This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Rousseau’s Social Contract Essay

600 words - 2 pages

Rousseau’s political theory revolves around a central idea that in order to deal with moral or political inequality (“social” inequality), man must move out of the state of nature and establish a social contract, “a form of association which defends and protects… the person and goods of each associate, and by the means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau 432). Although Rousseau’s plan pledges to protect individual liberty, the plan rests on the legislation of the “general will” and the successful unity of a “body politic,” both of which are vaguely defined and become too concerned with state interest.
Rousseau defines the general will as concerning “only the general interest,” saying it can be arrived at by taking all individual wills and “[removing] … the pluses and minuses” from each to “cancel each other out” (437). He doesn’t say what parts of individual opinion are “pluses and minuses” however. Rousseau’s outlook on humanity seems to be overwhelmingly positive in this case, since he assumes that people will need no specific guidelines to lead “good” political lives. This faith in humanity is where his arguments become weak.
Although Rousseau has faith in human beings to be inherently “good,” he does concede that society is what corrupts people– since his plan is to lay out a new kind of society, it seems strange that he would not plot his theory out more specifically in case anyone failed to make “good” decisions. He also writes that the “general will” is what people should appeal to when making decisions, and that these decisions are “always right and always tend toward the public utility” (437). This concept of an infallible general will also becomes problematic.
By writing that “the populace is never corrupted, but it is often tricked,”...

Find Another Essay On Rousseau’s Social Contract

On whether America still exists Essay

1139 words - 5 pages Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s critique of representative governments in The Social Contract raises important questions about our own government. Clearly the United States allows representatives for groups of people in the law making process, so do we, as a nation, still exist? I think I can safely say without citations that we do, indeed, still exist. However, to leave the question answered like that would be naive and uneducational. For that reason

Rousseau Social Contract Essay

1541 words - 6 pages their own security and merge with others? This is the elementary predicament to which Rousseau’s social contract holds the solution to. Rousseau’s premises are plausible. They successfully lead to and support the conclusion; which is that individuals should alienate themselves totally into the community to establish a supreme power directed by the desire of the general will; a common ego. There is good reason to believe that Rousseau’s conclusion

John Locke: Founding Father of Modern Era Liberalism

1654 words - 7 pages provided everyone with adequate protection endorsed by the community while preserving the free will and liberty of each (A Discourse on the Origins of Inequality, II, p. 29). Rousseau’s account of the social contract does not reflect the framework of modern liberalism due to the fact that it stresses the importance of community, whereas modem liberalism emphasizes the importance of individualism, an aspect that Locke focuses on when discussing

Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau

2132 words - 9 pages in innocence where he is virtuous. Rousseau does not agree that man is an aggressive and greedy being in the original state of nature; in contrast, the life of man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” as Hobbes suggests (Leviathan, 408). Rousseau argues that men are truly happy in the state of nature. Only when men become sociable, they become wicked. In Rousseau’s Social Contract, man is depicted as an ignorant, unimaginative animal

The Natural Ways of Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau

1382 words - 6 pages philosophers mainly concern themselves with the concept of the social contract. Rousseau, Hobbes, and Locke begin with the conception of the individual, because in the natural state, they all believe that man is an independent character. Each of the philosophers used their revolutionary concepts to challenge power, yet their arguments differ dramatically. Through their texts, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau portray Enlightenment ideals of their time period

Rousseau and Marx: The Radical Critics

1507 words - 7 pages . With a movement as such, there exists philosophers and like-minded thinkings of their time who were also Classical Liberals, but much more radical, disputing their influentialists and the like. Rousseau disagreed with key elements of the Classical Liberal Tradition. In The Social Contract, Rousseau pokes fun at other philosophies about the force, slavery, and other points from other popular philosophers at the time. Rousseau’s human nature

Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke: Their Relevance for American Society

2166 words - 9 pages In Second Treatise on Government and The Social Contract, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau each present and describe their own perceptions of what allows for equality, freedom and democracy. Of the many major ideas developed throughout these texts, the two main distinctions between the two philosophers are natural freedom versus civil freedom and individualism versus collectivism. John Locke, who provided the framework that would allow for

Freedom for Rousseau and Individual Liberties

2415 words - 10 pages Freedom for Rousseau and Individual Liberties The purpose which Rousseau ostensibly gives his social contract is to free man from the illegitimate chains to which existing governments have shackled him. If this is his aim, then it follows that he should be most concerned with the preservation of freedom in political society, initially so that savage man might be lured out of nature and into society in the first place, and afterwards so

Rousseau and Machiavelli

1203 words - 5 pages legitimate government that was elected by a civil society based on social contract. Both philosophers wanted to develop an ideal structure for the development of a functional society. They both had different tactics in doing so but aim for the same thing, a great society. Rousseau’s approach seems most persuading to me in the sense that is based off a group of people coming together and deciding what is best for the majority. Machiavelli influenced

Rousseau on the HRC Community

1096 words - 5 pages As with any modern community, there are certain freedoms that need be alienated in order to live in peace with fellow neighbors. It is the HRC covenant, the Guide to Community Living, and the prayers of Taizé give meaning to the community known as the Honors Residential College (HRC). The texts each serve as evidence of Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract Theory in work, each including a type of self-sacrifice for the greater good and

Marx and Rousseau

1681 words - 7 pages social contract is restrictive in movement and that it binds people in “chains”. Rousseau’s social contract, the sovereign is made up of the people who come together to form a state. Unlike Hobbes people have sovereignty over the laws and rules of their society it is not entrusted in only one person, because Rousseau argues that people will be the most free when they have consent over the laws that govern them. And also lock’s sovereign is chosen

Similar Essays

Rousseau’s: State Of Nature And Social Contract

1480 words - 6 pages In the writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau he describes what he believes is the state of nature and the social contract that humans form in civilizations. This discussion mostly takes place in his book called the “Social Contract”. The first area that will be covered is what Rousseau thinks is the state of nature. This will then be followed by what he believes is the social contract that humans enter to live in normal society or civilization. The

John Locke’s Two Treatises Of Government And Jean Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract

1373 words - 5 pages authority. However, Locke’s opponents attack the conservative conclusions of his protection of property because it leads to inequality of wealth and power. Among Locke’s critics was Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s The Social Contract was published in 1762. This work shapes how the government could be present in such a way that it safeguards the equality and morality of its people (IEP). Rousseau criticized Locke’s political

How Does Rousseau Understand The Concept Of Freedom? Is His Account Adequate?

1574 words - 7 pages society and the inevitable state of becoming unfree. The paper will then continue by looking at Rousseau’s solution to the loss of natural freedom, and how his ‘Social Contract’ theory is intended to bestow the ideals of moral and civil freedom, onto wholly engaged citizens in a truly democratic society. The essay will conclude by probing Rousseau account of freedom in order to examine its adequacy. In order for Rousseau to construct his vision

Thomas Hobbes And Jean Jacques Rousseau Essay

2212 words - 9 pages form of democracy in its ideal form, and would continually work toward the concept of the common good. All in all I feel as though Rousseau’s social contract is a more plausible idea as far as political philosophy goes. The argument is shaped by their very fundamental view of human nature; Rousseau’s being a little bit more moderate than Hobbes’. Hobbes envisions a totalitarianism government being necessary in order to protect against the