use of ecphonesis to force a reaction: hopefully one that supports Caesar. Antony strategically spaces these throughout the course of the speech to ensure their enthusiastic spirit, yet hide his own zeal from the audience. Most notably, he exclaims “what a fall was there, my countrymen!” to emphasize the magnitude of Caesar’s death and in the last line he shouts to them “here was a Caesar!”, which serves to remind them of his legacy. Along with the well-placed ecphonesis, Antony utilizes the rhetorical question to stimulate thought with the audience and keep them involved. He first uses it when he asks the audience “did this [military spoils] in Caesar seem ambitious?” so that he can start to have them question Brutus’s accusation and draw them to his subsequent examples. However, the most important use of a rhetorical question is in the last line where he challenges his audience if there “comes such another [Caesar]?”. Here the rhetorical question serves to summarize the greatness of Caesar and to pass the responsibility for future actions onto the listeners. As a result, the people will be more likely to act against the conspirators after they have realized there will not be anyone as good as Caesar.

  By keeping his listeners thoroughly engaged, Antony is able to further develop on his purpose by utilizing diverse rhetorical devices. Near the beginning, he makes effective use of parallelism to list Caesar’s selfless deeds, like “when that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept”, which gives the effect that the list is so long that Antony cannot describe it in unique detail. Additionally, his parallel...

Find Another Essay On Rhetorical Analysis of Antony’s Funeral Speech

Rhetorical Analysis of Lincoln's Second Inaugural Speech

659 words - 3 pages influential, formal, and emotional. Lincoln's style in this speech was inevitably persuasive. His rhetorical strategy appeals to not only the readers senses, but to their intellectual knowledge as well. ?The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is

Antony’s Speech Analysis-Julius Caesar - AP Language - English Essay

440 words - 2 pages Mili Shrestha AP Comp. Period 3 12/13/16 Antony’s Speech Analysis-Julius Caesar - Antony’s argument against Brutus was so convincing that Antony made the people burn down Brutus and Cassius’ houses and chase them out of Rome. - When Antony begins his speech, he addresses the citizens as friends and then asks them to listen. After that he implies that he respects Caesar but does not love him. Antony then begins his argument against Brutus, the

Native Son: analysis of rhetorical strategies- max's final speech

511 words - 2 pages when we first came here, are struggling within unbelievably narrow limits to achieve that feeling of at-home-ness for which we once strove so ardently." Max's speech combines the rhetorical strategies of similes, cause and effect, and comparison to convey his views on racial maltreatment and persecution. He effectively illustrates the very parts of society that caused Bigger's actions, and makes an notably moving case for Bigger's life.

Mark Antony’s Speech: The Use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos

706 words - 3 pages well that the crowd was threatening to burn the house of the conspirators. In conclusion, Mark Antony used the three rhetoric devices in his speech ethos, pathos, and logos to change the minds of the crowd. A crowd that, at first, was angry at Caesar and didn’t want to hear Mark Antony’s words. He made them see his perspective so effectively that after he was done with his speech he had got the whole crowd to want to go after the conspirators and kill them. Without the use of these rhetorical devices he would have never succeed at his goal of honoring Caesar and getting back at the men who killed him.

Analysis of the Speech Earl Spencer Gave at Princess Diana's Funeral

1441 words - 6 pages terrible car accident in Paris, France. The funeral was 6 days later on September 6, 1997, the funeral was heald at Westminter Abbey. Earl Spencer used many non-verbal many techniques during his speech to show his emotion in his words. Non-verbal is a type of communication when you do not use words or speech to potray how you feel or how it was written. Non-verbal techniques include stance, eye contact, hands, proximity and platform, facial

President Obama’s Inaugural Speech: Rhetorical Analysis

1016 words - 4 pages President Obama’s Inaugural Speech: Rhetorical Analysis Barrack Obama’s inauguration speech successfully accomplished his goal by using rhetoric to ensure our nation that we will be under safe hands. The speech is similar from ideas obtained from the founding documents and Martin Luther King’s speech to establish ‘our’ goal to get together and take some action on the problems our country is now facing. As President Barrack Obama starts his

Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's I Have A Dream Speech

1084 words - 4 pages The famous “I Have a Dream” speech delivered by Martin Luther King, Jr. at the historic March in Washington in August 1963 effectively urged the US government to take actions and to finally set up equality between the black and white people in America. Although there were many factors that contributed to the success of the speech, it was primarily King’s masterly use of different rhetorical instruments that encouraged Kennedy and his team to

Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's I Have A Dream Speech

989 words - 4 pages “all God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentile, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing” because he knows this is movement is greater than just for those of color. By expressing his emotions on the subject of racism, Kings persuasive speech influenced and impacted America, for the better in the early 1960’s. With his many uses of different rhetorical devices such as allusions, metaphors and smiles, and anaphoras Kings speech truly changed the minds of hundreds of thousands of people.

Rhetorical Analysis Of "I Have A Dream" Speech By Martin Luther King Jr

935 words - 4 pages From the steps of the Lincoln Memorial more than two score years ago, Dr. Martin Luther King electrified America with his momentous "I Have a Dream" speech. Aimed at the entire nation, King’s main purpose in this speech was to convince his audience to demand racial justice towards the mistreated African Americans and to stand up together for the rights afforded to all under the Constitution. To further convey this purpose more effectively, King

Rhetorical Analysis of Andrew Shepherd's Speech in Movie, The American President

1089 words - 4 pages . In the closing scenes of the movie, Shepherd is found defending himself and his character through the form of a rhetorical speech. He convincingly uses pathos to appeal to his audience’s sense of nationality and pride. As a typical politician should, Shepherd uses emotional appeal or pathos in his defense. When defending character, when defending emotion, the most logical approach is pathos. If one uses emotion to defend himself from

The Power of Mark Antony’s Speech in Julius Caesar and Winston Churchill’s Speech, Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat

1012 words - 4 pages The Power of a Speech Speeches are weapons; words that can be manipulated to attack a subject or person in a way that the author must decide. In the case of Mark Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar and Winston Churchill’s speech at the start of World War II, “Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat” are two speeches dealing with aggression towards a certain matter. Antony’s speech was created to gain the trust of the

Similar Essays

Marc Antony’s Speech @ Caesar’s Funeral

846 words - 4 pages Act I. Brutus was clearly overmatched at Caesar’s funeral. The imprudence led Brutus’s prose speech at the beginning to be shot down by Antony’s 37 lines of verse, a powerful thematic speech incorporating rhetoric and theatrics to stir up the crowd. Quite dexterous for a man who claimed to deny any ability to stir men’s blood. Antony does not praise Caesar, as Brutus said to. But instead he used his prime weapons at the beginning of the

Rhetorical Devices In Mark Antony’s Funerary Speech From Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

1052 words - 4 pages you then, to mourn for him?” (JC 3.2.103-104). He uses a rhetorical question to appeal to the public’s senses of guilt and shame. Not only does the question establish his persona as an emotional person, but it also cancels Brutus’s logical reasoning for the act because emotions hit people harder than facts. Furthermore, after creating an emotional environment, Antony states “I must pause” (JC 3.2.108). Before he concludes his speech with a proposal

Rhetorical Analysis Of President Obama's Inauguration Speech

1398 words - 6 pages things are the meanings of our citizenship, liberty, and confidence gives the feeling that we must maintain our responsibility to preserve the nation. Obama’s use of parallelism brings the speech together and implies a sense of power and instruction. A second rhetorical syntax strategy used by Obama is his use of phrases similar to “not only, but also”. Obama uses this strategy to show that there is more than one outcome to each of his propositions

Rhetorical Analysis Of Swami Vivekananda’s Speech

853 words - 3 pages the numerous human minds of those times. First, it is important to underline the rhetorical introduction of Swami Vivekananda. Indeed, Hindu monk surprised and quite shocked a lot of attendants on the meeting with non-standard intro: “Sisters and Brothers of America” (1). There was no addressing to Mrs. or Ms., as well as he did not start his speech with standard cliché ‘ladies and gentlemen’. Practically, Swami used powerful metaphoric