Rule Of Law Essay

9161 words - 37 pages

Real and Imagined Threats to the Rule of Law: On Brian Tamanaha's Law As A Means To An End.†
Ofer Raban∗
Brian Tamanaha's Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law is a book about
an allegedly dangerous transformation of legal consciousness - from a "non-instrumental" to an
"instrumental" view of the law.1 The book - which gathered rave peer reviews and was selected
in 2007 for special honor by the Association of American Publishers2 - borrows the first half of
its title from Rudolf von Jhering's celebrated 1877 manuscript, in which Jhering advocated the
view (which today may appear self-evident) that the law should be understood and interpreted as
a means to the achievement of social ends. 3 But what may seem obvious today was not always
so: Tamanaha argues that Jhering's thesis signaled a radical change in legal consciousness, from
a "non-instrumental" to an "instrumental" view of the law; and that change, he says, poses a
serious threat to our Rule of Law.
What is an "instrumental" view of the law? "An instrumental view," reads the opening
paragraph of Tamanaha's book, is the belief that
law is a means to an end .… [A]n instrument of power to advance [people's] personal interests or the interests or policies of the individuals or groups they support. Today, law is widely viewed as an empty vessel to be filled as desired, and to be manipulated, invoked, and utilized in the furtherance of ends.4
† BRIAN TAMANAHA, LAW AS A MEANS TO AN END: THREAT TO THE RULE OF LAW (2006).
∗ Assistant Professor of Law, University of Oregon School of Law. J.D., Harvard Law School, D.Phil., Oxford
University. I would like to thank Brian Tamanaha, Lee Goldman, and Bret Boyce for their helpful comments. 1 BRIAN TAMANAHA, LAW AS A MEANS TO AN END: THREAT TO THE RULE OF LAW (2006).
2 The peer appraisals sported on the dust jacket call the book "THE important book of legal theory for this decade,"
and a book with "the potential to change thinking about the law in fundamental ways". 3 Jhering's book was published in the United States under this title in 1913. RUDOLF VON JHERING, LAW AS A
MEANS TO AN END (Isaac Husik trans., Boston Book Co. 1913). 4 TAMANAHA, supra note 1, at 1.

Previous generations, by contrast, thought of the law differently: they believed that the content of
our laws was determined by factors that were beyond our control. This idea is most evident in
the theory of "natural law," which dominated legal minds for millennia, and which maintained
that human laws were determined by the very nature of our universe: "True law," said Cicero in
the first century B.C.,
is right reason in agreement with nature; it is of universal application, unchanging and everlasting …. It is a sin to try to alter this law, nor is it allowable to attempt to repeal any part it, and it is impossible to abolish it entirely. We cannot be freed from its obligations by senate or people .…5
Thirteen centuries later, Thomas...

Find Another Essay On Rule of law

Being Rules Under Rule of Law

1071 words - 5 pages There is a Centuries long debate as to why our Nation’s Founding Fathers chose for us to be ruled under rule of law instead of rule of man. Our Founding Fathers founded this nation on a promotion “We the People”. They ruled that we should be led under the rule of law rather than the rule of man for multiple reasons. Our government now though is stipulating whether or not the old American government made the right choice, when compared to

The Rule of Law in America

1066 words - 5 pages There is a Centuries long debate as to why our Nation’s Founding Fathers chose for us to be ruled under rule of law instead of rule of man. Our Founding Fathers founded this nation on a promotion “We the People”. They ruled that we should be led under the rule of law rather than the rule of man for multiple reasons. Our government now though is stipulating whether or not the old American government made the right choice, when compared to other

The Rule of Law in America

708 words - 3 pages Many people ask, why did our Founding Fathers want the United States to be governed by the rule of law, instead of men? And, how does that make us different from other countries? Many people don’t know what a rule of law is, a rule of law is a First Principle that mandates that the law governs everyone. The rule of law also requires that the same law govern all citizens. Founding Father Samuel Adams observed that the rule of law means that

The Rule of Law in America

644 words - 3 pages were given the short end of the stick. But through all of this I do believe we have some of the most caring people in the world. To say that a bad government must be established for fear of anarchy is really saying that we should kill ourselves for fear of dying. Our country is a copy of Greek democracy because of founding fathers action to let us be. In US if you don’t have a rule of law there will be chaos. The founding fathers believed that

The Meaning and Constitutional Significance of the Rule of Law

2130 words - 9 pages The Meaning and Constitutional Significance of the Rule of Law The rule of law means different things to different people. The meaning of the rule of law is a state of order in which events conform to the law. The rule of law often is stated to be one of the fundamental doctrines of principle of the UKconstitutional. Generally it has been seen as a characteristic feature of western liberal democracies. A widely-assumed

Seperation of Powers and the Rule of Law

1139 words - 5 pages ‘…If you maltreat a penguin in the London Zoo, you do not escape prosecution because you are the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.’ The rule of law broadly requires; that all are equal before the law , that the government is subject to the law and must exercise its power according to the law, finally that ‘there exist fundamental individual liberties and minimum standards of justice, to which the law must conform’ . The rule of law is problematic

The Downward Spiral of Venezuela’s Rule of Law

623 words - 3 pages the protesters and the government, however, skepticism reigns on the mind of those who have been disappointed by the corrupt government. This skepticism is a result of the government exerting the rule by law instead of the rule of law. This inadequate use of the law has not only created corruption in the government, it has also created great economical distress in Venezuela. In Venezuela, around 75% of the population believe that there is

Seperation of Powers, Rule of Law and Responsible Government

1703 words - 7 pages The increasing complexities of present diverse societies have led parliaments to develop various types of laws and regulations on the basis of the establishment of these intricate notions of rule of law, separation of powers and responsible government in order to maintain social order and harmony between police, citizens and the government. These implementation have distinctive application within contemporary society and the way in which

Malaysia: Rule of Law and Independence of the Judiciary

6151 words - 25 pages competition, guaranteed civil and political liberties, including freedoms of press, of speech and of association, accountability and transparency of governance and the Rule of Law. Given these principles of democracy and the alleged insufficiency of their adherence in Malaysia, the country has been referred to as a paradox of "semiauthoritarian" rule in a participatory political system and has therefore often been labeled as "semi-democratic" or

UK's Constitution: The Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty

2184 words - 9 pages Parliamentary sovereignty, a core principle of the UK's constitution, essentially states that the Parliament is the ultimate legal authority, which possesses the power to create, modify or end any law. The judiciary cannot question its legislative competence, and a Parliament is not bound by former legislative provisions of earlier Parliaments. The ‘rule of law’ on the other hand, is a constitutional doctrine which primarily governs the

Why is there so much disagreement about the meaning of the rule of law? Illustrate your answer with reference to at least two rule of law theorists

1886 words - 8 pages There are several main approaches to defining the rule of law including formal and substantive, and functional conceptions of the rule of law. In this essay I am going to explore the formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law. The formulistic approach to the rule of law which is to explore the definitions of the rule of law we must look at the existence of certain criteria to test the rule of law and not see whether the law is ?good

Similar Essays

The Rule Of Law Essay

714 words - 3 pages The Rule of Law The rule of law maybe defined in brief as a doctrine that no individual, however powerful is above the law. In principle Rule of Law had a significant influence on attempts to restrain the arbitrary use of power by rulers and the growth of legally enforced Human Rights in many western countries. It is often used as a justification for separately legislative from

The Rule Of Law Essay

1289 words - 5 pages The Rule of Law The Magna Carta 1215 and the Bill of Rights 1688 were attempts made by people of the time to enforce the rule of law in Britain. The rule of law is a set of values or principles that are the cornerstone of our legal system. These principles are known or readily discoverable and therefore do not change without

The Rule Of Law Essay

1375 words - 6 pages The Rule of Law The United Kingdomis generally regarded as a country that has a tradition of respect for the rule of law. In general terms this means that there is a historical tradition of public bodies providing a specific legal justification for their actions, and of the courts adjudicating impartially on disputes between citizens and on disputes between citizens and the state. Furthermore this also means that those

Maintaining The Rule Of Law Essay

965 words - 4 pages The judicial court system aims to achieve justice by upholding the ‘rule of law’, in which everyone is ‘subject to the law and can rely on the law to set the bounds within which other people and governments can operate.’ However, the rule of law does not always work to prevent all injustice, and lawyers should be actively involved in developing and maintaining the rule of law to establish a civil society which can be the foundation of justice