This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Rules In Utilitarianism Reconsidered Essay

1670 words - 7 pages

Question 3:
Is utilitarianism able to account for the importance of justice and honesty? Be sure to discuss both rule and act utilitarianism. Do either of these accounts work? Explain your answer.

Justice and Honesty: Rules in Utilitarianism Reconsidered

Utilitarianism, with the Principle of Utility or Greatest Happiness Principle being its core, is a consequentialist theory which attaches the greatest importance to the consequences of each action. While acting justly and honestly may not always bring the best consequences, some criticize its conflicts between traditional moral rules or virtues, such as justice and honesty.

To answer the challenge, it is essential to distinguishing two kinds of utilitarianism, one being act-utilitarianism and the other being rule-utilitarianism. In order to focus on the question about the relationship between the two moral rules and utilitarianism, I am not going to compare which kind of utilitarianism is more convincing. Rather, I argue that both types of utilitarianism could avoid the conflicts mentioned before, and could account for the significance of justice and honesty.

It is suitable to define justice and honesty before evaluating act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism. To our common understanding, justice is that people should get what they are due (Audi), while honesty requires one to tell the truth, and to be trustworthy. Although in extreme situations, the limits given by justice and honesty can be reasonably crossed, it is still widely accepted that this kind of limits should be well-respected (Deigh 102). In short, justice and honesty are moral rules that can rarely be violated.

In this paper I would like to shed light on the fact that utilitarianism could justify why justice and honest are significant, even though both act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism adopt the Principle of Utility and consequences as their core. Below I will discuss how act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism account for the importance of justice and honesty respectively.

1. Act-utilitarianism

Act-utilitarianism is the doctrine that whether an action is right or wrong depends upon the utility it produces, compared with other possible alternatives(Audi). Moral rules, such as justice and honesty, are only references for people to achieve greatest utility. It should be noted that the act-utilitarian do oppose that people take moral rules to be divine and inviolable. In other words, in act-utilitarianism, the application of the Principle of Utility on individual actions is always prior to the conformity to moral rules.

Although the act-utilitarian suggest the Principle of Utility is previous to moral rules, that does not mean they neglect the importance of these principles. It was suggested by J.J. C. Smart that a real act-utilitarian will refer to the common moral rules as his standard of making decisions in most circumstances. However, the reason for this lies not in how divine these moral rules are, but...

Find Another Essay On Rules in Utilitarianism Reconsidered

What's the difference between act (AU) and rule utilitarianism (RU)? What are the strengths and weaknesses of each?

554 words - 3 pages What's the difference between act (AU) and ruleutilitarianism (RU)? What are the strengths andweaknesses of each?In the past Utilitarianism was judged on each individual action, after many years pastedthen Utilitarianism was judge on the consequences of the truth and a lie. Yourconsequences are judged on thoughts such as a promise you made or the truth you wastold. "The new version of the theory Rule Utilitarianism, which is distinguishing it

Utilitarianism Essay

1459 words - 6 pages between the two forms of utilitarianism will also be discussed. Within his paper, J.J.C. Smart poses some very valid challenges towards utilitarianism. This paper will outline these challenges and propose some possible rebuttals from John Stuart Mill.Extreme UtilitarianismAccording to Smart, an extreme utilitarian believes that general rules are simply rules of thumb that we use in order to avoid having to figure out the possible consequences of

A Brief Analysis of John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism

1019 words - 4 pages counters by removing motivation from the picture. Utilitarianism is not concerned with motivations, but with ends. Another objection concerns the inability to determine all possible outcomes of all possible choices in a given situation. Mill means to apply utilitarianism to rules, not to individual situations (unless a precedent has not been established). Mill also responds to a number of objections which are unanswerable by many philosophies

Describe The Main Strengths And Weaknesses Of Utilitarianism

1040 words - 5 pages it was for the happiness of the majority. Any prejudices the decision maker may hold are eradicated in Utilitarianism, as they have to stick to the main rule. There is also some flexibility for emotions in moral decision making according to Rule Utilitarianism. This part of the theory allows respect for the rules that are created to better our society although even these rules do not have to be kept all the time if you are a weak utilitarian which

Utilitarianism: Greatest Happiness Principle

2263 words - 9 pages . Utilitarianism mainly focuses on the possible consequences of a decision. When facing more than one option, utilitarianism allows you to judge what is right and wrong by weighing the outcomes of the actions according to the “Greatest Happiness Principle” (John Stuart Mill, 1861) that is to achieve the greatest amount of happiness for most people. (Michael Vlach, 2012) In utilitarianism, there is only one right solution. A

Critisism for Rule and Act Utilitarianism

1379 words - 6 pages consider every consequence before taking any action. There are two classical forms of utilitarianism; rule utilitarianism and act utilitarianism. “Rule utilitarianism is the idea that an act is right if and only if it is required by a rule that is itself a member of a set of rules whose acceptance would lead to greater utility for society than any available alternative” (Pojman, 127). Take for instance, stopping at a red light. According to rule

Setting Up A Moral System

578 words - 2 pages greatest number. On the other hand, the rule approach toutilitarianism is that people establish and follow rules which will bring about thegreatest good for the greatest number. The major conflicting moral issue is whether ornot there is freedom involved in the decision making process. Act utilitarianism givesunlimited freedom, while rule utilitarianism gives virtually no freedom, but ruleutilitarianism gives structure and stability to the

Watchmen Essay

1369 words - 6 pages external source. Two types of philosophical ethnics are deontology and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism focuses on maximizing happiness while deontology focuses on duty and rationality. If one was given the option to save the life of one person or save the life of five, how would one respond? Those who believe in utilitarianism have a different mindset as to how to solve this crisis. However, like any theory that exists, there are always strength and


1465 words - 6 pages This essay will present the key features of Utilitarianism and identify the problems of Utilitarianism to the extent to which they make Utilitarianism unacceptable. Jeremy Bentham founded Utilitarianism. He lived at a time of great change. With revolutions in France and America, demands were being made for human rights and greater democracy. Bentham worked on legal reform. Utilitarianism is associated with the principle of

Can Utilitarianism meet the objections of its critics?

1848 words - 7 pages of "Jim and the Indians"(13) is a good example of such a dilemma. From the act-utilitarian point of view Jim has to kill the one Indian to save the others.A special kind of utilitarianism, rule-utilitarianism, tries to reply to this objection to endorse horrific acts by setting up rules which maximise happiness when being generally obeyed. Iff an action conforms to these rules it is right. In the "Jim and the Indians" - case, however, it fails

The Conflict between Common Sense Morality and Utilitarianism

887 words - 4 pages encourage actions that contradict common sense morality, the body of moral rules accepted by society. This impression raises an objection to Utilitarianism saying it promotes unjust, evil actions. For example, imagine a case of a surgeon who has five patients who can only be saved by transplantations of certain organs, and another patient with healthy organs. According to Utilitarianism, sacrificing the healthy patient in order to save five others

Similar Essays

Act Versus Rule Utilitarianism Essay

1242 words - 5 pages bring about the greatest happiness to the most people, whereas act-utilitarianism seeks to find which action should be applied to bring about the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people. In this paper I will argue that rule-utilitarianism is the more plausible of the two positions because society cannot function without set rules of conduct. In his article, Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism, J.J.C. Smart renames act-utilitarianism as

Society Must Be Governed By Rules

1719 words - 7 pages Society Must be Governed by Rules According to Sober, "Utilitarianism is an ethical theory whose central idea is 'the greatest good for the greatest number'" (Sober 430). Utilitarianism rose in opposition to the idea that the upper crust of society had the right to arrange the rules of society as they saw fit. The concern of Utilitarianism is the most good for the most people, not the most good for the people that "matter." From this

A Philosphical Essay On Utilitarianism

660 words - 3 pages problems if you use this rule in a place where it is not generally followed as problems will be caused if you differ from the general population. Another difficulty is that all the best rules would be very complicated and this would make them hard to follow and many people would not bother to follow them at all.Examples of rule utilitarianism: A man needs a lot of money to get a lifesaving operation on his heart, he doesn't have the money and

Utilitarianism: Founding Fathers, Strengths And Weaknesses Of Act Utilitarianism And Rule Utilitarianism, Other Forms Of Utilitarianism, And Recent Philosophers

1528 words - 6 pages for the greatest number. In order for this method to be effective decision makers must first establish a set of rules that benefit the greater number, before they are put into a personal situation.One pro of rule-utilitarianism is that decision making becomes less personal, which means the greater good will most likely be brought about for the greater number. Another pro is that the decision maker does not have to weigh the pro's and con's of