This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Samuel Huntingtons' The "Clash Of Civilizations"

1270 words - 6 pages

People identify themselves as members of many different groups but there are certain identifications that cannot be made by choice. The most basic identifications one makes are based on indisputable fact. One's cultural identity the answer to "What civilization are you from?" "Who are you?", is the broadest and most indisputable way one can identify themselves. Civilizations and membership in one is a matter of history (did your ancestors experience the Renaissance? On which side of the great schism would you have fallen?) and religion (including religious history, i.e. Jewish history). Huntington claims that "after the iron curtain (that divides nations) falls, the velvet curtain will ...view middle of the document...

As I previously mentioned, Samuel Huntington, has taken it upon himself to define for his readers which are the modern day civilizations he lists them as: Western, Confucian, Japanese, Islamic, Hindu, Slavic-Orthodox, Latin American and possibly African civilization (although I do not doubt an African or conglomeration of African civilizations). He claims that because people within the same civilization have grown so dependant upon one and other (Inter-state/international trade) that inter-cultural war will become obsolete and the larger divisions will become more prominent because they are more important in an ever shrinking world. His theory that violent conflict will take place at the physical boundaries between civilizations (fault lines as he calls them) is supported by post-publication wars in the former Yugoslavia where 3 fault lines meet and in Chechnya (meeting of Slavic Orthodox, Islam, and Confucian or central-Asian). These were wars that did not involve politics or economics (as Huntington predicted) but rather the dislike of who or what another person or group of people is. Although Huntington's claim is validated by those occurrences can he explain the war in the Congo or the current conflict in Iraq? He would be unable to explain them.Edward Said, however, can explain those situations. He understands that the war in the Congo is a civil war and that until people can clearly define themselves they will battle others in search of themselves. For if a man does not know who he is he must ask another and if he does not understand the other, then he must be shown who he is. He explains that the reason that Huntington's argument is infrequently legitimate is because he ignored history completely (things like colonialism are a great cause for intercultural conflict). It is understandable that conflicts will occur at fault-lines but there will also be divisions within civilizations that will cause physical conflict. For Said the conflict will be within civilizations and it will be about power, and identity not colonization and world domination.Although I agree more with the writings of Said, I cannot ignore the relevance of Huntington's argument. Said himself agrees with part of what Huntington says and in a supplementary sense its necessary. In regards to the war on terror, Said's article is more relevant. Although it can be interpreted that the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center was a culture clash; radical Islam vs. Western Superpower the United States; Those attacks, were...

Find Another Essay On Samuel Huntingtons' The "Clash Of Civilizations"

Comments of Huntington's "The Clash of Civilizations

1171 words - 5 pages /economics/misc/clash.html)Heilbrunn, Jacob. "The Clash of the Samuel Huntingtons." Abstract. August 1, 1998. (http://www.prospect.org/print/V9/39/heilbrunn-j.html)Kung, Hans. "No Peace among Civilizations without Peace among Religions." Abstract. November 22, 2000. (http://www.dialoguecentre.org/PDF/Kung.pdf)"Religion, Culture, and International Conflict After September 11." A Conversation with Samuel P. Huntington. June 17, 2002. (http://www.eppc.org/printVersion/print_pub.asp?pubID=1537)

Comments Of Huntington's "The Clash Of Civilizations"

1183 words - 5 pages Samuel P. Huntington's paper "The Clash of Civilizations" defines the shifting of causes for friction between nations. He describes the changing of the guard, between secular ideological friction, such as democracy versus communism, to cultural and religious reasoning. Huntington's hypothesis is based heavily on examples of recent struggles between civilizations all over the world. I agree with Huntington's hypothesis because it is evident that

September 11: The Clash of Civilizations

1216 words - 5 pages with the freedom of speech, religion, and in most cases, the ability to have a second chance, while people living in other countries don’t have these luxuries. Works Cited Bush, George. Text of Bush's address. 16 February 2003. CUSA. Amendments to the Constitution. 10 March 2003. Huntington, Samuel P. “The Clash of Civilizations?”. The Aims of Argument. Fourth Edition. Ed. Timothy W. Crusius and Carolyn E. Channell. New York

The Clash of Civilizations: Culture & Conflict

1390 words - 6 pages KAWING LAMThe Clash of Civilizations: Culture & ConflictIn the modern world, the West is the most modernalized and powerful society. The main reason is because the West not only knows how to invent but also learn from other civilizations and make changes to become better. However, the non - Western countries, especially the Islamic and Chinese societies are catching up. As they are growing in a fast pace and have more control to the world

“Clash of Civilizations”

866 words - 3 pages Realism is the contrast of the Idealist conception that society can change on the foundation of an idea. The “Clash of Civilizations” by Samuel Huntington is a brilliant illustration that exhibits the power of ideas that has vastly influenced both foreign policies of countries, but also the discipline of International Relations. Samuel Huntington's “the clash of civilizations,” is based on the hypothesis: “In the post-Cold War world the most

Clash of civilizations

1411 words - 6 pages believe the conflict of the future will occur along the cultural fault lines separating civilizations [1]. So what exactly is the clash of civilizations? This was briefly addressed in Samuel Huntington’s paper “The clash of civilizations?”. In order to explain the term, let’s first look into what civilization is. Person does not simply get to choose the civilization he/she simply belongs to. Communists can become democrats and vice versa, but

Clash of civilizations

1000 words - 4 pages FTA partners comprising of 31 economies, among which 8 Agreements have been signed already9. How long can China continue to be an economic superpower if they keep in sourcing vs. making social investments with long term returns? Works Cited 1. Huntington, Samuel P, “The clash of civilizations?” Foreign Affairs; summer 1993; 72, 3; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 22 2. Kirk Spitzer, “U.S. sends B-52s over China-claimed waters”, USA

A Personal Perspective of the Clash of Civilizations

3136 words - 13 pages Even though Samuel Huntington believes that world conflicts are brought about from a clash of culture, global conflict portray the source as being more religious as religious influence has promoted global conflicts aiming toward a New World Order where everyone sees the same views and aiming towards the same objective. James Gelvin stated in his book that scholars, journalist, and policy makers adopted and popularized the ideas of Samuel P

Analysis Of Huntington's "Clash Of Civilizations"

1585 words - 7 pages is correct in saying that civilizations differ greatly, and differences in such issues as cultural values, including gender equality and tolerance for homosexuals, show how the civilizations could clash in some way.Works CitedDalton, Russell. Citizen Politics. 3. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 1988.Huntington, Samuel. "The Clash of Civilizations." Foreign Affairs 72(1993): n3Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Criticism of Huntington's Clash of Civilizations Theory

838 words - 4 pages INTRODUCTION In 1992 within a lecture Samuel P. Huntington proposed a theory that suggests that people's cultural and religious identities will undoubtedly be the primary source of conflict in the post-Cold War world, this theory is known as the Clash of Civilizations. Therefore this essay provides a criticism of this theory, whether I agree or disagree with it and also the aspects I like or dislike about the theory as a whole. Generally

The Clash of Generations

2090 words - 9 pages THE CLASH OF GENERATIONS BALANCING GENERATIONAL CLAIMS The clash between generations is inherent in character of mankind as seen from the famous saying of George Orwell “Each generation imagines itself to be more intelligent than the one that went before it, and wiser than the one that comes after it.” The differences arise due to difference in age, experience, and priorities leading to tension. Every generation has a role to play in deciding

Similar Essays

Samuel Huntington's "Clash Of Civilizations" Essay

1178 words - 5 pages Samuel P. Huntington's paper "The clash of civilizations" defines the shifting of causes for friction between nations. He describes the changing of the guard, between secular ideological friction, such as democracy versus communism, to cultural and religious reasoning. Huntington's hypothesis is based heavily on examples of recent struggles between civilizations all over the world. I agree with Huntington's hypothesis because it is evident that

The Validity Of Samuel P. Huntington’s Thesis In “The Clash Of Civilizations”

1344 words - 5 pages The aim of Samuel P. Huntington’s “The Clash of Civilizations” was to provide an academic framework to understand almost all of the conflicts that had broken out since the end of the twentieth century, to include predicting the appearance of future conflicts. According to Huntington, there will be a clash of civilizations since the world has been in an unreasonable era since the end of the Cold War and the position of the nation-state has not

Samuel Huntington's The Clash Of Civilizations And The Remaking Of World Order

2665 words - 11 pages Abstract Samuel Huntington's The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order defines eight major civilizations on the basis of religion. This division of global powers can be used to prove that the Western civilization will never completely dominate the global media. While Western thought tends to lead to a more representative form of government, and consequently a more libertarian or social responsibility-based media, the other

The Clash Of Civilizations Essay

2194 words - 9 pages believe that a conflict may occur when one puts pressure on the other; but the reason why this pressure takes place, varies among the two theories. In his article, “The Clash of Civilizations”, Huntington points out that in the 21st century, conflicts will not occur based on ideology of a state or civilization, neither on economic power; but they will take place because the differences in cultural and religious identity between civilizations. As