This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Rousseau And Marx: The Radical Critics

1507 words - 7 pages

Throughout history, each political view, philosophy, or theology created has been reviewed and criticized during its time. The Classical Liberal Tradition emerging from Feudalism has created critics too. Two critics, Rousseau and Marx criticize the Classical Liberal Tradition’s central elements and form their own argument and alternative to others of their time like Hobbes and Locke.
The Classical Liberal Tradition key elements consist of rights and the rights of nature. For classical liberals like Hobbes and Locke, everyone has rights from nature and laws of nature. With these natural rights, we could then establish government based on consent of the people; thus the people forming a democratic system. In the state of nature, we are all free, and we are all equal. These rights apply to everyone and unalienable. The Classical Liberal Tradition is freedom for all by nature, for everyone.
With a movement as such, there exists philosophers and like-minded thinkings of their time who were also Classical Liberals, but much more radical, disputing their influentialists and the like. Rousseau disagreed with key elements of the Classical Liberal Tradition. In The Social Contract, Rousseau pokes fun at other philosophies about the force, slavery, and other points from other popular philosophers at the time. Rousseau’s human nature depicts a different story. Rousseau states that we [human beings] are social creatures. Human beings are intersocial and interdependent. Since human beings depend on each other, human beings must be equal, and there cannot be slaves. Rousseau states, “Thus, in whatever light we view things, the right of slavery is found null, not only because it is unjustifiable but because it is absurd and has no meaning. The terms ‘slavery’ and ‘right’ contradict and exclude each other”. Rousseau finds that if humans are not equal, there cannot even begin to have a solution to other philosophies. Rousseau explains this ideas as, “If each individual could alienate himself, he could not alienate his descendants; for, being born men and free, their liberty is their own, and no person can dispose of it but they themselves”, further stating to needing a solution.
Rousseau also attacks Classical Liberals on the idea of brute force. The section makes remarks that there is no rights when one is weaker to the other, yet takes away the rights with no justification. This revolves around the established principle, which Rousseau finds inherently wrong. Rousseau states, “Hence the right of the strongest--aright which seems ironical in appearance, but is really established on principle. But shall we never have an explanation of this term? Force is a physical power; I do not see what morality can result from its effects”. If we continue to use force as a means of unjustified power we will have again, master-slave relationship. Rousseau’s conclusion on the continuation of force is explained as, “For, if we admit that force constitutes right, the effect...

Find Another Essay On Rousseau and Marx: The Radical Critics

Radical and the Republican Essay

1020 words - 5 pages In his book The Radical and the Republican, James Oakes compares and contrasts the positions of Fredrick Douglas and Abraham Lincoln. Oakes argues that while both Douglas and Lincoln opposed slavery, they used dissimilar tactics because their motivations were different. Lincoln focused on promoting national unity through the eradication of slavery ( 217) while Douglas focused on establishing freedom for blacks ( 223). Oakes strongly supports

Rousseau and The Republican Party Essay

1441 words - 6 pages Rousseau and The Republican Party     The Republican Party, since its first convention in Michigan in 1854, has had a philosophy that has remained relatively unchanged. Its oath entices Americans to believe that "good government is based on the individual and that each person's ability, dignity, freedom and responsibility must be honored and recognized"   In this essay, I will examine the Republican's main philosophies and will

Rousseau and the Phlosophes: Immanent Critique

1258 words - 5 pages Rousseau the CriticDespite his radical critique of Enlightenment, Jean Jacques Rousseau belongs to it. He remained loyal to the Enlightenment in two important ways, despite this disagreement over certain "fundamental" beliefs. The first was in his commitment to the authority of reason and its ability to help the thinker reach his conclusions independently. He shared the commitment to a program of research that was common to the entire

Rousseau and the "Government of Poland"

903 words - 4 pages Throughout Poland during the late eighteenth century, many disputes over land and politics were occurring. During the years of 1771 until 1792, Poland had been partitioned three times. By 1792, Poland didn't even exist due to a poor army and no governmental structure. Finally, Poland was split up between Russia, Poland, and Austria. Rousseau sees the Poles at this time as rather selfish people. Rousseau has many thoughts on how Poland could be

Rousseau and the Artists of th

1429 words - 6 pages Jean-Jacques Rousseau, (1712-1778) was a French social philosopher and writer. His book Du Contrat Social, ou Principes du droit politique (Social Contract) published in 1762, emphasised the rights of the people over the government and was a significant influence on the French Revolution . Rousseau believed that people were not social beings by nature. He stated that ?Society corrupts individuals by bringing out their inclination toward

Hobbes and Rousseau, The State of Nature

1528 words - 7 pages Both Hobbes and Rousseau have different even opposing views on the topic of the natural state of man. These views play a major role on their beliefs and reasoning for why man needs society and government. These beliefs can be easily summarized with Hobbes believing in an inherent selfishness and competition in man, whereas Rousseau’s views on things is far more positive, believing that man is far happier in his natural state, and the root of

The Perfect Woman: Rousseau and Wollstonecraft

2074 words - 9 pages If scholarship is done right, it is that which is done impartially. The topic of this paper, the perfect woman, written by a man, may give those with prejudgments a ready answer to it; without the due analysis required by it. Reading both authors now, it is easy to bash Rousseau with sexism and stamp Wollstonecraft with feminism. But such was not my task, rather I examined both with an unprejudiced eye to the best of my ability. Thus, I hope

Rousseau and the chains of society

849 words - 3 pages All men are born equal, but even before taking his first step or uttering his first word, a baby understands that it is every man for himself. Human nature may be born good--pure, simple, and as innocent as the baby himself--but when left to survive in this world, societal influences will ultimately shape and twist it into something else entirely. Rousseau understood this progression of human nature, and society's corruption of it. As he

Marx and the Two Enlightenments

3119 words - 12 pages Marx and the Two Enlightenments ABSTRACT: The claim to rationality is disputed by two rival enlightenments, which collided in the dispute between Plato, Socrates and the Sophists, and which Marx united critically. He criticizes the capitalist system immanently as restrictive of production, and its market as not a case of freedom or equality (justice). However, Marx is most concerned with ontological injustice, coerced alienation of the


930 words - 4 pages In the mid-eighteenth century, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, one of the most important French philosophers of the time, wrote Lettre sur la musique francaise (Letter on French Music) in response to the musical debate pitting French music against Italian music. In the first part of this paper, an attempt will be made to explain both Rousseau’s argument for so heavily criticizing the music of his people and what elements of Italian music he prefers; in

Augustine and Rousseau and the State of Human Nature

2422 words - 10 pages Both Jean Jacques Rousseau and Saint Augustine present two distinct, yet co-related accounts of the human being and the consequences of unrestrained human desire. All were great philosophers of their time, who offered various standpoints concerning the state of human nature. These great thinkers differed and shared certain similarities regarding their thoughts on the nature of the human being. Thus the purpose of this paper is to put forward a

Similar Essays

Marx (The Communist Manifesto) And Rousseau

2152 words - 9 pages The political philosophy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx examined the role that the state played and its relationship to its citizen’s participation and access to the political economy during different struggles and tumultuous times. Rousseau was a believer of the concept of social contract with limits established by the good will and community participation of citizens while government receives its powers given to it. Karl Marx

Marx And Rousseau Essay

1681 words - 7 pages the geographic circumstances. Although Rousseau’s true democracy is very hard to achieve in this day and age with such a vast population, according to Rousseau this political participation is the only way to regain some of our natural freedoms,“Freedom is the power to choose our own chains”. Marx also believes that civil and political rights are the best form of emancipation till now, but he takes it a step further and argues that in order to

Karl Marx And His Radical Views

1255 words - 5 pages Karl Marx and His Radical Views Karl Marx[i] Karl Marx is among the most important and influential of all modern philosophers who expressed his ideas on humans in nature. According to the University of Dayton, “the human person is part of a larger history of life on this planet. Through technology humans have the power to have an immense effect on that life.”[ii] The people of his time found that the impact of the

Compare The Conception Of Freedom By Any Two Of The Following: Rousseau, Marx And Mills

2760 words - 11 pages Compare the conception of freedom by any two of the following: Rousseau, Marx and Mills.Freedom in the most basic terms is a license to do what one wishes. Citizens can experiment with certain behaviour both good and bad, without becoming criminals. The idea of freedom has been one that has many interpretations to it. People view it in different ways. Therefore, the freedom in one state will be different to another. For example in states like