Are businesses in corporate America making it harder for the American public to trust them with all the recent scandals going on? Corruptions are everywhere and especially in businesses, but are these legal or are they ethical problems corporate America has? Bruce Frohnen, Leo Clarke, and Jeffrey L. Seglin believe it may just be a little bit of both. Frohnen and Clarke represent their belief that the scandals in corporate America are ethical problems. On the other hand, Jeffrey L. Seglin argues that the problems in American businesses are a combination of ethical and legal problems. The ideas of ethical problems in corporate America are illustrated differently in both Frohnen and Clarke’s essay and Seglin’s essay.
In Bruce Frohnen and Leo Clarke’s essay, "Scandal in Corporate America: An Ethical, Not a Legal, Problem" they discuss their views of American businesses and the little honesty that these businesses have. They claim how important honesty is within businesses and how it will help our public’s well-being and corporate America. They view American business officials to be greedy and many of their jobs just consist of helping businesses find their way around the laws. Frohnen and Clarke then conclude their essay with suggestions on how to change business ethics with education and simply being honest (113-119).
Then, in Jeffrey L. Seglin’s essay, “Just Because It’s Legal, Is It Right?” he reveals his perspective on corporate America. Seglin argues that different sides give way to different views of the law. Then, he goes on to emphasize that laws are just pardon from having to think and do your job right. Seglin then brings up the idea of situational ethics and how it is just used to cover up for people and blame everyone but their selves. Seglin believes corruption in American businesses to be both an ethical and a legal problem (120-128).
First, Frohnen and Clarke consider the problems of lying and cheating to be wrong and not ethical whatsoever. Frohnen and Clarke discuss how accountants and lawyers do not do their job correct because they are just trying to get around the laws and trying not to get caught which is morally wrong. Frohnen and Clarke emphasize that we are losing the understanding of what it means to act honestly. The authors point out that we have completely lost our ability to impose rational honesty, which is important to our public well-being.
Agreeing with Frohnen and Clarke, Seglin stresses how honesty and ethical behavior is crucial to our public as a whole. Seglin discusses situational ethics by stating that it “misses the inconsistency between the way you behave and the ways others are when they behave exactly the same way and you hold them to be unethical” (126). Frohnen and...