Right To Counsel Essay

1286 words - 5 pages

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” (US Const., 8th Amend.) As shown in the constitution the right to counsel for the defense is a key right in our judicial system. The role of the public-defender office is one of utmost importance and rightfully so; every day various arrests are made in relation to all sorts of crimes. As a result many of those who face charges will hire an attorney to provide them with legal assistance. However it is no secret that attorney fees can be quite costly and not everyone can afford to spend such large sums of money at any given point in time. To allow equal access, the government spends millions of taxpayer dollars on the public defense system. These offices and their employees are considered to be part of the Judicial Branch. Their purpose is to provide indigent defendants with access to trained attorneys, which in turn provide them with free legal assistance in regards to their respective case. However, with such a large and important task, this system has key issues that raise the following questions: Is there a standard for the service provided by the attorney that is met by the public defenders? Do these attorneys receive adequate training and funds in order to represent indigent defendants equally? Should the defendants be appointed attorneys who are equal to the prosecution’s attorney? We will discuss and analyze these questions in relation to other topics related to the right to counsel.
One of the main issues that public defenders face across the nation is a lack of resources and funds. Public defenders find it increasingly difficult to assist and accommodate their defendants when they themselves are not awarded the proper resources to fulfill this task. They often lack the funds to interview clients and witnesses and require judicial approval in order to retain experts (Ogletree). This lack of funding forces the public defender to take on a much higher caseload in comparison to his counter part at a private law firm. Public defenders often find little time to prepare for their client’s sentence hearing. Furthermore, newly appointed public defenders do not receive the adequate training and supervision and are expected to accomplish minimal training and often enter the legal fray directly after law school with minimal experience. This method of counsel upbringing genuinely compromises the quality of their services. Though this is not the case nationwide, it is nonetheless a fault in our judicial system (Citron).
Advocates for stronger public defender offices argue that...

Find Another Essay On Right to Counsel

Gideon's Trumpet by Anthony Lewis Essay

1703 words - 7 pages published in 1964, Gideon's Trumpet is a timeless treatment of one man's passionate quest to right a perceived wrong and his unfailing belief that when the Constitution's Sixth Amendment declared he had a right to counsel, the Constitution meant what it said. What he sought, really, was justice. Of course, Gideon's quest was not his alone after the petition was granted, and it did not take place in a vacuum, but without his belief that the right to

Gideon vs. Wainwright case Essay

1416 words - 6 pages Living in a country without having the right to any legal representation, can be very stressful. Forty years ago, on March 1963, the U.S Supreme Court announced one of the most important decisions in its History. The court case Gideon vs. Wainright, established clearly the right of a poor person charged with a felony crime to have a lawyer paid for by the state. The court also ruled that a state must provide legal counsel for anyone who is

Canadian Criminal Justice System

2284 words - 9 pages , and provide us with the right to counsel. The bail court departs from the ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ standard in that the crown only needs to prove on a balance of probabilities (Kellough, 1996, p. 175) in order to take away a person’s freedom. It is for this reason I decided to limit the scope of my observations to the bail court. What I found is a systemic evidence of a two-tier justice system. In this essay, I will outline the roles of the

Gideon's Trumpet

599 words - 2 pages one himself. As a result, Gideon was forced into a juryless trial that he later felt was very unfair, and he later brought up his right to a counsel when presenting his case to the Supreme Court. Gideon was hoping to invoke a very rare reversal of the court in which it overturns a much used precedent. The precedent in question is Betts v. Brady, in which a judge decided that states have the right to deny counsel in some federal cases.To make an

Legal Rights During a Trial

993 words - 4 pages What are my rights if I have to go to trial for a crime that I have been accused of committing? The accused have several legal rights during a trial. The purpose of these rights is to make sure that the accused receive a fair trial. A defendant’s legal rights during a trial include the following: the right to confront a witness, right to compulsory process, the right to counsel and the right to an impartial jury. The one aspect that these rights

This essay is about the Gideon vs. Wainwright case, in which the 14th amendment was based upon.

515 words - 2 pages accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed; which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.The Gideon

Gideons Trumpet

945 words - 4 pages one of Fortas? major points was saying that the Fourteenth Amendment in one way or another included the right to counsel, whether by absorption or incorporation.On Monday, March 18, 1963; the Court came up with its verdict. Justice Black, read though his opinion, stating that ? the Bill of Rights which is ?fundamental and essential to a fair trial? is made obligatory upon the states by the Fourteenth Amendment?We think the Court in Betts was wrong

Miranda Rights

1328 words - 5 pages was used in court against him. Miranda was undoubtedly found guilty.      Miranda v Arizona went all the way to the Supreme Court. There the Supreme Court ruled that the police do have a responsibility to inform a subject of an interrogation of their constitutional rights. The constitutional rights have to do with self-incrimination, and the right to counsel before, during and after questioning.      What does this mean to you? Well if

Madigan v. Levin

826 words - 4 pages , it is quite right to say that the dismissal could not have come soon enough. When Edward R. Theobald, III, the counsel for the respondent began to give his argument, it seemed to be much quicker, due to the fact that it had already been established that this case was going to be sent back to the Seventh Circuit and dismissed. In the end, Justice Antonin Scalia stated what one could assume the entire Court was thinking, “We don’t like to

Criminal Justice/ DIscuss the Bill of rights and their court cases and how they are applied today

726 words - 3 pages guaranteed individuals to a speedy trial, either a trial by jury or public trial. It also guaranteed individuals the right to confront witnesses and the right to counsel at various stages in some criminal proceedings. The right to counsel was later established in 1963 in the Gideon v. Wainwright court case. Gideon was convicted of a felony in Florida; he had to defend himself after he was denied the right to counsel. State failure to provide counsel for

Miranda vs. Arizona

600 words - 2 pages Miranda vs. Arizona:      This case had to do with an Ernest Miranda who raped a Patty McGee*. After extracting a written confession from the rapist about the situation, Miranda’s lawyer argued that it was not valid since the Phoenix Police Department failed to read Miranda his rights, also in violation of the Sixth Amendment which is the right to counsel. Some factors that helped support Miranda’s arguments were that

Similar Essays

The Right To Appointed Counsel In Decisions Of The United States Supreme Court Prior To Miranda V. Arizona (1966)

1804 words - 7 pages The right to appointed counsel in decisions of the United States Supreme Court prior to Miranda v. Arizona (1966) From the Judiciary Act to incorporation doctrine In the landmark decision Miranda v. Arizona (1966) the US Supreme Court stated in the name of Chief Justice Earl Warren that “…He [accused] has the right to the presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning

Imagine Communities: Perfect Communities To Live In

893 words - 4 pages by the majority vote of the people. The counsel runs the community in its entirety. It is not a dictatorship but sense the people of Colby voted the counsel into their positions all the trust is given to them to make the right decisions. The people obey them for this very reason. The counsel has no other job but to be a counsel members and the jobs they once held are given to the younger generation. After their term as a counsel member they are able to return to what ever perspective job they held before their term.

Recognizing Our Rights Essay

1179 words - 5 pages criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right….to have the Assistance of Counsel for his/her defense.” Only the U. S. Supreme Court has interpreting the constitution, has stated/ruled that, “the states would furnish counsel to who could not afford one.” Classification of defendants who could not afford their own counsel is labeled in court as “Indigents.’” In any crime, a defendant has their due process rights. These rights are why

The Sixth Amendment Essay

2656 words - 11 pages and it followed: "That in all capital or criminal Prosecutions, a man hath a right to demand the cause and nature of his accusation, to be confronted with the accusers and witnesses, to call for Evidence and be admitted counsel in his Favor, and to a fair and speedy Trial by an impartial Jury of his vicinage, without whose unanimous consent he cannot be found guilty, (except in the Government of the land and naval Forces in Time of actual war