This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Rousseau And The Two Main Forms Of Civil Freedom

1460 words - 6 pages

In his writing, Rousseau describes two main forms of freedom— the absolute liberty we enjoy in the state of nature and the freedom we preserve in civil society. The former freedom is fundamentally unattractive, and the latter can be achieved only with the concept of the general will. While this democracy is seemingly equitable, it ultimately suffers from numerous flaws that cause the freedom achieved in this state to be rather unappealing.
In the state of nature, freedom is described as the condition where mankind is allowed to do virtually anything. They are limited only by ability and their notion of pity, which inspires them to act in their own self-interest while doing as little harm to others as possible. While not subjugated to arbitrary rule in this state, men are also isolated. And as we see from mankind’s tendency to have families, form communities, and live in society, we would be unable to maintain this form of freedom.
But even if we could, there are several reasons why the absolute liberty of the state of nature is undesirable. First off, there is no uniform standard for how each person should pity another. While one person might refrain from kicking a man when he’s down, another, less agreeable individual might not do the pitiful man the same favor. Furthermore, this lack of standard mixed with the condition of absolute freedom can easily lead to a Hobbesian state of war. Life in such a state would truly be “nasty, brutish, and short;” society must be formed to prevent such a paltry condition. And finally, as Rousseau suggests, the savage man is devoid of thought. He has no appreciation for the arts, no strong emotions, and neither reason nor wisdom to guide his actions. Subsequently, freedom in the state of nature comes at the price of mankind being quite unhappy.
Rousseau admits that the evolution from the state of nature into a civil state is favorable, as we gain justice and morality in place of sheer impulse. This shift from “natural liberty” to “civil liberty” also indicates a shift in the concept of freedom. As a part of society, each person is subject to laws and the power of government; in a sense forfeiting all liberties. The only way for each individual to retain his freedom, then, is if he were the one who authored the laws and him who authorized government to rule. This can only be achieved when the community agrees to the general will. By doing so, each individual is subject to the rule of the community of the whole, which he is inherently a part of. By this logic, because the community, as the general will, rules in the public interest, the individual still essentially rules over himself. There is no leeway for an independent or outside force to gain power, thereby preventing arbitrary rule.
But achieving such a state is rather difficult, and the course of human events has suggested a different progression of authority in society. Rousseau first argues in The Second Discourse that human progress and the...

Find Another Essay On Rousseau and the two main forms of civil freedom

Two Forms of the Generalized Uncertainty Principle

1937 words - 8 pages Various theories of quantum gravity predict the existence of a minimum length scale, which leads to the modification of the standard uncertainty principle to the Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP). In this paper, we study two forms of the GUP and calculate their implications on the energy of the harmonic oscillator and the Hydrogen atom more accurately than previous studies. In addition, we show how the GUP modifies the Lorentz force law

Two Forms of Journalism Essay

1837 words - 7 pages . The old media in events where factual information is more important than a presentation of opinions and the new media in situations of crisis when vividness of first person account and a sense of belonging is needed. Essentially, these two forms of media complement each other, where one is weak the other is strong. So, we would do best to draw on the strengths instead of fight the "press" in order to be well informed citizens of the world.

Freedom for Rousseau and Individual Liberties

2415 words - 10 pages begins to take shape in the transition from nature to society, in which a fundamental shift occurs in human nature that translates into a change in the nature of freedom between the two states. Entrance into civil society, Rousseau argues, “produces the most remarkable change in man by substituting justice for instinct in his conduct” (I.viii.1). That is, entering civil society allows man to exist peacefully in it by replacing his natural self

Classical and Operant Conditioning: A Contrast. Clearly explains both forms of conditioning and contrasts the two

1302 words - 5 pages Though classical conditioning and operant conditioning are both techniques involving learning and the acquisition of behaviors, they have contrasting--but sometimes complementary-- ways of training. However, with pioneers in each conditioning practice believing in the general principle, "Psychology should be based on experimental investigation of behaviors," the two fields often intersect.Classical conditioning was brought to the forefront of

Rousseau and the Artists of th

1429 words - 6 pages Jean-Jacques Rousseau, (1712-1778) was a French social philosopher and writer. His book Du Contrat Social, ou Principes du droit politique (Social Contract) published in 1762, emphasised the rights of the people over the government and was a significant influence on the French Revolution . Rousseau believed that people were not social beings by nature. He stated that ?Society corrupts individuals by bringing out their inclination toward

Rousseau and the "Government of Poland"

903 words - 4 pages Throughout Poland during the late eighteenth century, many disputes over land and politics were occurring. During the years of 1771 until 1792, Poland had been partitioned three times. By 1792, Poland didn't even exist due to a poor army and no governmental structure. Finally, Poland was split up between Russia, Poland, and Austria. Rousseau sees the Poles at this time as rather selfish people. Rousseau has many thoughts on how Poland could be

Rousseau and the chains of society

849 words - 3 pages participants (over 2,000,000), testify that societal direction has taken a wrong--and disastrous--turn. The number of people who will die from lung cancer this year is estimated at 21,100 people. This is a direct consequence of societal influences, but which society has not taken responsibility for. The freedom to enjoy alcohol and cigarettes destroys the obviously more important right to life, and Rousseau insists that those victims should be forced

Hobbes and Rousseau, The State of Nature

1528 words - 7 pages Both Hobbes and Rousseau have different even opposing views on the topic of the natural state of man. These views play a major role on their beliefs and reasoning for why man needs society and government. These beliefs can be easily summarized with Hobbes believing in an inherent selfishness and competition in man, whereas Rousseau’s views on things is far more positive, believing that man is far happier in his natural state, and the root of

The Two Main Branches of Art Therapy

2479 words - 10 pages The Two Main Branches of Art therapy Art therapy began as a natural extension of Freud’s groundbreaking psychoanalytic theories at the turn of the last century. Psychiatrists discovered that visual arts could be used as a tool of assessment, and by the 1940s art was being used not only for assessment, but also in therapeutic applications (Junge, 2010). Two main branches evolved from these early years: art as therapy and art psychotherapy. With

How does Rousseau understand the concept of freedom? Is his account adequate?

1574 words - 7 pages society and the inevitable state of becoming unfree. The paper will then continue by looking at Rousseau’s solution to the loss of natural freedom, and how his ‘Social Contract’ theory is intended to bestow the ideals of moral and civil freedom, onto wholly engaged citizens in a truly democratic society. The essay will conclude by probing Rousseau account of freedom in order to examine its adequacy. In order for Rousseau to construct his vision

"Freedom of Will": comparing Chinua Achebe's "Civil Peace" and Ngugi wa Thiong'o's "Meeting in the Dark"

1831 words - 7 pages , respectively Civil Peace and Meeting in the Dark.In the case of Jonathan Iwegbu, protagonist of the novel Civil Peace, "freedom of choice" is represented as the individual conclusion of a profound understanding of God's presence in his life. Jonathan went through a series of hardships, which made him realize how fate can be subdued to man's power. After surviving the Nigerian Civil War Jonathan came to the point in his life when all he had left was

Similar Essays

Compare The Conception Of Freedom By Any Two Of The Following: Rousseau, Marx And Mills

2760 words - 11 pages Compare the conception of freedom by any two of the following: Rousseau, Marx and Mills.Freedom in the most basic terms is a license to do what one wishes. Citizens can experiment with certain behaviour both good and bad, without becoming criminals. The idea of freedom has been one that has many interpretations to it. People view it in different ways. Therefore, the freedom in one state will be different to another. For example in states like

Rousseau & Mill On The Limitations Of Freedom

2035 words - 8 pages philosophy referring to the desire or interest of a people as a whole. This notion was first introduced in his work, The Social Contract: an analysis of the contractual relationships that may be necessary in order to establish legitimate government. Rousseau argues that civil society is based on a contractual arrangement of rights and duties which applies equally to all people, whereby natural liberty is exchanged for civil liberty, and natural rights

Explain The Main Forms Of Utilitarianism

989 words - 4 pages Carys Jones 26th March 2014EXPLAIN THE MAIN PRINCIPLES OF CLASSICAL FORMS OF UTILITARIANISMUtilitarianism is the idea that the greatest good for the greatest number, so the action that causes the most number of people, pleasure or happiness. It is a teleological theory of ethics, as it is more concerned with the outcome rather than the act. It is also relative and subjective. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory as it decides whether an

Inferring Freedom And Equality. Speaks Of Jean Jacques Rousseau

992 words - 4 pages legitimate society. The American government still displays many factors from Rousseau's model of a legitimate society after two hundred years of evolving into the late 20th century nation of America; also, Rousseau would be pleased of the result of a government abiding by a constitution with many of his doctrines.First of all, freedom, or 'forced to be free,' and equality presuppose each other in some instances, but sometimes they are